Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Green v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Revision
38 Ohio St. 3d 701 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1988
Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 84-A-874, 85-F-611, 84-A-875 and 85-B-612. On joint motion for remand. Motion granted. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedElectronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. State Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)
166 Ohio St. 3d 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2021
Shumway v. … Professionals Guild of Ohio, 46 Ohio St.3d 147, 152-153, 545 N.E.2d 1260 (1989) (lead opinion); id. at 155 (Brown, J., concurring). {¶ 35} R.C. 3301.13 provides that the department, which includes the state board,
Cited 4 timesPublishedCincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Kosydar
38 Ohio St. 2d 71 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1974
Co. v. Peck (1953), 160 Ohio St. 322 , 116 N. E. 2d 304 ; and Warren Telephone Co. v. Bowers (1962), 173 Ohio St. 164 , 180 N. E. 2d 595 . … In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, 0. J., Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. BrowN and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Wichman v. Board of Trustees of Police Relief Fund
150 Ohio St. 280 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1948
It was compelled to enact rules governing the disbursement of its funds, and without rules such board could not create a pension roll. In the case of State, ex rel. Dieckroegger, v. Conners, 122 Ohio St., 359 , 171 N. … Little, v. Carter, 111 Ohio St., 526 , 146 N. E., 56, 57 ; Holmes et al., Board of Trustees, v. State, ex rel. Delaney, 93 Ohio St., 480 , 113 N. E., 1070 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Welsh v. Ohio State Medical Board
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1964
In response to a question from the bench, relator’s attorney conceded that the opinion in Welsh v. Ohio State Medical Board, 111 Ohio App., 79 , was an accurate portrayal of the proceedings and facts set forth therein. … It would serve no useful purpose at this time to discuss *138 the various issues raised by relator in this case; such issues were raised and thoroughly considered in the exhaustive opinion of the court in Welsh v.
Cited 0 timesPublished48 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1990
We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mallory
65 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1992
We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Ohio St. 2d 92 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1967
Smith, v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur. Wasserman, J., of the Eighth Appellate District sitting for Schneider, J.
Cited 15 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox
17 Ohio St. 3d 68 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 1985
This court has carefully reviewed the record in this case and concurs in the findings and recommendation of the board. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1975
Sherrick, v. Peck (1952), 158 Ohio St. 122 , 107 N. E. 2d 145 , is disapproved, and the first paragraph of the syllabus of that case is overruled. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., dissent. R.
Cited 55 timesPublishedState ex rel. Colgrove v. Supanick
41 Ohio St. 2d 141 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1975
Giuliani, v. Perk (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 235, 236 , in a per curiam opinion, this court said: “We trust that this decision, when read in conjunction with State, ex rel. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the judgment only. CorrigaN and Celebrezze, JJ., dissent. The auditor is free to act on his own initiative in paying the fees in this case. R.
Cited 1 timesPublished42 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1989
This court has reviewed the record and concurs in the report of the board. The applicant’s applications for registration and examination are disapproved. He may reapply after one year from the date of this order. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Cleveland City School District v. City of Shaker Heights
137 Ohio St. 597 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1941
City of Cleveland Heights, v. Davis, 131 Ohio St., 380 , 3 N. E. (2d), 49, and Board of Edn. of Cleveland Heights City School Dist. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 136 Ohio St., 283 , 25 N. E. (2d), 453. … Rice, Treas., v. Lutz, County Aud., 129 Ohio St., 201 , 194 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. Hurley
2018 Ohio 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2018
Applicable precedent {¶ 23} To support its recommended sanction, the board cited *265 Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Brown , 143 Ohio St.3d 333 , 2015-Ohio-2344 , 37 N.E.3d 1199 , ¶ 15.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFurbay v. Tuscarawas County Bd. of Revision
61 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1991
The board does not have a duty to investigate a property owner’s complaint and “[a] taxpayer, moreover, has the duty to prove his right to a reduction in value. RRZ Associates v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Boano
46 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1989
We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and also adopt the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished60 Ohio St. 3d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991
We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished60 Ohio St. 3d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991
We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCleveland Bar Ass'n v. Brenner
40 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1988
This court agrees with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months. Costs taxed to respondent. … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kolmacic
44 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1989
We concur with the board’s findings that the respondent violated Judicial Canon 3C(l)(d)(ii). Respondent, Joseph Michael Kolmacic, is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna