Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.35s

  • State ex rel. Purola v. Cable

    48 Ohio St. 2d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1976

    Breckinridge was a duly.éleeted de jure member of the board. .. : ■ i . •. Under settled Ohio case law, Roman was at least a de facto member of the board of trustees. State, ex rel. Witten, v. … Brown, J.J., concur. ,. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Greco v. Roper

    145 Ohio St. 243 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1945

    Brown, v. Bd. of Edn. of City of Elyria, 139 Ohio St., 427, 443 , 40 N. … E. (2d), 913, 921, in this way: “Relatrix Brown qualified as a teacher entitled to a continuing- contract under the first proviso of Section 7690:2, General Code.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Lindley

    64 Ohio St. 2d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1980

    (Bd. of Revision v. Fodor, 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 , approved and followed.)” *33 The board did provide cogent reasons for rejecting the valuations offered by Westinghouse. 1 In Wheeling Steel Corp. v. … Hence, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. W. Brown and Dowd, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning Appeals

    31 Ohio St. 3d 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1987

    As the board’s decision was not appealed, it became a final judgment on the merits, whether or not erroneous, and was res judicata to identical future applications. Cf. LaBarbera v. … The board’s decision in this regard will not be questioned, absent a showing that the *264 decision was arbitrary, unreasonable or constituted an abuse of discretion. Consolidated Mgmt., Inc. v.

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • Estate of Ridley v. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation

    102 Ohio St. 3d 230 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2004

    Mitchell v. … Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hosp. & Health Ctr. (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 86, 92 , 529 N.E.2d 449 , citing Bennison v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Fincher v. Canton City School District Board of Education

    62 Ohio St. 3d 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1991

    Appellant asserts that the clause requires a plan established under R.C. 3307.35 to be open for application for an entire year, arguing that the Board’s application period fell impermissibly short of the one-year time frame … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Baldzicki v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

    90 Ohio St. 3d 238 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2000

    Thurn v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Christy v. Summit Cty.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese v. Kinney

    2 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

    In Episcopal Parish v. … Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Licking Cty. Court of Common Pleas

    91 Ohio St. 3d 1522 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2001

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections

    40 Ohio St. 3d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1988

    Pajestka, v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

    Cited 258 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Elsass v. Shelby County Board of Commissioners

    92 Ohio St. 3d 529 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2001

    See Goodin v. … See Turner v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of Elections

    90 Ohio St. 3d 229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2000

    Senn v. Cuyahoga Cty. … The board of elections accepted the second filing. We granted a writ of prohibition and ordered the board of elections to remove the candidate’s name from the ballot.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • City of Middleburg Heights v. Ohio Board of Building Standards

    65 Ohio St. 3d 510 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1992

    City of Middleburg Heights, Appellee, v. Ohio Board of Building Standards, Appellant. [Cite as Middleburg Hts. v. Ohio Bd. of Bldg. Standards (1992), Ohio St.3d .] … Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Banbury Village, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    53 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1990

    The United States Supreme Court, in Allied Stores of Ohio v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Lakeview Local School District Board of Education

    63 Ohio St. 3d 380 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1992

    Boards of education, as creatures of statute, have no more authority than that conferred upon them by statute, or what is clearly implied therefrom. See, e.g., Wolf v. Cuyahoga Falls City School Dist. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ferrone v. Medina County Board of Revision

    105 Ohio St. 3d 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 2005

    Fawn Lake Apts. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Throckmorton v. Hamilton Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brinda v. Lorain County Board of Elections

    115 Ohio St. 3d 299 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2007

    Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Steele v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service Comm.

    67 Ohio St. 2d 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1981

    Alford, v. … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Kennedy

    151 Ohio St. 485 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1949

    Bigelow, v. Butterfield et al., Board of Elections of Hamilton County, 132 Ohio St., 5, 6 , 4 N. … Under Section 1, Article V of the Ohio Constitution,, every qualified elector is entitled to vote at all elections. *493 It was held in the second paragraph of the syllabus in the case of Monroe v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Hemphill v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

    61 Ohio St. 3d 385 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1991

    Lipschutz, v. Shoemaker (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 88 , 551 N.E.2d 160 , we rejected an inmate’s claim that the Parole Board could not consider crimes which did not result in conviction. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.