Case law

State ex rel. Brittain v. Board of Agriculture

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1917

On that date the secretary of the board of agriculture furnished relator with an excerpt from the minutes of the board, of which the following is a copy: “Moved by Mr. Williamson, seconded by Mr. … In the case of Hornberger, Director of Public Safety, v. State, ex rel. Fischer, ante, 148, certain provisions of the civil service law passed April 28, 1913 (103 O. L., 698), were before the court for consideration.

State ex rel. Fowler v. Board of Elections

126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 582 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1933

This section provides, in part, as follows: “Any candidate voted for at a primary or other election, * * * by making an application in writing to the board of elections, shall be entitled to have the votes for any such candidate … pay the actual cost of such recount, such bond to be to the approval of the board and in no case less than five dollars per precinct, and not to exceed ten dollars per precinct.

State ex rel. Carson v. Board of Education

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 322 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1926

State ex rel. Gillespi v. Board County Commissioners

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1924

(State, ex rel Ross, v. Board of Education, 42 Ohio St., 374 , followed.) Judgment affirmed. Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

State Ex Rel. Board of Edn. v. Sutton

152 Ohio St. 453 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1949

of education, such board may declare an emergency. … And what is the import of the language “as determined by the local board of education” in the provision “where existing limitations make adequate * * * improvements impossible as determined by the local board of education

Board of Park Commrs. v. City of Cleveland

146 Ohio St. 696 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1946

State ex rel. Gerke v. Board of Commissioners

26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 364 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Shepard v. The Comm'rs, etc., 8 Ohio St. 354 . … fully of the nature of the claim; but that the board refused to allow it or order it to be paid.

Cummins Property Services, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

117 Ohio St. 3d 516 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2008

. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) properly applied the precepts of our decision in Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Watson

2022 Ohio 2212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2022

In addition, Watson has stipulated that he failed to promptly satisfy a similar lien relating to medical services provided to another client, Reginald Brown. {¶ 6} The board found that Watson violated Prof.Cond.R. … V(21), and (3) commit no further misconduct. {¶ 18} In support of that recommendation, the board relied primarily on this court’s decision in Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Board of Tax Appeals v. Smith

45 Ohio St. 2d 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1976

Relator is asking this court to order respondent to comply with the board ’s' order. In State, ex rel. Board of Tax Appeals, v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Malynn

131 Ohio St. 3d 377 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2012

Bar Assn. v. Malynn, 131 Ohio St.3d 377, 2012-Ohio-1293.] MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. MALYNN. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Neither party has objected to the board’s recommendation. {¶ 18} In support of its recommended sanction, the board cites Akron Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Beck v. Casey

51 Ohio St. 3d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1990

Ashbrook, v. Brown (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 115 , 529 N.E. 2d 896 . … Ferguson, v. Brown (1962), 173 Ohio St. 317 , 19 O.O. 2d 227, 181 N.E. 2d 890 , overruled in part, State, ex rel. Saffold, v. Bd. of Elections, supra.

CASA 94, L.P. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

89 Ohio St. 3d 622 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2000

A complainant who fails to provide such information or evidence is precluded from introducing it on appeal to the board of tax appeals or the court of common pleas, except that the board of tax appeals or court may admit … In Coventry Towers, Inc. v. Strongsville (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 120 , 18 OBR 151, 480 N.E.2d 412 , the city revised a report it had presented to the board of revision before the city presented it to the BTA.

State ex rel. Fant v. Board of Trustees

68 Ohio St. 3d 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1994

Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. Yakubek

142 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 29, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

Tanson Holdings, Inc. v. Darke County Board of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 687 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1996

In Walters v. Knox Cty. … The BTA further stated, “[T]his Board does not find that a transfer between appellant and the son of the prior owner exhibits the indices of a market sale.” This court is not a “ ‘super’ board of tax appeals.”

State ex rel. Patrick v. Board of Elections

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1962

Keller, v. Loney et ad., Board of Flections, 169 Ohio St., 394 . Appeal dismissed. Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bryant and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Grieeith, J., not participating.

Brokensword Stone Co. v. Board of Township Trustees

78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1908

Board of Education v. State ex rel. Wickham

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 133 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1909

card entitled him to enter only the sixth grade; also that at least the father knew that the rules gave authority for promotion to pass over the sixth grade to the Board and to the Board only. … The superintendent is to act under the advice and direction of the Board; have complete supervision of the school, and see that all the rules and regulations of the Board are enforced.

State ex rel. Boerger v. Board of Education

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1954

Respondent contends that it is not mandatory that the territory be transferred merely because a petition bearing the signatures of more than 75 per cent of the electors was filed with the county board; that the county board … If the decision * * * is an approval of the proposed transfer * * * the county board of education shall * * * adopt a resolution transferring the territory.” (Emphasis added.)