Case law

Smith v. Fryfogle

70 Ohio St. 2d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1982

Maxwell, v. Schneider, supra, at 498. … Brown, Acting C. J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Milligan, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hines

133 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2012

Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

City of East Cleveland v. Board of County Commissioners

69 Ohio St. 2d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1982

The trial court also relied on language in Niehaus v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in the judgment.

State Ex Rel. Bell v. Madison County Board of Commissioners

128 Ohio St. 3d 357 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 2011

Bell v. Madison Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 128 Ohio St.3d 357, 2011-Ohio- 527.] THE STATE EX REL. BELL, APPELLANT, v. MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ET AL., APPELLEES. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Phillip Wayne Cramer, for appellant.

East Ohio Gas Co. v. Wood County Board of Elections

83 Ohio St. 3d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1998

Lynch v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 341, 342 , 686 N.E.2d 498, 499 ; see, also, State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery Cty. … The phrase “brief summary of its contents” refers to the zoning resolution, motion, or application passed or approved by the board of township trustees. *301 R.C. 519.12(H); State ex rel. O’Beirne v. Geauga Cty.

Bar Ass'n v. Schnittger

3 Ohio St. 3d 26 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1983

. * * *” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 [ 58 O.O.2d 151 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Groveport-Madison Local Education Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board

62 Ohio St. 3d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992

In South Community, Inc. v. State Emp. … Appellants cite Central Ohio Transit Auth. v.

State ex rel. Snyder v. Wheatcraft

37 Ohio St. 2d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1974

Those statutes contemplate the prompt hearing of a protest filed to local option election petitions and the prompt decision of that protest by a board of elections. … Brown and P. Brown, JJt, concur,

State ex rel. English v. Geauga County Board of Elections

52 Ohio St. 2d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1977

After providing that such amendments or supplements be initiated by the township rural zoning commission, by the board of township trustees, or by private landowners or lessees, the statute provides for a public hearing, … BrowN, Sweeney and Locher, J J., concur. ~W. Brown, J., not participating.

Maple Heights Teachers Ass'n v. Maple Heights Board of Education

6 Ohio St. 3d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

Just as R.C. 3317.14 required the board to grant Lambert a minimum of five years of service credit for her prior outside teaching experience, the companion section, R.C. 3317.13 (B), restricted the board to the maximum grant … Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., dissent. Hoffman, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for J. P. Celebrezze, J.

Pratt v. Coller

46 Ohio St. 2d 88 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1976

The record shows that the only evidence before the State Personnel Board of Review bearing on the duties of these deputies is included in a stipulation. … Brown,, JJ., concur. Corrigan and P. Brown, JJ., dissent on the basis of the dissenting opinion of Corrigan, J., in In re Termination of Employment (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 107, at 117 . Stern, J., dissents.

H. Hafner & Sons, Inc. v. Lindley

58 Ohio St. 2d 130 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1979

“'The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals dismissing the appeal on the ground of failure to comply with the mandatory jurisdictional statutory requirement is not unreasonable or unlawful. Kent Provision Co., Inc., v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals being neither unreasonable nor unlawful is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. BrowN, P. Beowk, Sweekey, Locher and Hoemes, JJ., concur.

DeMoise v. Dowell

10 Ohio St. 3d 92 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1984

Brown, J. … Brown, JJ., concur. Hot,mes and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

Loveland Education Ass'n v. Loveland City School District Board of Education

58 Ohio St. 2d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979

“The Supreme Court has declared that the Board is. vested with limited discretionary authority to negotiate- and to enter into a collective bargaining agreement with its teachers. See Dayton Teachers Assn. v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. P. Brown, J., dissents. Appellants refer to the provisions of R. C. 3318.20 and 3313.47 respectively. R.

Tele-Media Co. v. Lindley

70 Ohio St. 2d 284 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1982

The board is required to arrive at its own valuation in an appeal from the valuation assessed by the Tax Commissioner. Clark v. Glander (1949), 151 Ohio St. 229 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Sweeney and Holmes, JJ., dissent. The taxpayers refer to the sellers’ depreciated book value as the “historical cost.” Robert E.

Green Circle Growers, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of Revision

35 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1988

Brown, J. … The decision reached by the Board of Tax Appeals follows a growing line of precedent. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Beall

54 Ohio St. 2d 168 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1978

The board recommended that the respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. The matter is now before this court for consideration of the report of the board and relator’s objection to the findings. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., not participating.

First National Bank v. Kosydar

45 Ohio St. 2d 101 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1976

The Board of Tax Appeals, relying upon Southland Stores No. 3 v. … For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful, and is reversed. Decision reversed. O’Neal, O. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, W.'Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Lakeside Avenue Ltd. Partnership v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

75 Ohio St. 3d 540 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1996

Bd. of Revision v. … Contrary to the assertions of appellee Cleveland Board of Education, we find that the case at bar is distinguishable from this court’s holding in Cardinal Fed. S. & L. Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

State ex rel. Bogart v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

67 Ohio St. 3d 554 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1993

Citizens for a Better Beachwood v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 167 , 580 N.E.2d 1063 . … The parties do not argue the propriety of thus using the writ of mandamus in effect to enjoin the board of elections. We note there is precedent for such a use of the writ. See State ex rel. Burech v. Belmont Cty.