Case law

Aeronca Manufacturing Corp. v. Board of Tax Appeals

6 Ohio St. 2d 87 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1966

Unquestionably a taxpayer does not intend (Section 5701.07, Revised Code, and Glidden Co. v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with instructions to amend the assessment certificates in accordance with this opinion.

City of Cincinnati v. Budget Commission

35 Ohio St. 3d 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1988

Budget Comm. of Brown Cty. v. Georgetown (1986), 24 Ohio St. 3d 33 , 24 OBR 76, 492 N.E. 2d 826 ; Cincinnati v. Budget Comm. (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 43 , 13 O.O. 3d 32, 391 N.E. 2d 734 ; Painesville v. Lake Cty. … Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H, Brown, JJ., concur.

Butler v. Brown's heirs

5 Ohio St. 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1855

We are satisfied that Brown did not pay the purchase money. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the rule stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Manley v. … Brown’s heirs must do equity by bringing into court the purchase money, before they can demand the interposition of this court to quiet their title. It may become necessary to make Bissell a party to the suit.

State ex rel. Duncan v. Portage County Board of Elections

115 Ohio St. 3d 405 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2007

Rust v. Lucas Cty. … Stine v. Brown Cty. Bd. of Elections, 101 Ohio St.3d 252 , 2004-Ohio-771 , 804 N.E.2d 415, ¶ 15 .

State ex rel. Allen v. Warren County Board of Elections

115 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2007

Valore v. Summit Cty. … In her advisory opinion, the secretary advised all *188 county boards of elections that — based on Morrison v.

National Lime & Stone Co. v. Kosydar

38 Ohio St. 2d 206 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1974

It was concluded by the board that the items involved in this appeal were used directly in processing the raw stone, under the authority of France Co. v. Evatt, supra. … The order of the board was therefore reasonable and lawful, and is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, SterN, Celebrezze and P. BrowN, JJ., concur. W. BrowN, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Parrott v. Brunner

117 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 29, 2008

Wright v. … Ruehlmann v. Luken (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 1 , 598 N.E.2d 1149 (mandamus); State ex rel. Ferguson v. Brown (1962), 173 Ohio St. 317 , 19 O.O.2d 227 , 181 N.E.2d 890 (mandamus); State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty.

Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning Appeals

144 Ohio St. 3d 188 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2015

White Oak Property Dev., L.L.C. v. Washington Twp., 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2011-05-011, 2012-Ohio-425 , 2012 WL 368254 . … BGC Properties v. Bath Twp., 9th Dist. Summit No. 14252, 1990 WL 31789 , *4 (Mar. 21, 1990); Cent. Motors Corp. v. Pepper Pike, 63 Ohio App.2d 34, 65 , 409 N.E.2d 258 (8th Dist.1979); White Oak, 12th Dist. Brown No.

Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

84 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1998

According to Stanjim Co. v. Mahoning Cty. … Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 388 , 643 N.E.2d 1143 ; Mellon Bank v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of *36 Revision (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 651 , 660 N.E.2d 1188 ; Columbia Toledo Corp. v. Lucas Cty.

Sun Oil Co. v. Lindley

56 Ohio St. 2d 313 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1978

E. 2d 14 ; Troy v. Board (1954), 160 Ohio St. 451 , 116 N. E. 2d 725 ; Division v. Board (1948), 149 Ohio St. 33 , 77 N. E. 2d 242 ; and Cincinnati College v. State (1850), 19 Ohio 110 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Leach, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. P. Brown and Locher, JJ., dissent.

MB West Chester, L.L.C. v. Butler County Board of Revision

126 Ohio St. 3d 430 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2010

Tube Co. v. … XLII v. Delaware Cty.

State Ex Rel. Kilby v. Summit County Board of Elections

133 Ohio St. 3d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2012

Minus v. Brown, 30 Ohio St.2d 75, 81, 283 N.E.2d 131 (1972). … Williams, v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 13, 19 [368 N.E.2d 838]; State, ex rel. Commrs. of the Sinking Fund, v. Brown (1957), 167 Ohio St. 71 [146 N.E.2d 287].” Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga Cty.

General Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

53 Ohio St. 3d 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1990

In Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty. … Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Mantho v. Board of Liquor Control

162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1954

The decision in Drake et al., Trustees, v. Tucker, supra, has been approved and followed in many cases, including Cadwell v. Cadwell, 93 Ohio St., 23 , 112 N. E., 148 ; State, ex rel. Reamer, v. … E., 1009 ; Hedland v. Lones, Judge, 128 Ohio St., 68 , 190 N. E., 214 ; Sheets, Exr., v. Hodes, Admr., 142 Ohio St., 559, 564 , 53 N. E. (2d), 804; and Hagerman, Dir., v. City of Dayton, 147 Ohio St., 313, 325 , 71 N.

Libby-Owens-Ford Co. v. Collins

50 Ohio St. 2d 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1977

Midwest Haulers v. Glander (1948), 150 Ohio St. 402, 407 . The Board of Tax Appeals made a factual determination and applied to it the correct principles of law. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Executone of Northwest Ohio, Inc. v. Commissioners

12 Ohio St. 3d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1984

Scandrick, v. McGee (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 356, 358 [ 21 O.O.3d 225 ]; Boger Contracting Corp. v. Board (1978), 60 Ohio App. 2d 195, 199 [ 14 O.O.3d 176 ]; State, ex rel. Walton, v. Hermann (1900), 63 Ohio St. 440 . … Britton, v. Scott (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 268 . For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.

State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of Commissioners

65 Ohio St. 3d 545 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1992

Alford v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. Bacon

61 Ohio St. 2d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1980

In deciding these appeals the board can make any order and use all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal is taken. In Westchester Estates v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

National Cash Register Co. v. Kosydar

35 Ohio St. 2d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1973

Spalding & Bros. v. Edwards (1923), 262 U. S. 66 ; Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1946), 329 U. S. 69 ; Joy Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission (1949), 337 U. S. 286 ; Empresa Siderurgica v. … As to such latter assessment, the decision of the board is affirmed. Decision reversed in part and affirmed in part. Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze and W. Brown; JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., and P.

State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of Health

77 Ohio St. 3d 247 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1997

Neff v. Corrigan (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 12, 14 , 661 N.E.2d 170, 173 . Crabtree contends that she is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the board to enact the tabled tattoo regulation. … Gillivan v.