Case law

State ex rel. Svete v. Board of Elections of Geauga County

4 Ohio St. 2d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1965

The first is that the board abused its discretion in deciding, contrary to the holding in State, ex rel. Leslie, v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert SchNeider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Carter

40 Ohio St. 2d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1974

Accordingly, we confirm the board’s finding that respondent is guilty of misconduct as defined in Gov. R. V(5) (a), supra. … Brown, JJ., concur. In Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko

134 Ohio St. 3d 544 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 25} The board determined that the findings of Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer and Chief Justice Eric Brown as to the lack of claimed bias of Judge Markus are binding. See State v. … United States v. Brown, 72 F.3d 25, 29 (5th Cir.1995).

State ex rel. Burech v. Belmont County Board of Elections

19 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1985

Chevalier v. Brown (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 61, 63 ; State, ex rel. Senn, v. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 173, 174 [ 5 O.O.3d 381 ]; State, ex rel. Griffin, v. … Sheldon Gas Co., v. Bd. of Elections (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 49 [ 2 O.O.3d 166 ]. Prohibition, however, is only intended to control judicial or quasi-judicial action. In State, ex rel. Williams, v.

State ex rel. Barton v. Butler County Board of Elections

39 Ohio St. 3d 291 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1988

Patton, v. Myers (1933), 127 Ohio St. 95 , 186 N.E. 872 . This characterization applies equally to boards of elections in their review of such petitions. … Brown, JJ., concur. R.C. 3501.11 provides in part: “Each board of elections shall * * * “(K) Review, examine, and certify the sufficiency and validity of petitions and nomination papers * * *.”

State ex rel. Stevens v. Geauga County Board of Elections

90 Ohio St. 3d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2000

Herman v. … Ohio Gas Co. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 298, 301 , 699 N.E.2d 916, 918 , quoting State ex rel. Hamilton v. Clinton Cty.

Negin v. Board of Building & Zoning Appeals of the City of Mentor

69 Ohio St. 2d 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1982

Chapter 2506, from the denial of an application for a variance by a zoning board of appeals, there is a presumption that the board’s determination is valid, and the burden of showing invalidity of the board’s determination … Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., concurs in the judgment. Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent.

State Ex Rel. Hoag v. Lucas County Board of Elections

125 Ohio St. 3d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2010

Hoag v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 125 Ohio St.3d 49, 2010-Ohio-1629.] THE STATE EX REL. HOAG v. LUCAS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. Hoag v. Lucas Cty. … Insofar as there may have been conflicting evidence on the pertinent issues at the board’s hearing, we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the board. State ex rel. Eshleman v.

Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

155 Ohio St. 3d 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2018

SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-4746 ROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … Brown v.

State ex rel. Morrison v. Franklin County Board of Elections

63 Ohio St. 2d 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1980

Sullivan v. State (1932), 125 Ohio St. 387 ; Pierce v. Brushart, supra. None of these grounds for reversing the board is apparent, and its decision must stand. The writ is denied. Writ denied. Celebrezze, C. J., W. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. P. Brown, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections

68 Ohio St. 2d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1981

Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11 . The action of a board of elections in placing issues on the ballot is not an exercise of quasi-judicial power. State, ex rel. Williams, v. … Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 13, 16 ; State, ex rel. O’Grady, v. Brown (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 17, 20 . *39 Accordingly, the writ is denied. Writ denied. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C.

State ex rel. Rife v. Franklin County Board of Elections

70 Ohio St. 3d 632 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1994

Zonders v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 5, 7 , 630 N.E.2d 313, 314-315 . Rife argues that the board of elections disregarded the election laws in rejecting his referendum petition. … Hamilton v. Clinton Cty.

Knowlton Realty Co. v. Darke County Board of Revision

77 Ohio St. 3d 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1997

In Ratner v. Stark Cty. … Bd. of Revision v.

State ex rel. Ferguson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

45 Ohio St. 3d 355 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1989

Blake, v. Shoemaker (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 42, 43 , 4 OBR 86, 87, 446 N.E. 2d 169, 170 . Therefore, Ferguson has been deprived of no liberty interest upon which he can base a due-process claim. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Herbert v. Mitchell

136 Ohio St. 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1939

McCrehen, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 108 Ohio St., 454 , 141 N. E., 69 . In the syllabus of that case this court ruled as follows: “1. … McCrehen, v. Brown, Secy. of State, supra, in one respect.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel.

154 Ohio St. 3d 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2018

Bar Assn. v. … Although several aggravating factors were present, including Brown’s prior discipline, selfish motive, and failure to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct, Brown’s misconduct differed from Engel’s in that it did

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Osborne

1 Ohio St. 3d 140 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1982

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the *143 board of commissioners, we conclude there is ample evidence to justify the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), and DR 4-101(B)(3), … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Ohio Water Service Co. v. Alban

42 Ohio St. 2d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975

Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141 . For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. O’Neill, C. … J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze and W Brown, JJ., concur. P. Brown, J., dissents.

Phillips v. South Range Local School District Board of Education

45 Ohio St. 3d 66 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1989

Harless v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent. ADM is “based on membership in regular day classes during the first full school week in October.”

Arlen v. State

61 Ohio St. 2d 168 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1980

In discussing the legislative intent for the existence of such board, this court, in Farrand v. … Department of Liquor Control v. Santucci (1969), 17 Ohio St. 2d 69 ; Doelker v. Accountancy Bd. (1969), 12 Ohio St. 2d 76 . A disciplinary action of the State Medical Board is under the restrictions of R. C.