Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • Patchell v. Board of Commissioners

    81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 491 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seity v. State Medical Board

    5 Ohio Law. Abs. 140 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1927

    Seity contends that the State Medical Board has no right to dismiss appeal and hear case on issues, they being arrest and conviction for felony and immorality demanding revocation of license, the charge of being guilty of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leiner v. Board of Commissioners

    83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1910

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fuller v. Board of Commissioners

    83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Partington

    84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 481 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pavey v. Board of Commissioners

    84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowers v. Board of Education

    78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carder v. Board of Commissioners

    16 Ohio St. (N.S.) 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1865

    The board of county commissioners is the body—the quasi corporation—in whom is vested by law the title of all the property of the county. … In Trustees of Green Tp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leighton v. Board of Trustees

    174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 309 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1963

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farrand v. State Medical Board

    152 Ohio St. 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1949

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Board of Education

    13 Ohio St. 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1862

    This question, and this case, we think, is, in effect, decided by the case of Rider v. Lynch, 8 Ohio St. Rep. 347 . … Any other construction of the provisions of the school act would introduce conflict between the township boards and the local directors of the sub-districts, and contravene the evident policy of the act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 789 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926

    Section 3812, General Code, confers upon a municipality general authority to levy assessments for streett improvements again'st property within such corporation belonging to a board of education and being used for school … In the event of failure of shell board of education to pay an assessment so levied, an action may be brought by the municipal corporation against such board-of education to recover the amount of such assessment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilkins v. Board of Education

    80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 717 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Woolum

    156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 281 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Education

    38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 3 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    In answer to this contention it is sufficient to say that the objections are not well taken, and that the case is not distim guishable in principle from Board of Education v. McLandsborough, 36 Ohio St. 227 . … Corry v. Hoffman, 35 Ohio St. 435 ; Nelson v. Milford, 7 Pick. 18 ; State v. Hammonton, 38 N. J. L. 430.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Mills

    38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    to bind the township board. … Baldwin v. Bank of Massillon, 1 Ohio St. 141 ; Sherer v. Piper, 26 Ohio St. 476 ; Lowe v. Lehman, 15 Ohio St. 179 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Winkleman v. Board of Trustees

    68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 645 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1903

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long v. Board of Commissioners

    75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 539 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Azbell

    81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 503 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cupp v. Board of Commissioners

    19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1869

    The act to establish boards of county commissioners (S. & C. 543, sec. 9) makes a “majority” of the board of county commissioners “ a quorum,” and authorizes them (sec. 1) to do and perform “ all such duties as now are, or … To require in such cases personal notice to the owners, would, in our judgment, be quite as unreasonable, as to require that owners of lands should, as was said in the case of Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.