Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.00s
Peoples Faith Chapel, Inc. v. Limbach
18 Ohio St. 3d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1985
The standard for review of decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals was set forth by this court in Buckeye Power, Inc. v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lacinak
46 Ohio St. 2d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1976
Upon a careful review of the findings of fact of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, as reflected by the record, this court is in full agreement that such findings of fact are justified by the record. … V(6) (a). Judgment accordingly. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Samkas v. Industrial Commission
70 Ohio St. 2d 279 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1982
Vaughn, v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Altekruse
64 Ohio St. 3d 1212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1992
V(7)(e) (now Section 6[B][5]) and ordered to pay board costs in the amount of $1,701.48. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Rieke v. Hausrod
59 Ohio St. 2d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1979
Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Education v. City of Youngstown
84 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1998
If it appears beyond doubt that the board is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, a peremptory writ should issue. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. … Network, Inc. v. Petro (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 261, 266 , 685 N.E.2d 1223 , 1228. Respondents also did not file anything in response to the board’s motion for a peremptory writ.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAmerican Chemical Society v. Kinney
62 Ohio St. 2d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980
State v. Singer (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 103, 108 . … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. P. Brown and Holmes, JJ., dissent.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. Welo v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
67 Ohio St. 3d 434 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1993
Relator, Carol Welo, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondent Cuyahoga County Board of Elections (“board”) to accept her nominating petition and certify her as a candidate for Westlake City Council at a primary election … As a result, Welo no longer lived in the ward she was attempting to represent and, after a hearing on August 3, 1993, the board of elections rejected her petition for this reason.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of Elections
62 Ohio St. 3d 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1991
Senn, v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 173, 175 , 5 O.O.3d 381, 382 , 367 N.E.2d 879, 880 . In State, ex rel. Clinard, v. Greene Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNFI Metro Center II Associates v. Franklin County Board of Revision
78 Ohio St. 3d 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1997
Strongsville Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 402 , 674 N.E.2d 696 . In each decision, the BTA stated: *107 “[The appraisers’] methodologies diverged in their income approach analysis. … Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 513, 516 , 660 N.E.2d 440 , 443; Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. Lindley (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 47 , 19 O.O.3d 234 , 417 N.E.2d 1257 , syllabus.
Cited 8 timesPublishedM.S. Osher, M.D. & R.S. Kerstine, M.D., Inc. v. Limbach
65 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1992
The commissioner attempts to draw an analogy to Fritz v. Peck (1953), 160 Ohio St. 90 , 51 O.O. 5 , 113 N.E.2d 627 . … For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished67 Ohio St. 2d 483 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1981
to arbitration, and the board’s decision. … Brown, Strausbaugh, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents. Strausbaugh, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J. R.
Cited 70 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Gebhart
69 Ohio St. 2d 287 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1982
As stated in Columbus Bar Assn. v. … After a review of the record, we concur in the recommendation of the board, and publicly reprimand respondent, David Edward Gebhart, for such acts. Judgment accordingly. W. Brown, Acting C.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Cappelletti v. Celebrezze
64 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1980
Vail, v. Fulton (1917), 97 Ohio St. 325 . At this late date, relators’ attack on the ballot title is also without merit. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
67 Ohio St. 3d 605 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1993
Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597 , 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed. Writ allowed. A.W.
Cited 1 timesPublished23 Ohio St. 3d 210 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1986
YI(6) and V. We agree with the recommendation of the board that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
38 Ohio St. 3d 338 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1988
This court has thoroughly reviewed the instant record *340 and has found ample support for the board’s conclusions. We therefore adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOhio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Board of Education
28 Ohio St. 2d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971
The basic power of the General Assembly to make such requirements for employees of city school districts has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Karrick et al. v. … C. 143.08 (A) (7) which permits such a board to place in the unclassified service ‘ * * * such employees as are engaged in educational or research duties connected with the public school system * * V The General Assembly,
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Williamson v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
11 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1984
Halak, v. Cebula (1977), 49 Ohio St. 2d 291, 293 [ 3 O.O.3d 439 ]. See, also, State, ex rel. Raff, v. Pask (1933), 126 Ohio St. 633 , paragraph three of the syllabus. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Jaeger
22 Ohio St. 3d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1986
VI(6) and V. We agree with the recommendation of the board that the appropriate sanction for respondent’s conduct is an indefinite suspension. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna