Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • In re Carcione

    125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

    On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. … Upon reapplication, Collette Jeanine Carcione shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, she shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. Brown, C.J., not participating.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Ciepiel

    125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

    On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. … Upon reapplication, Mark Joseph Ciepiel shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. Brown, C.J., not participating.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Soller v. West Muskingum Local Board of Education

    29 Ohio St. 2d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1972

    C. 3319.081(A), as amended, because he was timely notified by the board, according to the provisions of R. C. 3319.083, of its intention not to re-employ him. … , would want to give each board at least *151 one opportunity to terminate the employment of anyone with less than three years of service.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Miller

    61 Ohio St. 2d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1980

    Kozak v. Lutheran Children’s Aid Society (1955), 164 Ohio St. 335 . This court noted in the Kozak case, at page 340, that: “ * * *[R. … Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Paul W. Brown, J., concurring in the judgment. I agree with the discussion of the issue herein, but conclude that the issue is raised by a party who has no standing.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Dublin City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

    147 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 2016

    SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-3025 DUBLIN CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … See Rhodes v. Hamilton Cty.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. McSalters v. Mikus

    62 Ohio St. 2d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1980

    Board of County Commissioners, v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • N. Perry v. Lake Cty. Budget Comm.

    70 Ohio St. 3d 46 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1994

    VILLAGE OF NORTH PERRY, APPELLANT, v. LAKE COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as N. Perry v. Lake Cty. Budget Comm., 1994-Ohio-28.] … Cincinnati v. Budget Comm. of Hamilton Cty. (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 252, 253, 520 N.E. 2d 232, 234. In Budget Comm. of Brown Cty. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Capital City Excavating Co. v. Industrial Commission

    54 Ohio St. 2d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1978

    Brown, J. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ogan v. Teater

    54 Ohio St. 2d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1978

    Because this court will not substitute its judgment for the board’s where there is some evidence supporting the board’s order, see *247 State, ex rel. Bd. of Edn. of Whithall, v. … Brown, P. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur. R.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Rio Indal, Inc. v. Lindley

    62 Ohio St. 2d 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1980

    Brown, J. R. … Since appellee failed to sustain its burden to show entitlement to a deduction, Higbee Co. v. Evatt (1942), 140 Ohio St. 325 , the decision of the board is reversed. Decision reversed. *287 Celebrezze, C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Tarmey

    4 Ohio St. 3d 81 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1983

    the court concurs in the recommendation of the board. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, O’Neill and Hendrickson, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for C. Brown, J. Hendrickson, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for J.P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. DeFrancis

    68 Ohio St. 2d 180 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1981

    has previously been found by this court to be in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility for which he was publicly reprimanded on January 30, 1981, and upon examination of the record and the findings of the board … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gruhler

    16 Ohio St. 3d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1985

    For the following reasons, we adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation that respondent be suspended for one year. In Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. Kiger

    42 Ohio St. 3d 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

    Brown, v. Canton (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 182 , 18 O.O. 3d 401, 414 N.E. 2d 412 . Therefore, relators have demonstrated the elements for a writ of mandamus to issue. State, ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc., v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 169 timesPublished
  • Streetsboro Education Ass'n v. Streetsboro City School District Board of Education

    68 Ohio St. 3d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1994

    Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-University Hts. … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Falls City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 193 , 574 N.E.2d 442 , paragraph two of the syllabus; Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Royce v. Smith

    68 Ohio St. 2d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1981

    In Fankhauser v. … Brown and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent in part. R.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Deerhake v. Limbach

    47 Ohio St. 3d 44 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1989

    In Lawson Milk Co. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Holman Rentals, L.L.C. v. Wood County Board of Revision

    144 Ohio St. 3d 125 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2015

    . {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Ginter v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 340 , 2015-Ohio-2571 , 37 N.E.3d 1207 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Switzer v. Kosydar

    36 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1973

    Evidence adduced before the board also indicated that, until recently, the state has never attempted to tax this type of sale by other fish haulers. In Recording Devices v. Bowers (1963), 174 Ohio St. 518 , 190 N. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CoerigaN, SteeN, Celebeezze, W. BeowN and P. BrowN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Olivito

    110 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2006

    Bar Assn. v. … Kravitz, Gatterdam & Brown, L.L.C., Max Kravitz, William Bluth, Paula Brown, and Jacob Cairns, for respondent. Judgment accordingly.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.