Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Green v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Revision

    38 Ohio St. 3d 701 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1988

    Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 84-A-874, 85-F-611, 84-A-875 and 85-B-612. On joint motion for remand. Motion granted. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. State Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)

    166 Ohio St. 3d 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2021

    Shumway v. … Professionals Guild of Ohio, 46 Ohio St.3d 147, 152-153, 545 N.E.2d 1260 (1989) (lead opinion); id. at 155 (Brown, J., concurring). {¶ 35} R.C. 3301.13 provides that the department, which includes the state board,

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Kosydar

    38 Ohio St. 2d 71 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1974

    Co. v. Peck (1953), 160 Ohio St. 322 , 116 N. E. 2d 304 ; and Warren Telephone Co. v. Bowers (1962), 173 Ohio St. 164 , 180 N. E. 2d 595 . … In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, 0. J., Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. BrowN and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wichman v. Board of Trustees of Police Relief Fund

    150 Ohio St. 280 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1948

    It was compelled to enact rules governing the disbursement of its funds, and without rules such board could not create a pension roll. In the case of State, ex rel. Dieckroegger, v. Conners, 122 Ohio St., 359 , 171 N. … Little, v. Carter, 111 Ohio St., 526 , 146 N. E., 56, 57 ; Holmes et al., Board of Trustees, v. State, ex rel. Delaney, 93 Ohio St., 480 , 113 N. E., 1070 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Welsh v. Ohio State Medical Board

    176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1964

    In response to a question from the bench, relator’s attorney conceded that the opinion in Welsh v. Ohio State Medical Board, 111 Ohio App., 79 , was an accurate portrayal of the proceedings and facts set forth therein. … It would serve no useful purpose at this time to discuss *138 the various issues raised by relator in this case; such issues were raised and thoroughly considered in the exhaustive opinion of the court in Welsh v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Louden

    48 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1990

    We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mallory

    65 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1992

    We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McKelvey

    12 Ohio St. 2d 92 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1967

    Smith, v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur. Wasserman, J., of the Eighth Appellate District sitting for Schneider, J.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox

    17 Ohio St. 3d 68 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 1985

    This court has carefully reviewed the record in this case and concurs in the findings and recommendation of the board. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Castellano v. Kosydar

    42 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1975

    Sherrick, v. Peck (1952), 158 Ohio St. 122 , 107 N. E. 2d 145 , is disapproved, and the first paragraph of the syllabus of that case is overruled. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., dissent. R.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Colgrove v. Supanick

    41 Ohio St. 2d 141 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1975

    Giuliani, v. Perk (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 235, 236 , in a per curiam opinion, this court said: “We trust that this decision, when read in conjunction with State, ex rel. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the judgment only. CorrigaN and Celebrezze, JJ., dissent. The auditor is free to act on his own initiative in paying the fees in this case. R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re McGraw

    42 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1989

    This court has reviewed the record and concurs in the report of the board. The applicant’s applications for registration and examination are disapproved. He may reapply after one year from the date of this order. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Cleveland City School District v. City of Shaker Heights

    137 Ohio St. 597 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1941

    City of Cleveland Heights, v. Davis, 131 Ohio St., 380 , 3 N. E. (2d), 49, and Board of Edn. of Cleveland Heights City School Dist. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 136 Ohio St., 283 , 25 N. E. (2d), 453. … Rice, Treas., v. Lutz, County Aud., 129 Ohio St., 201 , 194 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. Hurley

    2018 Ohio 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2018

    Applicable precedent {¶ 23} To support its recommended sanction, the board cited *265 Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Brown , 143 Ohio St.3d 333 , 2015-Ohio-2344 , 37 N.E.3d 1199 , ¶ 15.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Furbay v. Tuscarawas County Bd. of Revision

    61 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1991

    The board does not have a duty to investigate a property owner’s complaint and “[a] taxpayer, moreover, has the duty to prove his right to a reduction in value. RRZ Associates v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Boano

    46 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1989

    We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and also adopt the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rost

    60 Ohio St. 3d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991

    We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Doyle

    60 Ohio St. 3d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991

    We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Brenner

    40 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1988

    This court agrees with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months. Costs taxed to respondent. … Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kolmacic

    44 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1989

    We concur with the board’s findings that the respondent violated Judicial Canon 3C(l)(d)(ii). Respondent, Joseph Michael Kolmacic, is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.