Case law

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Anderson

62 Ohio St. 3d 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1991

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Braddock

21 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1986

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact and conclusions of fact of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Robert L. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wroblewski

32 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1987

It is noted that respondent has acquiesced in the board’s recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Kroger Co. v. Lindley

56 Ohio St. 2d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1978

This erroneous conclusion by the board was the product of its appli *142 cation of the primary use test as expressed in Emery Industries v. Kosydar (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 34 . … Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. P. Brown, acting C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, Holmes and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Board of Lucas County Commissioners

63 Ohio St. 3d 749 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1992

Fenske, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. .

State ex rel. Ingold v. Ormet Corp.

39 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1988

Frigidaire Division, General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 35 Ohio St. 3d 105, 106 , 518 N.E. 2d 1194, 1196 . … Mitchell, v.

Cleveland Public Library v. Cuyahoga County Budget Commission

28 Ohio St. 3d 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1986

See Cleveland v. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent, with opinion. Sweeney, J., dissents. This statute has since been amended, effective September 11, 1985, and is thus inapplicable to this cause.

Interactive Information Systems, Inc. v. Limbach

18 Ohio St. 3d 309 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1985

The Board of Tax Appeals, prior to the instant case, has applied this analysis to the production of computer diskettes. In AccuRay Corp. v. … In Canton Malleable Iron Co. v.

In re the Election on the Issue of Zoning the Southeasterly Section of Swanton Township

2 Ohio St. 3d 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

Brown [1959], 80 Ohio Law Abs. 373 ) as well as in those cases where the election results have been confirmed (see, e.g., Woodward v. Brown [1959], 80 Ohio Law Abs. 373 ; Mehling v. Moorehead, supra). … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

King v. Garnes

36 Ohio St. 2d 187 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1973

However, an examination of the record discloses no evidence to show when the decision was, in fact, mailed, nor did the employer attempt to assert a date of mailing before the Board of Review. … BrowN and P. Broww, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wang

59 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1991

We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and in its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Cleveland v. City of Columbus

23 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1986

See DeLarmi v. Fort Lee (1975), 132 N.J. Super. 501 , 334 A. 2d 349 ; White v. Paterson (1975), 137 N.J. Super. 220 , 348 A. 2d 798 ; Ragner v. Zielke (1979), 86 Wis. 2d 542 , 273 N.W. 2d 304 ; Gooley v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Brettell v. Canestraro

32 Ohio St. 3d 190 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1987

Clink, v. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bartlett

39 Ohio St. 2d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1974

Indeed, in the board’s opinion, the conduct of respondent amounted to a fraud upon the court. # * *” We agree with these findings and conclusions of the board with regard to Specification No. 2 as recorded: “1. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of Education

97 Ohio St. 3d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2002

Shemo v. … Chubb v.

Director of Highways v. Olrich

5 Ohio St. 2d 70 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1966

Brown, J. … In re Appropration for Highway Purposes, 167 Ohio St. 463 ; Nichols v. City of Cleveland, 104 Ohio St. 19 ; Board of Education of Cleveland City School Dist. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton

59 Ohio St. 3d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1991

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Lindley

70 Ohio St. 2d 249 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1982

Hawthorn Mellody v. Lindley (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 47, 49 . See, also, 3535 Salem Corp. v. Lindley (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 210 ; Episcopal Parish v. Kinney (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 199 ; Citizens Financial Corp. v. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

148 Ohio St. 3d 499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2016

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-7466 COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … Smucker, L.L.C. v.

Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala

82 Ohio St. 3d 57 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1998

LAKE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. VALA. [Cite as Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala, 1998-Ohio-591.] … Brown, for relator. Joseph F. Vala, pro se. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 7} We accept the findings and conclusions of the board.