Case law

Malcolm v. BD. OF EDUC. OF HONEOYE FALL-LIMA

757 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 9, 2010

United States v. LaMorte, 940 F.Supp. 572, 576 (S.D.N.Y.1996). … See also Zavalidroga v. Cote, 395 Fed.Appx. 737, 739 , 2010 WL 3894789 at *1, 2010 U.S.App.

Arthur v. Nyquist

514 F. Supp. 1133 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 19, 1981

Pennick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406 , 97 S.Ct. 2766 , 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977); Reed v. … Green v. County School Board, supra at 440-41, 88 S.Ct. at 1695-96 (emphasis added).

United States v. Salmasian

515 F. Supp. 685 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 8, 1981

United States v. Liberti, 616 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1980). … See United States v. Ochs, supra, at 1257 n.8.

Costa v. Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc.

212 F. Supp. 3d 412 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 22, 2016

See Kassim v. … Kalamas at $100, Brown v. Mustang Sally’s Spirits & Grill, Inc., No. 12-CV-529S, 2013 WL 5295655 , at *4 (W.D.N.Y.

Strohmeyer v. International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades

989 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 17, 1997

Board of *460 Trustees, No. 93-CV-6467L, slip op. at 10 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 1996), aff'd 116 F.3d 465 (2d Cir.1997); Suttell v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 793 F.Supp. 70, 74 (S.D.N.Y.1992). … Brown v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 936 F.Supp. 665 , 674 n. 6 (E.D.Mo.1996), aff 'd, 113 F.3d 139 (8th Cir.1997).

MASTERFOODS USA v. Arcor USA, Inc.

230 F. Supp. 2d 302 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 4, 2002

Arcor argues that the background colors of the packaging (brown and yellow) are functional in that they convey whether the candy inside is chocolate (brown) or peanut based (yellow). … Hershey Foods Corp. v. Mars, Inc., 998 F.Supp. 500, 506 (M.D.Pa., 1998). 5 . Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elecs. Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir.1961).

Sloth v. Constellation Brands, Inc.

924 F. Supp. 2d 461 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 19, 2013

Ragusa v. … King v.

Pittsburgh & Erie Coal Co. v. George Urban Milling Co.

226 F. 332 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 24, 1915

From these facts I think there *334 was a common peril to- the ship and cargo, as that term is interpreted-in Willcox, Peck & Hughes v. American Smelting Co. (D. … As said by Judge Brown in The State of Alabama (D. C.) 17 Red. 854: •‘¡Navigation must necessarily be according to observation at the time.

Lilly v. Lewiston-Porter Central School District

853 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 20, 2011

See Zahrey v. … See Duane v.

Altaire Builders, Inc. v. Village of Horseheads

551 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 7, 1982

See, Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975) (local school board members), and Scheuer v. … The duties of that zoning board were deemed more closely analogous to those of the local school board official in Wood v.

In re LaCharity

53 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 7, 1943

Filomio v. Powell, D.C., 38 F.Supp. 183 . Petitioner’s attempts to appeal were, therefore, not timely, his appeal rights were waived, and his request that his appeal be transferred to the Buffalo Appeal Board was moot. … Bergdoll v. Drum, 2 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 897 , 129 A.L.R. 1165 ; Ex parte McDonald, D.C., 253 F. 99 .

Lauchert v. American S. S. Co.

65 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 7, 1946

Seward v. Nissen, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 545 ; Board of Public Instruction for Hernando County, etc., v. Meredith, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 712, 713 ; Fletcher v. … In Douglas v.

The Sultana

77 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 8, 1948

the steamer Sultana, her engines, etc., and that all persons having or claiming to have any interest therein be cited to appear and answer and that process, with clause of foreign attachment, may issue against respondent Browning … See also Tague v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., D.C..E.D.N.Y., 5 F.R.D. 337 ; Orange County Theatres, Inc. v. Levy, D.C.,S.D.N. Y., 26 F.Supp. 416, 418 ; June v. George C. Peterson Co., 7 Cir., 155 F.2d 963 ;’ Dickheiser v.

United States v. Lowman

117 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 15, 1954

Dickinson v. United States, 74 S.Ct. 153 ; Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 ; Goff v. United States, 4 Cir., 135 F.2d 610 ; Schuman v. United States, 9 Cir., 208 F.2d 801 . … Without some proof to the contrary, the local board had no evidence before it to support the classification of defendant as 1-A. Annett v. United States, 10 Cir., 205 F.2d 689 ; United States v.

United States v. Daneals

370 F. Supp. 1289 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 29, 1974

James Richard Lenthe, CR. 72-330 (Board postponed induction; more than 120 days passed before Board acted again; defendant was entitled to new notice of classification because of passage of 120 days). United States v. … United States v. James Stanley Karapanter, CR. 72-414 (Defendant appeared for induction, was refused). United States v. Steven Ames Peterson, CR. 72-429 (Draft Board and Appeal Board gave no reason for denying C.

Pyzynski v. New York Cent. R.

7 F.R.D. 302 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 30, 1946

v. … In this respect the instant case differs from the Brown case and from Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc., 257 N.Y. 305 , 178 N.E. 289 , 78 A.L.R. 578 , on which the Brown case rests.

Picotte v. Community Child Care Center of the Third Ward, Inc.

901 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 12, 1995

Meiri v. … Harris v.

Rychlik v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

130 F. Supp. 580 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 29, 1955

Farris v. Alaska Airlines, D.C., 113 F.Supp. 907 ; Moore v. Illinois Central R. Co., 312 U.S. 630 , 61 S.Ct. 754 , 85 L.Ed. 1089 .” … See Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, supra. The plaintiff has not brought himself within any of said reasons.

Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Town of Amherst, NY

251 F. Supp. 2d 1187 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 4, 2003

As a local zoning board, the ZBA acted under the color of state law. See West v. … Plainville Zoning Board of Appeals, 297 F.3d 14, 21-22 (1st Cir.2002) (in the majority of cases the proper remedy for a zoning board decision that violates the TCA will be an order instructing the board to authorize construction

Brown

District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 19, 2026

Baez v. Hennessy, 853 F.2d 73, 77 (2d Cir. 1988). To the extent that Brown names Wydysh in his official capacity, Dkt. 1, at 2, it “is, in effect, a suit against the state itself[.]” Berman Enters., Inc. v. … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833 (1994). There is no allegation that Brown was assaulted by a prisoner.