Case law

State ex rel. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Brown

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1956

Its only object is to secure an order that the board proceed with its clearly defined legal duty to hear the appeal. *525 As was said in the case of State, ex rel. Davey, Governor, v. … There is no provision for re *526 manding a cause to the commission or a board where that board has unlawfully declined to hear an appeal from the administrator.

Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

44 Ohio St. 2d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1975

Also, the board is vested with wide discretion in determining the weight to be given to evidence and the credibility of witnesses which come before the board (American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, 0. J., Herbert, Corrigan-, Stern- and P. Brown-, JJ., concur.

Engineers Club v. Donahue

8 Ohio St. 2d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1966

The decision of the board is affirmed on authority of Kirtland Country Club Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 174 Ohio St. 116 . Decision affirmed. Taft, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Rutherford and Brown, JJ., concur. Rutherford, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Schneider, J.

West Bay Manor Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

73 Ohio St. 3d 568 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995

Corp. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 489, 491 , 628 N.E.2d 1362, 1364 ; Crow v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 55, 57 , 552 N.E.2d 892, 893 ; and Zindle v. Summit Cty. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and it is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Akron Bar Assn. v. DeLoach

133 Ohio St. 3d 329 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 2012

V(9). Akron Bar Assn. v. … . {¶ 7} As the board noted, case law also supports a public reprimand. The board cites Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

Roberts & Sons, Inc. v. Kosydar

42 Ohio St. 2d 495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975

See Kloepfers v. Peck (1953), 158 Ohio St. 577 , 110 N. E. 2d 560 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, being unreasonable and unlawful, is, therefore, reversed. Decision reversed. . O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

American District Telegraph Co. v. Porterfield

15 Ohio St. 2d 92 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1968

These cases are unlike Pla Mor, Inc., v. Glander, 149 Ohio St. 295 , or Randall Park Jockey Club, Inc., v. Peck, 162 Ohio St. 245 , where the tangible items transferred actually performed the desired service. … Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Berk

132 Ohio St. 3d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 2012

Disciplinary Counsel v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LANZINGER and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent and would impose an 18-month suspension with 12 months stayed and a two-year period of monitored probation following the suspension, as recommended by the board.

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Board of County Commrs.

149 Ohio St. 489 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1948

Horvitz Co., v. Sours, Dir., 142 Ohio St., 591 , 53 N. E. (2d), 498. … Baker, v. Hanefeld, Dir., 134 Ohio St., 540 , 18 N. E. (2d), 404. A writ of mandamus is denied. Writ denied. Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Gray v. Trustees, Monclova Township

38 Ohio St. 2d 310 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974

See Curtiss v. Cleveland (1957), 166 Ohio St. 509 , 144 N. E. 2d 177 . … Willott v. Beachwood (1964), 175 Ohio St. 557 , 197 N. E. 2d 201 ; Curtiss v. Cleveland (1959), 170 Ohio St. 127 , 163 N. E. 2d 682 .

State ex rel. Nauth v. Dirham (Slip Opinion)

161 Ohio St. 3d 365 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2020

Davis v. Pub. Emps. … Brown, for relators. Gregory A. Huber, Medina Law Director, for respondent Keith H.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer

35 Ohio St. 3d 261 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1988

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. While we adopt the findings of the board, we reject the sanction recommended. … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.

State Ex Rel. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas

126 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2010

Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 126 Ohio St.3d 111, 2010-Ohio-2467.] THE STATE EX REL. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS v. … ’s counsel for the construction of Paul Brown Stadium.

Board of Education of City School District v. City of Columbus

118 Ohio St. 295 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1928

The board of education defended on the ground that Section 3963, General Code, exempts boards of education from such charges. … The controversy is in every essential detail identical with the case of City of East Cleveland v. Board of Education of City School District of East Cleveland, 112 Ohio St., 607 , 148 N. E., 350 , decided May 26, 1925.

Refreshment Services Co. v. City of Cleveland

63 Ohio St. 2d 89 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1980

Shafer, v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents in case No. 79-630 and concurs in case No. 79-716. Bell, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. R.

Gerzeny v. Richfield Township

62 Ohio St. 2d 339 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1980

Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Strausbaugh, JJ., concur. Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment. Strausbaugh, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J. … Petersburg v. Schweitzer (Dist. Ct. App. Fla. 1974), 297 So. 2d 74, 77 . See, also, Richmond v. Murdock (1975), 70 Wis. 2d 642 , 235 N.W. 2d 497 ; Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties (1973), 32 Cal.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lisner

65 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1981

After an examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings of fact and the recommendation of the board of commissioners, and it is hereby ordered that respondent be permanently disbarred … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board

89 Ohio St. 3d 477 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2000

DeBoe v. Indus. Comm. (1954), 161 Ohio St. 67 , 53 O.O. 5 , 117 N.E.2d 925 . … Curry v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 268 , 12 O.O.3d 271 , 389 N.E.2d 1126 ; Hartzell Propeller, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1989), 65 Ohio App.3d 575 , 584 N.E.2d 1263 ; Martin v. Franklin Cty.

TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Surveyors

172 Ohio St. 3d 225 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2022

Co. v. Walker, 29 Ohio St.2d 173, 180-182, 281 N.E.2d (1972) (deferring to EEOC guidelines to determine whether federal statute preempted state law); State ex rel. Brown v. … Burwell, 576 U.S. 473, 485, 135 S.Ct. 2480, 192 L.Ed.2d 483 (2015), quoting Food & Drug Adm. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159, 120 S.Ct. 1291, 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget Commission

31 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1987

Pressley, v. Indus. … Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., dissents. Douglas, J., dissents with opinion.