Case law

Folger v. Conway

443 F. Supp. 2d 438 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 17, 2006

Brown, 355 F.3d at 91 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); accord, e.g., Howard v. Walker, 406 F.3d 114, 124 (2d Cir.2005); Benn v. Greiner, 402 F.3d 100, 105 (2d Cir.2005); Cotto v. … Brown v. Keane, 355 F.3d 82, 92 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Raheem v. Kelly, 257 F.3d 122, 142 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1118 , 122 S.Ct. 930 ,151 L.Ed2d 892 (2002); Wray v.

Millard v. Humphrey

8 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 26, 1934

In Ithaca Trust Co. v. … In Pennsylvania Co., etc., v. Brown (D. C.) 6 F.

Rochester City Sch. Dist. v. Aramark Educ. Servs., LLC

292 F. Supp. 3d 595 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 13, 2017

Wells Fargo Century, Inc. v. Brown , 475 F.Supp.2d 368 , 371 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). … See also Snapper, Inc. v.

Malcolm v. Rochester City Sch. Dist.

388 F. Supp. 3d 257 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 11, 2019

See Guerra v. Jones , 421 F. App'x 15 , 17 (2d Cir. 2011) ; Sassaman v. Gamache , 566 F.3d 307 , 315 (2d Cir. 2009). … Brown v. City of Syracuse , 197 F. App'x 22 , 25 (2d Cir. 2006).

Tribe v. Borough of Sayre

562 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 10, 1983

Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1976) (emphasis added). Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on grounds of sovereign immunity is denied. … Allshouse v. City of Pittsburgh, 37 D. & C.2d 27, 31 (1965).

Hughes v. Xerox Corp.

37 F. Supp. 3d 629 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 13, 2014

Brown v. … Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 710 (2d Cir.1998).

Kwik-Set, Inc. v. Welch Grape Juice Co.

14 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 20, 1936

Lehnbeuter v. Holthaus, 105 U.S. 94, 96 , 26 L.Ed. 939 ; Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co., supra; Johnson Bros. Engineering Corp. v. Caille Bros. Co. (D.C.) 8 F.Supp. 198 ; Hartford-Empire Co. v. … Co. v. P, A: Geier Co. (C.C.A.) 74 F.(2d) 992 ; Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., v. Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. (C.C.A.) 72 F.(2d) 47 ; Smith v.

Vann v. The City of Rochester

District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 28, 2024

Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011)). … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358.

United States v. Funderburk

492 F. Supp. 2d 223 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 22, 2007

See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 597-99 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 487-88 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). … Funderburk’s reliance on Brown, supra, is similarly misplaced. In Brown , unlike the instant case, the defendant was arrested “without probable cause and without a warrant.” Brown, supra, at 591 , 95 S.Ct. *269 2254.

Gennamore v. Buffalo Sheet Metals, Inc.

568 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 14, 1983

Haeberle v. Board of Trustees of Buffalo Carpenters, 624 F.2d 1132 , 1136 n. 6 (2d Cir.1980); Valle v. Joint Plumbing Industry Board, 623 F.2d 196, 203 (2d Cir.1980). … In Morales v.

McGuire v. Town of Cheektowaga

District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 29, 2024

Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 49 (2d Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)). … Brown, 929 F.3d at 49 (footnote and emphasis omitted).

Jones v. Artus

615 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 18, 2009

This form indicates that Jones signed for receipt of a “Brown Folder and Legal Paperwork” on September 22, 2006. See Petitioner’s Ex. C (Docket No. 16). … See McMahon v.

United States v. Williams

350 F. Supp. 3d 261 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 21, 2018

See Zurcher v. … In briefing on this issue before Judge McCarthy, Defendant relied heavily on United States v. Brown , 828 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2016). (Dkt. 21 at 26).

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Waligora

24 B.R. 905 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 12, 1982

United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc., 674 F.2d 144, 150 (2 Cir.1982). … & Packaging Corp. v.

Derechin v. State University of New York

731 F. Supp. 1160 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 7, 1989

See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344 , 96 S.Ct. 2074, 2077 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976). The sufficiency of the promissory claim of entitlement depends, obviously, upon state law. Ibid.; see Board of Regents v.

Raimondi v. Avaya, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 11, 2023

“Where the moving party demonstrates ‘the absence of a genuine issue of material fact,’” Brown v. … .”); Higgins v. NYP Holdings, Inc., 836 F. Supp. 2d 182, 194-95 (S.D.N.Y. 2011); Brown v. The Pension Boards, 488 F.

Frein v. Orange County California Sheriff Department

District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 15, 2023

The Court gave Frein an opportunity to show cause why that injunction should not be issued, id., and Frein responded to that order, Frein v. Brown, Case No. 23-cv-284, Docket Item 5 (W.D.N.Y. … See generally Brown, Case No. 23-cv-284, Docket Item 5; Obama, Case No. 23-cv-331, Docket Items 5 and 6; U.S.

Boyd v. Osborn, Esq.

District Court, W.D. New York · May 6, 2022

See Pettaway v. … See United States v.

Cutre, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 27, 2024

Brown, Psy.D., and A. Chapman, Psy.D. (Id. at 22). On February 12, 2021, Dr. Brown opined that Plaintiff’s learning disorder was a severe impairment. (Id. at 65). … Brown as to Plaintiff’s limitations therefrom. (Id. at 80-81). The ALJ found the opinions of Dr. Brown and Dr.

Randall v. City of Niagara Falls

702 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 21, 1988

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Kaolin v. Long Island R. Co., 504 F.Supp. 656 (E.D.N.Y.1980). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . In New York a person has no right to an appointment even if his name appears among the three highest on an eligible list.