Case law

State ex rel. Zito v. Industrial Commission

64 Ohio St. 2d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1980

Whitman, v. Indus. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.

Shutter Bug, Inc. v. Kosydar

40 Ohio St. 2d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1974

Brown, J. B. … Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and we affirm. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbeet, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Association of Cuyahoga Cty. Teachers of Trainable Retarded v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation

6 Ohio St. 3d 190 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983

General Box Co. (1949), 82 N.L.R.B. 678 ; Mar-Jac Poultry Co. (1962), 136 N.L.R.B. 785 ; Brooks v. N.L.R.B. (1954), 348 U.S. 96 ; Bums v. Int’l Security Serv., Inc. [sic N.L.R.B. v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Robinson

59 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1979

. * * *” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., coneur.

State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax Appeals

26 Ohio St. 2d 161 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1971

To support the board’s action, respondent board cites Steward v. … Park Investment Co., v. Board of Tax Appeals. 175 Ohio St. 410 ; Koblenz v. Board of Revision. 5 Ohio St. 2d 214 ; and Goldberg v. Board of Revision, 7 Ohio St. 2d 139 , approved and followed.) “2.

Doelker v. State

12 Ohio St. 2d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1967

Atkins, v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy (Mo. App. 1961), 351 S. W. 2d 483 . But, see contra Murrill v. State Board of Accountancy (1950), 97 Cal. … Because of this, it is not necessary for us to consider whether the accountancy board had any right to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Judgment affirmed. Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Cuyahoga County v. State Personnel Board of Review

82 Ohio St. 3d 496 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1998

Serv., Office of Collective Bargaining v. State Emp. … Rogers v. Brown (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 408, 410-411 , 686 N.E.2d 1126, 1128 .

Parker v. Burgett

29 Ohio St. 513 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

Glenn v. Waddell, 23 Ohio St. 605 . … That this claim is not well founded, we regard as already *523 settled by the principles decided in Miller v. Graham, 17 Ohio St. 1 , and in Burgett v. Norris, 25 Ib. 809.

State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Dayton

49 Ohio St. 2d 219 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1977

Brown, J. … Brown, J., dissents. Dayton v. Fraternal Order of Police (Civil No. C-3-75-143, December 1975) the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western División, listed related cases, including F. O.

Sykes v. Kreiger

32 Ohio St. 2d 132 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1972

E. 2d 846 ; Guerrieri v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 75 , 204 N. E. 2d 60 ; In re Copely (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 35 , 278 N. … J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur. These cases, as did the one at bar, arose prior to the announcement of Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U. S. 471 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 484 .

Budget Commission v. Board of Tax Appeals

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 98 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1964

The factors governing its decision as detailed by the board, including needs, correspond with the pronouncements of this court in the cases of Thatcher, Aud., v. City of Columbus, 139 Ohio St., 473 , 40 N. … E. (2d), 921; City of Troy v. Miami County, 168 Ohio St., 418 , 155 N. E. (2d), 909; and City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget Comm., 174 Ohio St., 163 , 187 N. E. (2d), 42.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Noel

134 Ohio St. 3d 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2012

v. … The board also considered four analogous cases in which the same penalty had been levied. See, e.g., Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v.

Denison University v. Board of Tax Appeals

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1962

City of Cleveland (1945), 145 Ohio St., 347, 351 ; and Board of Edn. of City School Dist. of City of Cincinnati v. Board of Tax Appeals (1948), 149 Ohio St., 564, 567 . … See, also, Board of Edn. of City School Dist. of City of Cincinnati v. Board of Tax Appeals, supra, and paragraph four of the syllabus of Wehrle Foundation v. Evatt, Tax Commr., supra.

Board of Education of the City School District v. Juergens

110 Ohio St. 667 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1924

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed for the reason that the *668 election of the defendant in error by the board of education of the … city school district of the city of West P'ark, for the year 1922, as clerk of that board, did not confer upon him any function of sovereignty or constitute him an officer within the prohibition of Section 20, Article II

State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami County Board of Commissioners

104 Ohio St. 3d 350 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2004

Shemo v. … Co. v.

Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Clermont County Board of Revision

97 Ohio St. 3d 1219 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2002

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. … Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165 , 2002-Ohio-4033 , 772 N.E.2d 1160 , the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set forth in R.C. 5717.01.

Whitacre v. Waggoner

133 Ohio St. 409 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1938

Brents v. Smith, 250 Ill., 521 , 95 N. E., 484 ; McMahon v. Polk, 10 S. D., 296, 73 N. W., 77 , 47 L. R. A., 830, and annotation at page 843; Sweetser v. Pacheco, 172 Cal., 137 , 155 P., 639 ; Fullarton v. … Brown: We object to that. “The Court: Objection overruled. “Mr. Brown: Exception. “Mr.

Central Ohio Joint Vocational School District Board of Education v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

21 Ohio St. 3d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1986

‘The decision of purely factual questions is primarily within the province of the referee and the board of review.’ Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511, 518 [ 35 O.O. 101 ].” … Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., concurs in judgment only. Wright, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Thomas v. Tuscarawas County Liquor Licensing Board

94 Ohio St. 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1916

decision of the state board sustaining the action of the county board was received by the latter. … Krauss, v.

State ex rel. Brookpark Entertainment, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

60 Ohio St. 3d 44 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1991

O’Grady, v. Brown (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 17 , 2 O.O. 3d 94, 356 N.E. 2d 296 ; State, ex rel. Glass, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.