Case law

Gasper Township Board of Trustees v. Preble County Budget Commission

119 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 8, 2008

Id., citing Queen City Valves, Inc. v. Peck (1954), 161 Ohio St. 579 , 584, 53 O.O. 430 , 120 N.E.2d 310 , and Am. Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. … Corp. v.

State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. Lucas County Board of Elections

130 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 9, 2011

Coble v. Lucas Cty. … O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in judgment. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Potten v. Kuth

61 Ohio St. 2d 321 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1980

Brittain, v. Board of Agriculture (1917), 95 Ohio St. 276 ; State, ex rel. Bay, v. Witter (1924), 110 Ohio St. 216, 221 . Whether an agency substantially complies must be decided on a case-by-case basis. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. In Kennedy’s case, the hearing examiner implicitly acknowledged that there was a lack of funds by not basing his decision upon a failure to prove a lack of funds.

In re Appeal of Bass Lake Community, Inc.

5 Ohio St. 3d 141 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1983

To that extent, the 1980 amendments clearly overruled the prior holdings in Weber v. Williams, supra, and Eaton v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Home Care Pharmacy, Inc. v. Creasy

67 Ohio St. 2d 342 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

Parrott, v. Board of Public Works (1881), 36 Ohio St. 409 . For the foregoing reasons, relators’ request for the issuance of a writ of mandamus is denied. 2 Writ denied. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. In view of our holding, we need not address relators’ request to certify this cause as a class action.

State ex rel. Brilliant Electric Sign Co. v. Industrial Commission

57 Ohio St. 2d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1979

Capital City Excavating Co., v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney and Connors, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., concurs in the judgment only. Connors, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J.

Heimerl v. Lindley

63 Ohio St. 2d 309 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1980

Gahanna Heights, Inc., v. Porterfield (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 189, 190 . Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube, supra. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, being neither unreasonable nor unlawful, is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert and P.

Otterson v. Youngstown City School District Board of Education

44 Ohio St. 2d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1975

Peake, v. Bd. of Edn. (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 119 . Based upon that decision, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Judgment reversed. CoRRigan, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer

136 Ohio St. 3d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 4, 2013

Bar Assn. v. Brown, 124 Ohio St.3d 530, 2010-Ohio- 580, 925 N.E.2d 112 (12-month suspension, stayed); Toledo Bar Assn. v. Farah, 125 Ohio St.3d 455, 2010-Ohio-2116, 928 N.E.2d 1097 (same). … Brown at ¶ 16.

State ex rel. Calhoun v. Scioto County Board of Elections

36 Ohio St. 3d 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1988

Newdick, v. O’Leary (1948), 149 Ohio St. 440 , 37 O.O. 117 , 79 N.E. 2d 126 , we underscored this point. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Lowe

67 Ohio St. 2d 335 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR-1-102 (A) (4) and (6), DR-1-102 (A)(3), (4) … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Hawkins v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

28 Ohio St. 2d 4 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1971

Kroeger, v. Leonard (1949), 151 Ohio St. 197 , and Stern v. Board of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 175 , both of which discuss substantial compliance. … Brown (1962), 173 Ohio St. 317 , which we feel is dispositive of the case at bar.

Ashland County Board of Commissioners v. Ohio Department of Taxation

63 Ohio St. 3d 648 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1992

Co. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. . In Sawicki v.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Board of Education

99 Ohio St. 3d 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 2003

Network, Inc. v. … Wallace v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 431, 433 , 732 N.E.2d 960 ; State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Nichols

61 Ohio St. 3d 546 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1991

In objections to the board’s report, relator argues that the evidence substantiates disciplinary violations in addition to those found by the board. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Mid-States Terminal, Inc. v. Lucas County Board of Revision

76 Ohio St. 3d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1996

In Shawnee Twp. v. Allen Cty. … relative to appeals from the Board of Tax Appeals.”

Syro Steel Co. v. Kosydar

34 Ohio St. 2d 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1973

As stated in Gahanna Heights, Inc., v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

AERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

127 Ohio St. 3d 44 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2010

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2007-A-764 and 2008-A-157. __________________ BROWN, C.J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA … The school board regards Cleveland Mun. School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Wolf v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of Education

52 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1990

In Walker v. Lockland City School Dist. … They further contend that the granting of supplemental contracts is entirely within the school board’s discretion and cite Ballard v.

City of Toledo v. Lucas County Budget Commission

33 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1973

Brown, J. Appellee’s motion for dismissal must be overruled. R. … We therefore hold that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Corrigan, Celebrezze and W. Brown, JJ., concur.