Case law

Commissioners v. Board of Public Works

39 Ohio St. (N.S.) 628 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

Perrysburg v. Fosdick, 14 O. S. 472; Knox Co. v. McComb, 19 O. S. 320, 346; Shunk v. First National Bank, 22 O. S. 508, 515; Olds v. Franklin Co. 20 O. S. 421; Allen v. Russell, 39 O. S. 336. … Wilson v. Blackbird, Creek Marsh Co. 2 Pet. 245; Gilman v. Philadelphia, 3 Wall. 713 ; Welton v. State of Mo. 91 U. S. 275 ; Pound v. Turck, 95 U. S. 459 ; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 689 .

Estate of Ridley v. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation

102 Ohio St. 3d 230 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2004

Mitchell v. … Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hosp. & Health Ctr. (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 86, 92 , 529 N.E.2d 449 , citing Bennison v.

State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin County Board of Elections

62 Ohio St. 3d 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1991

Hinkle, v. Franklin Cty. … This matter is remanded to the board of elections to determine the issue of fraud, consistent with this opinion. Writ allowed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary Election

88 Ohio St. 3d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 2000

School Emp. v. Girard Civ. … Sinay v.

In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary Election

87 Ohio St. 3d 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1999

McMillan v. Ashtabula Cty. … Keller *121 v. Cox (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 279, 281 , 707 N.E.2d 931, 933-934 . Brown-Clark’s comparable reliance on cases that were decided after a full hearing on the contest is similarly misplaced.

State Ex Rel. Burgstaller v. Franklin County Board of Elections

149 Ohio St. 193 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1948

State, ex rel., v. Eidgenoss, supra [ 108 Ohio St., 493 , 141 N. E., 277 ]; State, ex rel. Maxwell, Pros. Atty., v. Schneider, 103 Ohio St., 492 , 134 N. E., 443 . … Co., v. Ayres, Aud., 142 Ohio St., 216 , 51 N. E. (2d), 636; Koehler v. Board of Elections, 125 Ohio St., 251 , 181 N. E., 107 .

State ex rel. Todd v. Brown Cty. Court of Common Pleas

98 Ohio St. 3d 1486 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2003

State ex rel. Lawrence County Republican Party Executive Committee v. Brunner

119 Ohio St. 3d 92 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2008

Republican Party Executive Commt. v. … Brown at 161, 68 O.O.2d 100 , 314 N.E.2d 376 ; State ex rel. Devitt v.

State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections

40 Ohio St. 3d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1988

Pajestka, v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Jemo Associates, Inc. v. Lindley

64 Ohio St. 2d 365 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1980

Code 5717-1-08(C) is indeed presumptively binding on us as respects board procedure, see, e.g., State, ex rel. Kildow, v. Indus. Comm. (1934), 128 Ohio St. 573, 580 ; Zangerle v. … Kildow, v. Indus. Comm., supra; Zangerle v. Evatt, supra. See, also, fn. 1, supra. The commissioner contends that the corporate signature requirement of Ohio Adm.

State ex rel. Purola v. Cable

48 Ohio St. 2d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1976

Breckinridge was a duly.éleeted de jure member of the board. .. : ■ i . •. Under settled Ohio case law, Roman was at least a de facto member of the board of trustees. State, ex rel. Witten, v. … Brown, J.J., concur. ,. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Lindley

64 Ohio St. 2d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1980

(Bd. of Revision v. Fodor, 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 , approved and followed.)” *33 The board did provide cogent reasons for rejecting the valuations offered by Westinghouse. 1 In Wheeling Steel Corp. v. … Hence, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. W. Brown and Dowd, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Elsass v. Shelby County Board of Commissioners

92 Ohio St. 3d 529 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2001

See Goodin v. … See Turner v.

Clermont County Bar Ass'n v. Meeker

14 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1984

This court concurs in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (5) and (6), DR 6-101(A)(3), DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3), and Gov. Bar R. I and V(4). The record amply supports the board’s conclusions. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Northlake Hills Cooperative, Inc. v. Collins

45 Ohio St. 2d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1976

Such conclusion of the board is supported by the record, by the absence of any reconsideration provision in E. C. 5717.02, and by Hileman v. … For reason of the foregoing, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W, Brown and P- Brown, JJ., concur.

Johnson v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

48 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1990

In this cause, as noted by Justice Brown in his concurring and dissenting opinion in Johnson I, the board ordered that one hundred seventy-six- claimants’ appeals be consolidated as a mass *70 appeal. … As this court noted in Rocky River v. State Emp.

Carney v. Board of Tax Appeals

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 445 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1959

In support of his position, he cites the three following cases decided by this court, all in accord with the foregoing comments: Weber v. Board of Health, 148 Ohio St., 389 , 74 N. E. (2d), 331; Belden v. … The court again considered this general problem in the more recent case of Rollman & Sons Co. v. Board of Revision of Hamilton County, 163 Ohio St., 363 , 127 N.

Board of County Commissioners v. Thormyer

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1959

Stebbing v. Metropolitan Board of Works (1870), 6 Q. B., 37. 3. … In re Application of Board of Transportation, 140 Misc., 557 , 251 N. Y. Supp., 409 . See Babin v. City of Ashland, 160 Ohio St., 328 , 346 et seq., 116 N. E. (2d), 580.

Leatherman v. County Board of Education

96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1917

Judgment affirmed on authority of Cline v. Martin et al., 94 Ohio St., 420 . Judgment affirmed. Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Corn v. Board of Liquor Control

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1953

City of Middletown v. City Commission of Middletown, 138 Ohio St., 596 , 37 N. E. (2d), 609; Lindblom v. Board of Tax Appeals, 151 Ohio St., 250 , 85 N. E. (2d), 376. … Di Cillo & Sons, Inc., v. Chester Zoning Board of Appeals, 158 Ohio St., 302 , 109 N. E. (2d), 8.