Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,467 results
2.20s
McGuire v. Town of Cheektowaga
District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 29, 2024
Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 49 (2d Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)). … Brown, 929 F.3d at 49 (footnote and emphasis omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownKennedy v. Trimble Nursery-Land Furniture, Inc.
22 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 22, 1938
Co. v. Bade-Cummins Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 63 F.2d 928 . … The claims were again rejected and appeal taken to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals held claims 4, 5, and 6 patentable.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCutre, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 27, 2024
Brown, Psy.D., and A. Chapman, Psy.D. (Id. at 22). On February 12, 2021, Dr. Brown opined that Plaintiff’s learning disorder was a severe impairment. (Id. at 65). … Brown as to Plaintiff’s limitations therefrom. (Id. at 80-81). The ALJ found the opinions of Dr. Brown and Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRandall v. City of Niagara Falls
702 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 21, 1988
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Kaolin v. Long Island R. Co., 504 F.Supp. 656 (E.D.N.Y.1980). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . In New York a person has no right to an appointment even if his name appears among the three highest on an eligible list.
Cited 0 timesPublished965 F. Supp. 2d 302 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 4, 2013
Benette v. Cinemark U.S.A, Inc., 295 F.Supp.2d 243, 251 (W.D.N.Y.2003). See also Clark County School District v. … Breeden, 532 U.S. 268, 270 , 121 S.Ct. 1508 , 149 L.Ed.2d 509 (2001) (conduct must be severely threatening or humiliating to rise to the level of hostile work environment); Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublished598 F. Supp. 2d 367 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 6, 2009
Barton v. Summers, 293 F.3d 944, 949 (6th Cir.2002) (citing Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 289 , 97 S.Ct. 2749 , 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977)); see also Phillips v. … Board of Educ., Central Islip Union Free School Dist., 196 F.Supp.2d 259, 267 (E.D.N.Y.2002) (“Ancillary damages permissible under the Eleventh Amendment include the imposition of fines and awards of attorneys’ fees”) (citing
Cited 10 timesPublished209 F. Supp. 3d 557 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 21, 2016
Indeed, as defense counsel pointed out, the only live testimony presented by the Government consisted of the testimony of Agent Brown during the detention hearing held before the magistrate judge in Florida, and Agent Brown … United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublished826 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 15, 1993
Fane v. Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 128 (2nd Cir.1991), citing, Voss v. Black & Decker Mfg. Co., 59 N.Y.2d 102 , 463 N.Y.S.2d 398 , 450 N.E.2d 204 (1983). … Darsan v. Guncalito Corp., 153 A.D.2d 868 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 594 (1989).
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Electrical Benefit Fund v. Heary Brothers Lightning Protection Co.
931 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 28, 1995
As a general labor law principle, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) is the exclusive forum to remedy conduct that is arguably protected or prohibited by the NLRA. San Diego Building Trades Council v. … See, e.g., Haggiag v. Brown, 728 F.Supp. 286, 296-96 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
Cited 10 timesPublishedNeeld v. American Hockey League
439 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 25, 1977
Horn v. Lockhart, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 570 , 21 L.Ed. 657 (1873); Kerr v. Compagnie De Ultramar, 250 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1958); Karakatsanis v. Conquestador Cia. … Cf., Defini and Wohl v. Home Lines Agency, Inc., Nos. CPD-38522-75 and CPD-37985-75 (N.Y. State Division of Human Rights, April 27, 1976), aff’d, Appeal No. 3491 (Appeal Board, May 12, 1977).
Cited 11 timesPublished269 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 8, 2003
See Morales v. … Defendant cites Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished260 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 29, 2003
In Patrowich v. … Eventually, the association’s eleven-member board of directors voted unanimously to relieve the plaintiff of his duties and appoint a new general manager.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. New York · Jun 16, 2026
As an example, Lewis Tree alleges that on August 20, 2025, its Chief Operating Officer Dennis Brown, Jr. … Lewis Tree claims that during this encounter, Cervantes told Brown that he planned to meet with Oncor on behalf of United Clearing. (Id.).
Cited 0 timesUnknownStoot v. Capital Management Services, L.P.
District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 9, 2025
(/d. at J] 5-6) Brown states that she was not paid for this time. … See Puglisi v. TD Bank, N.A., 998 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown31 F. Supp. 3d 534 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 18, 2014
Whiting v. Lacara, 187 F.3d 317, 320 (2d Cir.1999). … (quoting Brown v. Nat’l Survival Games, Inc., No. 91-CV-221, 1994 WL 660533 , at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 1994)) (alteration in original).
Cited 2 timesPublishedSteenland v. Central Intelligence Agency
555 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 28, 1983
Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, 553 F.2d 1360 (D.C.Cir.1977). … Compare, Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740 (D.C.Cir.1979) (affirming denial of fees in light of “enormous” commercial interest of plaintiff in disclosure of government manual), and Kaye v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCitizens Against Casino Gambling v. Stevens
945 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 10, 2013
Freytag v. … See Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994) (“Ambiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context”).
Cited 2 timesPublishedIthna'Asheri v. New York State Division of Parole
364 F. Supp. 2d 323 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 8, 2005
The Supreme Court further held in Edwards v. … It is not clear whether Graber's recommendation has been adopted by the New York State Parole Board. (Complaint, ¶ 6(B)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEncyclopaedia Britannica Educational Corp. v. Crooks
542 F. Supp. 1156 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 21, 1982
. *1159 Defendants are the Board of Educational Services, First Supervisory District, Erie County, New York [BOCES], and its individual officers and directors. … As an instructional television station, it is considered a regional education agency and is chartered by the New York State Board of Regents.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. New York · Jun 9, 2020
Buffalo Carpenters Pension Fund v. … Tumbling v. Merced Irr. Dist., 262 F.R.D. 509, 525 (E.D. Cal. 2009) (document production restricted to the Board members accused in the complaint).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna