Case law

State ex rel. Pike Cty. Republican Executive Committee v. Brown

38 Ohio St. 3d 713 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1988

Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Wright, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Stamps v. Automatic Data Processing Board

42 Ohio St. 3d 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1989

Kay, v. Brown (1970), 24 Ohio St. 2d 105 , 53 O.O. 2d 284, 264 N.E. 2d 908 . If it does, the action must be dismissed because this court has no original jurisdiction in injunction. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Kihm v. Lindley

70 Ohio St. 2d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1982

Similarly, there is no evidence that appellees, at any time, actually filed such returns or made such payments. *78 In Weiss v. … For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. W. Brown, Acting C. J., Reilly, Moyer, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morton

5 Ohio St. 3d 206 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1983

Bar Assn. v. Green (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 48 ; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Pfefferle (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 4 [ 19 O.O.3d 121 ]; Bar Assn. v. Canales (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 207 [ 16 O.O.3d 243 ]; Akron Bar Assn. v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Commissioners of the Sinking Fund v. Brown

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 71 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1957

This court recently held in the case of Leach v. … Board of County Commrs., v. Guckenberger, Aud., 165 Ohio St., 12 , 133 N. E (2d), 323. The Guckenberger case was not an election contest but was an action in mandamus.

Board of Education of Dublin School District v. Limbach

69 Ohio St. 3d 255 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1994

Soc. for Metals v. … Bowling Congress, Inc. v.

Appeal of Smith v. Chester Township Board of Trustees

60 Ohio St. 2d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1979

In Stephan v. State Veterinary Medical Board (1960), 113 Ohio App. 538 , the Court of Appeals construed the analogous filing requirements of R. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ.,. concur. Celebrezze, C. J., Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Peake v. Board of Education of the South Point Local School District

44 Ohio St. 2d 119 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1975

TMs rule was affirmed, while distinguished, in the recent case of Castellano v. Kosydar (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 107 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert and Stern, JJ., concur in the syllabus and judgment.

Ridgeview Center, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of Revision

42 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1989

Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 13 , 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N. E. 2d 443 , paragraphs two, three and four of the syllabus. This court is not a ‘ “super” Board of Tax Appeals.’ … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Summit United Methodist Church v. Kinney

2 Ohio St. 3d 72 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1982

“In reviewing decisions of the board, this court has repeatedly stated that it is not a trier of fact de novo, but that it is confined to its statutorily delineated duties (R.C. 5717.04) of determining whether the board’s … Brown, Parrino, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Parrino, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Dublin-Sawmill Properties v. Franklin County Board of Revision

67 Ohio St. 3d 575 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1993

Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. … Howard v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 195, 197 , 524 N.E.2d 887, 889 . *577 Accordingly, the decision of the BTA is reversed.

In re Reinstatement of Miller

35 Ohio St. 2d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1973

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule V(20) of the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, a hearing was conducted by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Stromberg v. Bd. of Edn. of Bratenahl

64 Ohio St. 2d 98 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1980

Appellant essentially argues that as a taxpayer he has a private right, independent of the Bratenahl board of educa *101 tion, to relitigate the same public issue determined against the board. … Brown, McBride, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur. McBride, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.

Fawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

75 Ohio St. 3d 601 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1996

In Freshwater v. Belmont Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 140 , 568 N.E.2d 1215 , we held that a reserve for replacements was a proper item to consider in valuing real property. … Youngs *603 town Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Revision (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 398 , 20 O.O.3d 349 , 422 N.E.2d 846 , paragraph two of the syllabus.

Aldridge v. Huntington Local School District Board of Education

38 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1988

Brown, J. … It is certified to us as conflicting with a decision by a court of the *157 First Appellate District (Charles v. Bd. of Edn., supra) and a decision by a court of the Seventh Appellate District (Kinser v.

State ex rel. Shine v. Garofalo

69 Ohio St. 2d 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1982

Brown, J. Appellant seeks, by way of an extraordinary writ, judicial review of the alleged termination of her employment by appellee. … C. 124.34 for terminated classified civil service employees, her ordinary remedy by way of appeal to the board of review has been precluded. The authority for this proposition is found in State, ex rel. Alford, v.

State Ex Rel. Hall v. State Employment Relations Board

122 Ohio St. 3d 528 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2009

Hall v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 122 Ohio St.3d 528, 2009-Ohio-3603.] THE STATE EX REL. HALL, APPELLEE, v. STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLANT. … Relations Bd. v.

Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. One Euclid Co.

16 Ohio St. 2d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1968

Park Investment Co., v. … In spite of the language quoted from the entry of the board, the record in this case reveals that the board did, in fact, show a real regard for the evidence introduced by the appellants in arriving at its valuation and did

Citizens Financial Corp. v. Kosydar

43 Ohio St. 2d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1975

The board cites Koch v. Kosydar (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 74 , as to the criteria to be used in determining whether a personal service transaction exists. … Brown, JJ., dissent.

McDonald's Corp. v. Union County Board of Revision

137 Ohio St. 3d 541 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2013

UNION COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; CONNOLLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as McDonald’s Corp. v. Union Cty. … Bd. of Edn. v. Union Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2011-K-4087 through 2011-K-4096 (Sept.  SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 25, 2012); case No. 2013-0682, Memorial Ltd.