Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.42s

  • Keels v. Chapin & Chapin, Inc.

    5 Ohio St. 2d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1966

    Both the administrator and the Board of Review carefully differentiate between “any disability” and a “disability as a result of the accidental occurrence. ’ ’ In Carpenter v. … J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel.

    154 Ohio St. 3d 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2018

    Bar Assn. v. … Although several aggravating factors were present, including Brown’s prior discipline, selfish motive, and failure to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct, Brown’s misconduct differed from Engel’s in that it did

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Svete v. Board of Elections of Geauga County

    4 Ohio St. 2d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1965

    The first is that the board abused its discretion in deciding, contrary to the holding in State, ex rel. Leslie, v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert SchNeider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Wellington v. Mahoning County Board of Elections

    120 Ohio St. 3d 198 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2008

    Ltd. v. Lorain Cty. … Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63 , 2006-Ohio-1292 , 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 23 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gennaro Pavers, Inc. v. Kosydar

    38 Ohio St. 2d 174 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 15, 1974

    The Only issue presented to this court by the Tax Commissioner is that “a Court of Appeals does not have authority to remand a case to the Board of Tax Appeals for rehearing on the merits.” In Fiddler v. … BrowN, JJ., concur. G.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Rife v. Franklin County Board of Elections

    70 Ohio St. 3d 632 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1994

    Zonders v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 5, 7 , 630 N.E.2d 313, 314-315 . Rife argues that the board of elections disregarded the election laws in rejecting his referendum petition. … Hamilton v. Clinton Cty.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • New Winchester Gardens, Ltd. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    80 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1997

    In Superior’s Brand Meats, Inc. v. … Oil Co. v. Zangerle (1943), 141 Ohio St. 505 , 26 O.O. 82 , 49 N.E.2d 406 . In Thompson v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Cummins Property Services, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of Revision, 117 Ohio St. 3d 516 (2008)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Arlen v. State

    61 Ohio St. 2d 168 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1980

    In discussing the legislative intent for the existence of such board, this court, in Farrand v. … Department of Liquor Control v. Santucci (1969), 17 Ohio St. 2d 69 ; Doelker v. Accountancy Bd. (1969), 12 Ohio St. 2d 76 . A disciplinary action of the State Medical Board is under the restrictions of R. C.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Negin v. Board of Building & Zoning Appeals of the City of Mentor

    69 Ohio St. 2d 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1982

    Chapter 2506, from the denial of an application for a variance by a zoning board of appeals, there is a presumption that the board’s determination is valid, and the burden of showing invalidity of the board’s determination … Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., concurs in the judgment. Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Krings

    93 Ohio St. 3d 654 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2001

    Paul Brown Stadium project. … . {¶ 17} Under R.C. 307.023, the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners was authorized to construct Paul Brown Stadium.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gutierrez v. Trumbull County Board of Elections

    65 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1992

    He cites Hill v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Sheldon Road Associates, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    131 Ohio St. 3d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2012

    Assoc., L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 131 Ohio St.3d 201, 2012-Ohio-581.] SHELDON ROAD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2009-V-4083. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we confront an issue of the jurisdiction of county boards of revision

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Reinier

    58 Ohio St. 2d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 1979

    In Diebler v. … Brown, P. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J. dissents. Patton, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Society of the Precious Blood v. Board of Tax Appeals

    149 Ohio St. 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1948

    Bloch v. Board of Tax Appeals, 144 Ohio St., 414 , 59 N. E. (2d), 145. … American Committee of Rabbinical College of Telshe, Inc., v. Board of Tax Appeals, 148 Ohio St., 654 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

    88 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 2000

    We will set aside the board’s decision to uphold the protest and issue the requested writ of mandamus if Watson establishes that the board’s decision resulted from fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion, or clear disregard … Purdy v. Clermont Cty.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Transue & Williams v. Lindley

    54 Ohio St. 2d 351 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1978

    Ohio Children’s Society v. Porterfield (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 30, 33 . The determinations by the commissioner were basically factual in nature. (Cf. Statler Industries, Inc., v. … The decision of the board, being neither unreasonable nor unlawful, is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula County Board of Elections

    65 Ohio St. 3d 180 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1992

    . * * *” Clements v. Fashing (1982), 457 U.S. 957, 967-968 , 102 S.Ct. 2836, 2846 , 73 L.Ed.2d 508, 518-519 . In State ex rel. Brown v. Summit Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections

    68 Ohio St. 2d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1981

    Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11 . The action of a board of elections in placing issues on the ballot is not an exercise of quasi-judicial power. State, ex rel. Williams, v. … Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 13, 16 ; State, ex rel. O’Grady, v. Brown (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 17, 20 . *39 Accordingly, the writ is denied. Writ denied. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula County Board of Elections

    65 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1992

    Senn v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Lindley

    2 Ohio St. 3d 54 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

    Accordingly, we find the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals to be neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and it is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. See Sections 102(a)(6), 106, 201(d) and 202, Title 17, U.S. Code.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.