Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Village of Gates Mills v. Board of Park Commrs.

    148 Ohio St. 7 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1947

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Horky v. Public Employees' Retirement Board

    144 Ohio St. 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945

    The retirement board shall determine the amount and manner of payment of such contributions.” … -59, General Code, provides, in part: ‘ ‘ On and after January 1, 1939, any member, except a new member with less than five years of service, who has attained sixty years of age, may retire by filing with the retirement board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Deputy State Supervisors of Elections v. Johnson

    65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1901

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education

    128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1934

    Snapp, v. Goul, 97 Ohio St., 259 , and State, ex rel. Brenner, v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, 97 Ohio St., 336. Writ allowed. Weygandt, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bradley v. Board of County Commissioners

    128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1934

    Jewett, v. Sayre, Aud., 91 Ohio St., 85 , 109 N. E., 636 . … Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County v. Mighels, 7 Ohio St., 109 ; Buchanan Bridge Co. v. Campbell, 60 Ohio St., 406 , 54 N. E., 372 ; Board of County Commissioners of Clark County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Rooks v. Grandview Heights Board of Education

    174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hill v. Board of Fire Commissioners

    26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

    He appeared before the board and requested an investigation, and this was a waiver of notice in writing, and gave the board complete jurisdiction of the case in every respect. … Under these circumstances the board found the relator incompetent and discharged him.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Belinky v. Board of County Commissioners

    171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1960

    There is no question that boards of county commissioners have, and under our present system of county government must *8 have, a wide discretion in the allocation of available funds to the various offices of the county. … But the discretion reposing in boards of county commissioners is not without limit. Certain duties are imposed upon them by legislative command and by the needs of a complex society.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Village of Richmond Heights v. Board of County Commrs.

    171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Loofbourrow v. Board of County Commrs.

    167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1957

    With that substitution, it is incumbent upon the Board of County Commissioners to ascertain the accuracy of the limits described, as it admittedly did here. … As to the remaining language of (D), requiring the Board of County Commissioners to find that the limits are “not unreasonably large or small,” and as to (I), the exercise of the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland & Mahoning Valley Ry. Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morgan County Budget Commission v. Board of Tax Appeals

    175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 225 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1963

    board within the meaning of Section 5717.04. … Should a local subdivision refuse to comply voluntarily with an order of the Board of Tax Appeals, the board may resort to the courts to compel obedience.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Fanger v. Board of Public Works

    42 Ohio St. (N.S.) 607 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

    As was said in Hubbard v. … Hubbard v. Toledo, 21 Ohio St. 379 ; Elevator Co. v. Cin cinnati, 30 Ohio St. 629 ; Fox v. Cincinnati, 33 Ohio St. 492 ; Same case, 104 U. S.; State v. Railway, 37 Ohio St. 157 . Writ refused.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Finley v. County Board of Education

    124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 324 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1931

    of education of the Guernsey county school district on July 19, 1930; that the board of education of Guernsey county refused and still refuses to make such transfer; and prays for a writ of mandamus ordering such board of … The petition filed with the county board of education of Guernsey county, including territory located in two separate township rural school districts, was not sufficient either to invoke the jurisdiction of the county board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reid v. Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

    155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1951

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hoskins v. Ohio Board of Administration

    92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 457 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1915

    The state board of administration, having requested the state civil service commission of Ohio to furnish it a list of names of persons eligible for appointment to the position of superintendent of the state school for the … As a matter of course, the board of administration would have the right to take into consideration the physical condition of the applicants in making its selection from the certified list.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Variety Iron Works Co. v. Western Straw Board Co.

    87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1912

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Marietta Transfer & Storage Co.

    75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1906

    It was so decided in 1857 in The Commissioners of Hamilton County v. … In Finch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bushnell v. Board of County Commissioners

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 389 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1923

    .: Sections 242 and 7535, General Code, do not authorize the Board of County Commissioners to build bridges other' than on established roads. … Such board is without power to connect two state or county roads by gridge without first laying out and acquiring a road connecting such state or county roads.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.