Case law

Cincinnati City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)

142 Ohio St. 3d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 23, 2014

From a statutory-construction or an equity perspective, it is wholly irrelevant that the board, or anyone affected, did not challenge the tax status in 2006. … Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C., David C. Olson, and Matthew C. Blickensderfer; and Daniel J. Hoying, Cincinnati School District Assistant General Counsel, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Daniel W.

Hancock County Children Services v. Moloney

24 Ohio St. 3d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1986

, * * * the * * * board * * * shall submit an initial plan to the court * * *.” … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. City of Brecksville v. Husted

133 Ohio St. 3d 301 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2012

Donnelly v. … Coalition v. Webb, 106 Ohio St.3d 437 , 2005-Ohio-5009 , 835 N.E.2d 1222 , ¶ 47. Judgment accordingly. *306 O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Cohn v. Shaker Hts. City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

78 Ohio St. 3d 516 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1997

COHN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. SHAKER HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Cohn v. Shaker Hts. City School Dist. … Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 26, 641 N.E.2d 188; State ex rel. Brown v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

1994 Ohio 198 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … Crabbe, Brown, Jones, Potts & Schmidt and Larry H. James, for respondent. Per Curiam. We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board.

Midwest Transfer Co. v. Porterfield

13 Ohio St. 2d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1968

Truck Lines v. … The Oregon case was cited and quoted from in Russo v. Donahue, 10 Ohio St. 2d 201, 212 , 226 N. E. 2d 747, 754 .

Heckert v. Patrick

15 Ohio St. 3d 402 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Hensley v. Montgomery Cty. (1975), 25 Md. App. 361 , 334 A. 2d 542 ; Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Assn. (1969), 104 Ariz. 513 , 456 P. 2d 371 ; Albin v. Natl. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent. See Annotation (1979), 94 A.L.R. 3d 1160 .

OAMCO v. Lindley

29 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1987

Accordingly, the validity of other decisions by the Board of Tax Appeals, rendered prior to the date of this decision, shall not be affected. Accord Schucker v. Metcalf (1986), 22 Ohio St. 3d 33, 39 ; Hoover v. … Brown, J., not participating.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexicole, Inc.

105 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2004

VII(2)(A) and see, e.g., Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Kolodner, 103 Ohio St.3d 504 , 2004-Ohio-5581 , 817 N.E.2d 25 (negotiating to settle another’s debt-collection case is the practice of law), and Disciplinary Counsel v. … Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 114 , 2003-Ohio-2568 , 789 N.E.2d 210 (participating in pretrial conferences and depositions on another’s behalf is the practice of law).

State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Bd.

82 Ohio St. 3d 273 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1998

KERNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Bd., 1998-Ohio-242.] … _________________ Martin, Pergram & Browning Co., L.P.A., and James M.

State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

72 Ohio St. 3d 205 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1995

Seikbert v. … Schneider v. N. Olmsted City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 348, 350 , 603 N.E.2d 1024 , 1025, and State ex rel. Rose v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marble

21 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1986

Upon review of the record, this court concurs with the board’s findings and conclusions. In view of Marble’s prior sanction, Gov. Bar. R. V(7) necessitates at least an indefinite suspension. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Kroger Co. v. Limbach

53 Ohio St. 3d 245 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1990

The syllabus in Hawthorn Mellody reads as follows: *247 “The Supreme Court will not overrule findings of fact of the Board of Tax Appeals that are based upon sufficient probative evidence. (Citizens Financial Corp. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent. R.C. 5741.02(C)(2) provides a concomitant exception for use tax.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo

21 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1986

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and ( … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

South-Western City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

152 Ohio St. 3d 122 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2017

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-8384 SOUTH-WESTERN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … Bd. of Edn. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Markijohn

99 Ohio St. 3d 489 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2003

The panel thus found respondent’s misconduct more comparable to that committed in Dayton Bar Assn. v. … Dayton Bar Assn. v.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Watson

132 Ohio St. 3d 496 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2012

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Watson, 132 Ohio St.3d 496, 2012-Ohio-3830.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATSON. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Watson, 132 Ohio St.3d 496, 2012-Ohio-3830.] … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v.

Master Consolidated Corp. v. BancOhio National Bank

61 Ohio St. 3d 570 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1991

Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co. (1986), 26 Ohio St.3d 15 , 26 OBR 12, 496 N.E.2d 959 . … This court, in Miller v. Wick Big.

Corporate Exchange Buildings IV & V, Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of Revision

82 Ohio St. 3d 297 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1998

Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 325 , 677 N.E.2d 1197 . … The BTA affirmed the board of revision’s valuation of $184,500 for the purchased warehouse, stating that the sale occurred “under peculiar circumstances.”

State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'n

44 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1989

Furthermore, references to its activities in the board of trustees’ minutes are also subject to disclosure. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., concur separately. Holmes, J., dissents in part and concurs in part. Wright, J., not participating.