Case law

In re Carcione

125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. … Upon reapplication, Collette Jeanine Carcione shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, she shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. Brown, C.J., not participating.

In re Ciepiel

125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. … Upon reapplication, Mark Joseph Ciepiel shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. Brown, C.J., not participating.

In re Cunningham

59 Ohio St. 2d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1979

See, e. g., Gishwiler v. *106 Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; Clark v. Bayer (1877), 32 Ohio St. 299 ; Children’s Home of Marion County v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Juv. R. 29 reads, in pertinent part: “(E) Initial procedure upon entry of a denial.

In re Application of Reynolds

127 Ohio St. 3d 331 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

conducted. {¶ 4} The board concurred in the panel’s recommendation that the applicant be disapproved. … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ David E.

Geiler Co. v. Lindley

66 Ohio St. 2d 514 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1981

C. 5739.01(A), includes appellant. 3 Appellant seeks to distinguish our holding in Decor Carpet Mills v. Lindley (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 152 . In Decor Carpet Mills , this court, relying on R. … Accordingly, the decision of the board being reasonable and lawful is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. R.

Summit Steel Corp. v. Kosydar

41 Ohio St. 2d 81 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1975

And, the board held, the Tax Commissioner, in determining the value of appellant’s stock under R. C: 5733.05, is not required to make a complete audit of appellant’s records. … J., Hebbebt, Corbigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W, Brown and P. Brown, JJ-, concur, That the parties to the merger considered the effects of their merger upon the “surplus” accounts is evidenced by the agreement itself.

State ex rel. Soller v. West Muskingum Local Board of Education

29 Ohio St. 2d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1972

C. 3319.081(A), as amended, because he was timely notified by the board, according to the provisions of R. C. 3319.083, of its intention not to re-employ him. … , would want to give each board at least *151 one opportunity to terminate the employment of anyone with less than three years of service.

Beulah Park Jockey Club, Inc. v. Garnes

36 Ohio St. 2d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1973

The board's reference to 1956 relates to a decision of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in Race Tracks of Ohio v. … BrowN, JJ., concur. Celebrezze and W. BrowN, JJ., dissent. R.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gruhler

16 Ohio St. 3d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1985

For the following reasons, we adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation that respondent be suspended for one year. In Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

In re Miller

61 Ohio St. 2d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1980

Kozak v. Lutheran Children’s Aid Society (1955), 164 Ohio St. 335 . This court noted in the Kozak case, at page 340, that: “ * * *[R. … Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Paul W. Brown, J., concurring in the judgment. I agree with the discussion of the issue herein, but conclude that the issue is raised by a party who has no standing.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. DeFrancis

68 Ohio St. 2d 180 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1981

has previously been found by this court to be in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility for which he was publicly reprimanded on January 30, 1981, and upon examination of the record and the findings of the board … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Royce v. Smith

68 Ohio St. 2d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1981

In Fankhauser v. … Brown and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent in part. R.

In re Hauch

125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. … Upon reapplication, James Victor Hauch shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. Brown, C.J., not participating.

N. Perry v. Lake Cty. Budget Comm.

70 Ohio St. 3d 46 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1994

VILLAGE OF NORTH PERRY, APPELLANT, v. LAKE COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as N. Perry v. Lake Cty. Budget Comm., 1994-Ohio-28.] … Cincinnati v. Budget Comm. of Hamilton Cty. (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 252, 253, 520 N.E. 2d 232, 234. In Budget Comm. of Brown Cty. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

62 Ohio St. 3d 178 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1991

We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recom *180 mended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. … Brown, J., dissents.

In re Adoption of Schoeppner

46 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1976

Thus, although the fact of imprisonment might, when combined with other factors, lend support to a finding of a wilful failure to support, Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Staat (1970), 287. Minn. 501, 178 N. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Capital City Excavating Co. v. Industrial Commission

54 Ohio St. 2d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1978

Brown, J. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Olivito

110 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2006

Bar Assn. v. … Kravitz, Gatterdam & Brown, L.L.C., Max Kravitz, William Bluth, Paula Brown, and Jacob Cairns, for respondent. Judgment accordingly.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall

131 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall, 131 Ohio St.3d 222, 2012-Ohio-783.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HALL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall, 131 Ohio St.3d 222, 2012-Ohio-783.] … Bar Assn. v.

Dublin City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

147 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 2016

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-3025 DUBLIN CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … See Rhodes v. Hamilton Cty.