Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • Peoples Faith Chapel, Inc. v. Limbach

    18 Ohio St. 3d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1985

    The standard for review of decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals was set forth by this court in Buckeye Power, Inc. v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lacinak

    46 Ohio St. 2d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1976

    Upon a careful review of the findings of fact of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, as reflected by the record, this court is in full agreement that such findings of fact are justified by the record. … V(6) (a). Judgment accordingly. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Samkas v. Industrial Commission

    70 Ohio St. 2d 279 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1982

    Vaughn, v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Altekruse

    64 Ohio St. 3d 1212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1992

    V(7)(e) (now Section 6[B][5]) and ordered to pay board costs in the amount of $1,701.48. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Rieke v. Hausrod

    59 Ohio St. 2d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1979

    Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Education v. City of Youngstown

    84 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1998

    If it appears beyond doubt that the board is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, a peremptory writ should issue. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. … Network, Inc. v. Petro (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 261, 266 , 685 N.E.2d 1223 , 1228. Respondents also did not file anything in response to the board’s motion for a peremptory writ.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • American Chemical Society v. Kinney

    62 Ohio St. 2d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

    State v. Singer (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 103, 108 . … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. P. Brown and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Welo v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

    67 Ohio St. 3d 434 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1993

    Relator, Carol Welo, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondent Cuyahoga County Board of Elections (“board”) to accept her nominating petition and certify her as a candidate for Westlake City Council at a primary election … As a result, Welo no longer lived in the ward she was attempting to represent and, after a hearing on August 3, 1993, the board of elections rejected her petition for this reason.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of Elections

    62 Ohio St. 3d 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1991

    Senn, v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 173, 175 , 5 O.O.3d 381, 382 , 367 N.E.2d 879, 880 . In State, ex rel. Clinard, v. Greene Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • NFI Metro Center II Associates v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    78 Ohio St. 3d 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1997

    Strongsville Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 402 , 674 N.E.2d 696 . In each decision, the BTA stated: *107 “[The appraisers’] methodologies diverged in their income approach analysis. … Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 513, 516 , 660 N.E.2d 440 , 443; Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. Lindley (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 47 , 19 O.O.3d 234 , 417 N.E.2d 1257 , syllabus.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • M.S. Osher, M.D. & R.S. Kerstine, M.D., Inc. v. Limbach

    65 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1992

    The commissioner attempts to draw an analogy to Fritz v. Peck (1953), 160 Ohio St. 90 , 51 O.O. 5 , 113 N.E.2d 627 . … For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Beatty v. Akron City Hospital

    67 Ohio St. 2d 483 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1981

    to arbitration, and the board’s decision. … Brown, Strausbaugh, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents. Strausbaugh, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J. R.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Gebhart

    69 Ohio St. 2d 287 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1982

    As stated in Columbus Bar Assn. v. … After a review of the record, we concur in the recommendation of the board, and publicly reprimand respondent, David Edward Gebhart, for such acts. Judgment accordingly. W. Brown, Acting C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cappelletti v. Celebrezze

    64 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1980

    Vail, v. Fulton (1917), 97 Ohio St. 325 . At this late date, relators’ attack on the ballot title is also without merit. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

    67 Ohio St. 3d 605 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1993

    Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597 , 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed. Writ allowed. A.W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Ass'n v. Thorpe

    23 Ohio St. 3d 210 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1986

    YI(6) and V. We agree with the recommendation of the board that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

    38 Ohio St. 3d 338 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1988

    This court has thoroughly reviewed the instant record *340 and has found ample support for the board’s conclusions. We therefore adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Board of Education

    28 Ohio St. 2d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971

    The basic power of the General Assembly to make such requirements for employees of city school districts has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Karrick et al. v. … C. 143.08 (A) (7) which permits such a board to place in the unclassified service ‘ * * * such employees as are engaged in educational or research duties connected with the public school system * * V The General Assembly,

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Williamson v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

    11 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1984

    Halak, v. Cebula (1977), 49 Ohio St. 2d 291, 293 [ 3 O.O.3d 439 ]. See, also, State, ex rel. Raff, v. Pask (1933), 126 Ohio St. 633 , paragraph three of the syllabus. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Jaeger

    22 Ohio St. 3d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1986

    VI(6) and V. We agree with the recommendation of the board that the appropriate sanction for respondent’s conduct is an indefinite suspension. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.