Case law

State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

72 Ohio St. 3d 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 1995

Smart v. McKinley (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 5, 6 , 18 O.O.3d 128, 129 , 412 N.E.2d 393, 394 ; see, also, State ex rel. Brown v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 166, 167-168 , 545 N.E.2d 1256, 1258 . … The board relies on Storegard v. Cuyahoga Cty.

State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Hts. City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

78 Ohio St. 3d 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1997

KABERT ET AL. v. SHAKER HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION. [Cite as State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Hts. City School Dist. … Tavenner v. Indian Lake Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 88, 578 N.E.2d 464; State ex rel. Brown v. Milton- Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21, 531 N.E.2d 1297.

Mullins v. Whiteway Manufacturing Co.

15 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1984

Rockwell Internatl., v. Ford (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 234 [ 15 O.O.3d 250 ], and Cadle v. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Kelly v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

70 Ohio St. 3d 413 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1994

Boards of elections are obligated to weigh evidence of a candidate’s qualifications, .and courts should not substitute their judgment for that of the board. State ex rel. Herdman v. Franklin Cty. … Flynn v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1955), 164 Ohio St. 193 , 57 O.O. 402 , 129 N.E.2d 623 , overruled in part on other grounds in State ex rel. Schenck v.

State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District Board

81 Ohio St. 3d 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1998

See Kiser v. … See Lawrence v.

Youngstown (City) v. Evans

7 Ohio Law. Abs. 703 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1929

State Ex Rel. Board of County Commrs. v. Casey

119 Ohio St. 403 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1928

Ohio Utilities Co. v. Collins

48 Ohio St. 2d 169 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976

Brown, J. The main issue raised by this cause is whether the Board of Tax Appeals’ determination that the Tax Commissioner lacks jurisdiction to grant an R. … Brown, JJ., concur. The holding in this cause is limited to that portion of R.

N & G Construction, Inc. v. Lindley

56 Ohio St. 2d 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1978

Appellant urges a reversal of the board’s determination, asserting as improper the board’s failure to recognize the existence of an agency relationship between appellant and the owner of the severed coal, the R & F Coal Company … Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. Leach, C. J., Herbert, Celekrezze, SweeNey and Locher, JJ., concur. W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment.

State ex rel. Fairfield County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Fairfield County Budget Commission

10 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1984

Appellees’ assertion of an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals is in conflict with Bd. of Mental Retardation v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. Lindley

1 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1982

We are limited to a determination from the record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful.” Citizens Financial Corp. *18 v. … Brown, Acting C.J., Milligan, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Milligan, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C.J.

State ex rel. Janasik v. Sarosy

12 Ohio St. 2d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1967

Ehring, v. … McGinley, v. Bliss et al., Board of Elections, 149 Ohio St. 329 , approved and followed.)”

State ex rel. Butler County Children Services Board v. Sage

95 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2002

Forsyth v. … Brown (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 194, 196 , 571 N.E.2d 724 ; Rath v. Williamson (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 419 , 583 N.E.2d 1308 .

Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

96 Ohio St. 3d 170 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 2002

The Hamilton County Court of Appeals misinterpreted our opinion in Elkem Metals Co., L.P. v. Washington Cty. … Soltesiz v. Tracy (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 477, 479 , 663 N.E.2d 1273 . This statute is clear and does not need interpretation.

State ex rel. Craig v. Scioto County Board of Elections

117 Ohio St. 3d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2008

Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63 , 2006-Ohio-1292 , 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 22 ; State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Smart v.

State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark County Board of Elections

83 Ohio St. 3d 490 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1998

the board certified the question in the petition to the November 3 election ballot. … Spencer v. E.

State ex rel. Oster v. Lorain County Board of Elections

93 Ohio St. 3d 480 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2001

Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery Cty. … See, also, Stone v.

State Ex Rel. Tremmel v. Erie County Board of Elections

123 Ohio St. 3d 452 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2009

Tremmel v. Erie Cty. Bd. of Elections, 123 Ohio St.3d 452, 2009-Ohio- 5773.] THE STATE EX REL. TREMMEL v. ERIE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Tremmel v. Erie Cty. … Rust v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 108 Ohio St.3d 139, 2005- Ohio-5795, 841 N.E.2d 766, ¶ 8; State ex rel. Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63, 2006-Ohio-1292, 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 23.

Berea City School Dist. v. Budget Comm. of Cuyahoga Co.

60 Ohio St. 2d 50 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1979

Brown, J. … The Board of Tax Appeals dismissed these appeals on the basis of this court’s opinion in Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 181 .

State ex rel. Lee v. Bellefontaine City Board of Education

17 Ohio St. 3d 124 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1985

Brown, J. The sole issue before the court involves the interpretation of R.C. 3319.11. … Hura, v. Bd. of Edn. (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 19, 21-22 [ 5 O.O.3d 10 ]. There is no dispute that relator had become eligible for a continuing contract.