Case law

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Thompson

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1957

Speeth et al., Board of County Commrs., v. Carney, Aud., 163 Ohio St., 159 , 126 N. … Nixon, v. Merrell, Dir., 127 Ohio St., 72 , 186 N. E., 806 . The questions raised by defenses one and three have been eliminated by the amendment to the petition.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

51 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1990

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Flynn v. Board of Elections

164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 193 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1955

Lippincott, v. Metzger et al., Board of Elections, 137 Ohio St., 307 , 29 N. … Anderson, v. Hyde et al., Board of Elections, 140 Ohio St., 339 , 44 N.

State ex rel. Wilson v. Gulvas

63 Ohio St. 3d 600 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 1992

Hover, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. .

State ex rel. Haines v. Board of Education

131 Ohio St. (N.S.) 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1936

A court in exercising the extraordinary power of mandamus takes into consideration the facts and conditions existing at the time it determines whether to issue a peremptory writ (Trumbull County Board of Education v. … McKey, Trustee, v. Cooper, Aud., 99 Ohio St., 258 .)

State ex rel. Carson v. Board of Education

115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1926

In Heine v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 86 U. S., (19 Wall.), 655, 22 L. … Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 193 Ill., 577 , 62 N. E., 196 ; Woods v. Hyde, City Treasurer, 64 Cal. App., 433 , 222 P., 168 ; Mansfield v. Langtry, 228 Mass., 262 , 117 N. E., 311 .

City of Cleveland v. Public Library Board of the City School District

94 Ohio St. 311 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1916

Wasson et al. v. Commissioners, 49 Ohio St., 622 , and Hubbard, Treas., v. Fitzsimmons, 57 Ohio St., 436. … Commissioners and Hubbard, Treas., v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bowman

15 Ohio St. 2d 220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1968

There will be cases, like Toledo Bar Association v. Lichota, 15 Ohio St. 2d 217 , where the conviction was only part of the misconduct. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Carmean v. Board of Education

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1960

Hanna et al., Lake County Board of Elections, v. Milburn, 170 Ohio St., 9 , 161 N. E. (2d), 891, had a similar question for determination. … Appellant bases its argument primarily on the case of Trumbull County Board of Education v. State, ex rel. Van Wye, 122 Ohio St., 247 , 171 N. E., 241 .

State ex rel. Farley v. Board of Education

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 388 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1959

teacher employed by the board who holds a provisional or temporary certificate. “4. … Rutherford, v. Barberton Board of Education, 148 Ohio St., 242 , 74 N. E. (2d), 246.

State ex rel. Bailey v. Board of Trustees

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1959

In the case of Batchelor et al., Bd. of Trustees of Police Relief Fund of Cleveland Heights, v. Newness, 145 Ohio St., 115 , 60 N. … Simmons, v. Wieber et al., Bd. of Trustees of Police Relief Fund of Cleveland, 145 Ohio St., 121 , 60 N.

Walton v. Montgomery County Welfare Department

69 Ohio St. 2d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1982

Brown, J. … Hill v.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Crandall

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1958

The state Department of Education shall determine that the proceeds of such bonds are needed for the purpose of acquiring sites and equipment or constructing any permanent improvement which a board of education is authorized … City of Cincinnati, v. Flick, And., 153 Ohio St., 294 , 91 N. E. (2d), 673. Our conclusion as to the first issue makes it unnecessary to consider the second.

Cassell v. Lexington Township Board of Zoning Appeals

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 340 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1955

Farming, residential, commercial, recreational. ’ ’ The zoning regulation then sets forth four resolutions apparently adopted by the board of trustees. … City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co., 112 Ohio St., *346 654 , 148 N. E., 842 , 43 A. L. R., 662, and State, ex rel. Synod of Ohio, v. Joseph et al., Village Comm., 139 Ohio St., 229 , 39 N.

State ex rel. Milhoof v. Board of Education

76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 297 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1907

Justice Brown, in delivering the opinion of the court in Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S., 133, 136 , as a proper exercise of the police power. … . ■ In Bissel v.

State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Board of Hancock County Commissioners

82 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1998

Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426-427 , 639 N.E.2d 83, 89 . As The Blade concedes, its mandamus claim is moot because the board has now given it a copy of the settlement agreement. State ex rel. … Network v.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Griffith

74 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1906

We refer this case to the third class and cite as illustrations the following cases: State v. Medary, 17 Ohio, 554; Wilson v. State, 67 Kan., 44; People v. Pennock, 60 N. Y., 421 ; State v. … Bonner, 72 Mo., 387 ; Orton v. City of Lincoln, 156 Ill., 499 ; State v. Moores, 56 Neb., 82 ; County of San Luis Obispo v. Farnum, 108 Cal., 562 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McGinley

55 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1990

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board's findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to the respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Thurston v. Board of Education

140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1942

Bishop v. Board of Education of Mt. Orab Village School Dist., 139 Ohio St., 427 , 40 N. … with each teacher holding a professional, permanent, or life certificate who, at the time of the passage of this act, is completing five or more consecutive years of employment by said board.”

State ex rel. Robertson v. Board of Education

27 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Co. v. Comm’rs Clinton. County, supra; State v. Van Horne, 7 Ohio St. 327 ; State v. … The limited power of theseboards is considered in Board Education Brown Tp. v. Cheney, 5 Ohio St. 67 . Peremptory writ awarded. Whitman and Johnson, JJ., concurred.