Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.19s

  • State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Beachwood v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

    62 Ohio St. 3d 167 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1991

    Bank, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Carter v. Celebrezze

    63 Ohio St. 2d 326 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1980

    Schwartz, v. Brown (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 4 , paragraph two of the syllabus. … Greenland, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. O'Connor

    125 Ohio St. 387 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1932

    Crull, v. Eidgenoss, 108 Ohio St., 493 , 141 N. E., 277 ; State, ex rel. Kauffmann, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 111 Ohio St., 289 , 145 N. E., 329 ; State, ex rel. Waltz, v. Michell, 124 Ohio St., 161 , 177 N. E., 214 . … This case is wholly different from that of Koehler, Jr., v. Board of Elections of Butler County, ante, 251, 181 N.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Palmer v. State Board of Barber Examiners

    144 Ohio St. 577 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1945

    county an action, wherein this relatrix is appellant and the respondent is appellee, in which action the prayer of the petition reads as follows: “Wherefore, plaintiff prays that said findings, decision and orders of the Board … Akron Coal Co., v. Board of Directors of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 136 Ohio St., 485 , 26 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shields

    25 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

    Upon thorough review of the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, the court determines that ample evidence supports the board’s conclusion that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 6- … Brown, Douglas and Wolff, JJ., concur. Wolff, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Taxpayers for Westerville Schools v. Franklin County Board of Elections

    133 Ohio St. 3d 153 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2012

    Owens v. … DeRolph v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Lowe

    29 Ohio St. 2d 144 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1972

    The objections to such findings and to the recommendation of the board are overruled, and the recommendation of the board that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law is confirmed. … J., Schneider, Herbert, CorrigaN, Steen, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hammond v. Winder

    112 Ohio St. 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1925

    Bashore v. Brown, Treas., 108 Ohio St., 18 , 140 N. E., 489 ; City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck, 110 Ohio St., 82 , 143 N. E., 661 . … Board of County Commissioners, 264 U S., 450, 44 S. Ct., 385 , 68 L. Ed., 784 , decided April 7, 1924; Gorham Mfg. Co. v. State Tax Commission of N. Y., 265 *164 U. S., 265, 45 S. Ct., 80 , 69 L.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Tractor Supply Co. v. Lindley

    50 Ohio St. 2d 275 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1977

    Rule TX-11-03 lists several reasons, with subparts, for claiming an exemption or exception from the sales or use tax, and directs that the appropriate reason be inserted in the unit exemption certificate. 2 The board, in … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful, and therefore must be reversed. Decision reversed. O’Neill, C. J., Heebeut, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and LocheR, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ebersole v. Powell (Slip Opinion)

    141 Ohio St. 3d 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2014

    Morris v. … Seattle Title Trust Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Lucas County Republican Party Executive Committee v. Husted

    144 Ohio St. 3d 352 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2015

    Republican Executive Commt. v. Brown, 43 Ohio St.3d 184, 185, 540 N.E.2d 245 (1989). {¶ 25} The executive committee elected to seek a writ of mandamus. … Democratic Executive Commt. v. Brown, 39 Ohio St.3d 157, 162-163, 314 N.E.2d 376 (1974). R.C. 3501.07 requires a reasonable belief that a person is incompetent to serve on the elections board. State ex rel. Summit Cty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Massillon City School District Board of Education v. City of Massillon

    104 Ohio St. 3d 518 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 2004

    Co. v. Toledo (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 96, 102 , 543 N.E.2d 1188 . … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Babcock & Wilcox. Co. v. Kosydar

    48 Ohio St. 2d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1976

    Although taxpayer concedes that this subsection standing alone may justify the conclusion reached by the Board of Tax Appeals, taxpayer disputes the reliance of the board on the recent case of Citizens Financial Corp. v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Wright v. Weyandt

    50 Ohio St. 2d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1977

    Pressley, v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Relators’ argument that mandamus must lie with regard to across-the-board salary raises granted during their termination is -without merit. The terms of the release are clear.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Dublin v. Delaware County Board of Commissioners

    62 Ohio St. 3d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1991

    Mothers Against Drunk Drivers, v. Gosser, supra. … Kelley Co. v. Cleveland (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 150 , 61 O.O.2d 394 , 290 N.E.2d 562 , paragraph one of the syllabus. In M.J. Kelley Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Godles

    128 Ohio St. 3d 279 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2010

    See Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board recommended a public reprimand. Considering respondent’s long career with no previous disciplinary action, we agree with the board. See Cuyahoga Cty Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marble

    15 Ohio St. 3d 394 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

    After a careful examination and a review of the record in this case, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent’s actions, when considered altogether, necessitate that sanctions against … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Washington Mutual Insurance v. Reed

    20 Ohio St. 199 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1851

    . *176 E'eed and Brown prosecuted a writ of error to the Supreme Court. … See Hicks v. Pierson, 19 Ohio, 426; and see Bank of Virginia v. Bank of Chillicothe, 16 Ohio, 170; Acheson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Stocker

    47 Ohio St. 3d 46 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1989

    We concur with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimandéd. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jacquemin v. Union Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

    147 Ohio St. 3d 467 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2016

    JACQUEMIN ET AL. v. UNION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Jacquemin v. … Perry & Co. v. Licking Cty.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.