Case law

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Miller

132 Ohio St. 3d 63 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 2012

[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Miller, 132 Ohio St.3d 63, 2012-Ohio-1880.] TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. MILLER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Miller, 132 Ohio St.3d 63, 2012-Ohio-1880.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical Board

107 Ohio St. (N.S.) 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1923

This case finds a parallel in the case of Duncan, Judge, v. State, ex rel. Brown, 82 Ohio St., 351 . … Chute, v.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Rosett.

154 Ohio St. 3d 117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2018

Columbus Bar Assn. v. … In support of this sanction, the board cites three cases in which we have imposed one-year suspensions stayed on similar conditions for comparable misconduct. See Toledo Bar Assn. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

37 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1988

Therefore, we concur in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). However, we believe respondent’s conduct requires a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. … Brown, J., dissents with opinion. Judith A. Christley, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Moyer, C.J.

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

50 Ohio St. 2d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1977

Republic Steel Corp., v. … In Board of Edn. v.

State ex rel. Myers v. Board of Education

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1917

Concerning the meaning to be given to the words “may” and “shall” this court in The State of Ohio v. … Justice Swayne, in Supervisors v. United States, ex relatione, 71 U.

Hubbell v. City of Xenia

115 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2007

The court of appeals determined that the Ninth District had a better approach, citing Brown v. … . {¶ 16} In Brown, the court failed to completely analyze the statute when it stated: “The issue this court must determine is whether the trial court’s order denying the board’s motion for summary judgment was an order denying

Continental Can Co. v. Donahue

5 Ohio St. 2d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1966

In State Board of Tax Commrs. of Indiana v. Jackson, 283 U. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Herbert, Brenneman and Brown, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. King

132 Ohio St. 3d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2012

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King, 132 Ohio St.3d 501, 2012-Ohio-873.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King, 132 Ohio St.3d 501, 2012-Ohio-873.] … Bar Assn. v. Troy, 121 Ohio St.3d 51, 2009-Ohio-502, 901 N.E.2d 809, ¶ 11. {¶ 13} In this case, the board found four aggravating factors.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

51 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1990

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Josselson

43 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1989

We concur in the board’s findings. We also impose a six-month suspension. … Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Ohio ex rel. Laskey v. Board of Education

35 Ohio St. (N.S.) 519 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

They are illegal, if at all, because unauthorized by statute, i. e., because the board had no power to make such a contract. As was said in Bank of Chillicothe v. … Claypool v. Sturges, 10 Ohio St. 440 ; Bunn v. Kinney, Samyn v. Phillips, 15 Ohio St. 40 , 218; West v. Meddock, 16 Ohio St. 817 .

Cobblestone Square Co. v. Lorain County Board of Revision

106 Ohio St. 3d 305 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2005

Elyria filed a notice of appeal with the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). However, as a result of this court’s decision in Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. … In the *307 syllabus of Walters v. Knox Cty.

State ex rel. Wilen v. Kent (Slip Opinion)

144 Ohio St. 3d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2015

Cramer v. Brown, 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6, 454 N.E.2d 1321 (1983). Applying Cramer, we decline to consider the city’s constitutional challenge at this time. … Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C., Philip K. Hartmann, Eugene L. Hollins, and Yazan S.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baker

65 Ohio St. 3d 302 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1992

This court concurs with the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6). … Brown and Resnick, JJ., separately dissent.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sanz

128 Ohio St. 3d 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2011

V(4)(G), we reject the board’s finding that respondent has violated that rule. See Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan

58 Ohio St. 3d 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1991

We accept the findings of the board that respondent did not know of the fraud perpetrated on the court at the time of the trial in the Shaker Heights Municipal Court. … Brown, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Allen v. Board of Elections

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1959

Patton, v. Bazzell et al., Board of Elections of Lawrence County, 161 Ohio St., 344 , 119 N. … Hanna, v. Lake County Board of Elections, ante, 9. In Koehler, Jr., v. Board of Elections of Butler County, 125 Ohio St., 251 , 181 N.

American Humanist Ass'n v. Board of Tax Appeals

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 545 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1963

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed on authority of American Issue Publishing Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 137 Ohio St., 264 , and Hubbard Press v. Glander, Tax Commr., 156 Ohio St., 170 .

State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.

11 Ohio St. 3d 46 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1984

Eltra Corp., v. Indus. … Company, v. Indus. Comm. (1976), 49 Ohio App. 2d 351 [ 3 O.O.3d 322 ], is misplaced.