Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.94s

  • State ex rel. Pincombe v. Board of State Teachers Retirement System

    172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1961

    In construing the above-quoted provisions, this court, in State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Mansfield Board of Education v. Common Pleas Court

    172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 259 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1961

    , that, on appeal to this court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals was reversed and the cause remanded to that court for issuance of the injunction (Sterkel v. … Mansfield Board of Education, 172 Ohio St., 231 ), and that the questions presentéd by this mandamus action have thus become moot, the cause is dismissed. Cause dismissed. Weygandt, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Stuard

    121 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2009

    State v. Roberts, 110 Ohio St.3d 71 , 2006-Ohio-3665 , 850 N.E.2d 1168, ¶ 164 . … Id. {¶ 15} Judge Stuard has complied with our mandate in State v. Roberts, 110 Ohio St.3d 71 , 2006-Ohio-3665 , 850 N.E.2d 1168 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. King v. Rhodes

    11 Ohio St. 2d 95 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1967

    Genl., v. … Evans, v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ohioans for Secure & Fair Elections v. LaRose (Slip Opinion)

    2020 Ohio 1459 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2020

    Burton v. … Roahrig v. Brown, 30 Ohio St.2d 82, 84, 282 N.E.2d 584 (1972).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision

    96 Ohio St. 3d 165 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 2002

    CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. SOUTH BROAD COMPANY, LTD., APPELLANT, v. … OAMCO v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall

    43 Ohio St. 3d 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1989

    We concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Zaccagnini

    130 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2011

    V(6)(F). … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Flak v. Betras (Slip Opinion)

    152 Ohio St. 3d 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 6, 2017

    Jacquemin v. Union Cty. … Brown , 7 Ohio St.3d 5 , 6, 454 N.E.2d 1321 (1983). {¶ 13} Just last year, however, this court held that a county board of elections may properly refuse to certify a proposed municipal ordinance to the ballot when the ordinance

    Abrogated by State ex rel. Maxcy v. Saferin (Slip Opinion), 155 Ohio St. 3d 496 (2018)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Webber

    15 Ohio St. 2d 177 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1968

    Board of Zoning Appeals (1962), 173 Ohio St. 168 , 180 N. E. 2d 591 ; Bailes v. Martin (1963), 2 Ohio App. 2d 197 , 207 N. E. 2d 385 . … Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • O'Farrell v. Landis

    135 Ohio St. 3d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2013

    [Cite as O’Farrell v. Landis, 135 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-93.] O’FARRELL v. LANDIS ET AL. [Cite as O’Farrell v. Landis, 135 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-93.] … For example, in Squire v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Marchbank

    61 Ohio St. 3d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1991

    We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also agree that suspension with a conditioned probation is the appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Retirement Board of State Teachers' Retirement System v. Kurtz

    110 Ohio St. 332 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1924

    The local expense of maintaining the normal school in each county shall be paid by the county board of education from its contingent fund.” (108 pt. 1, v. 233; 104 v. 155.) … All expense in excess thereof shall be paid by the county board of education from its contingent fund.” (108 pt. 1, v. 234; 104 v. 156.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Talbott

    59 Ohio St. 2d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1979

    The board of commissioners recommends that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ohio Congress of Parents & Teachers v. State Board of Education

    111 Ohio St. 3d 568 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2006

    State v. … changes in the school board.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

    160 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 14, 2020

    Finkbeiner v. Lucas Cty. … Georgetown v. Brown Cty. Bd. of Elections, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-3915, ___ N.E.3d ___, ¶ 23-25, citing State ex rel. Crowl v. Delaware Cty.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Zapor

    127 Ohio St. 3d 372 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 2010

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Zapor, 127 Ohio St.3d 372, 2010-Ohio-5769.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ZAPOR. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Zapor, 127 Ohio St.3d 372, 2010-Ohio-5769.] … Dayton Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Montgomery County Park District v. Kinney

    61 Ohio St. 2d 88 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980

    We note the similarity between the relevant facts herein and those addressed by this court in Atwell v. Board of Park Commrs. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 257 . … C. 5709.10, regardless of its use. 5 The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wingate

    60 Ohio St. 3d 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991

    We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years. … V(23).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire

    63 Ohio St. 3d 391 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1992

    After a thorough review of the record, we agree with the board as to its findings of fact and conclusions of law, but disagree as to the sanction. Accordingly, we hereby suspend Charles A. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.