Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.22s
Sacket's Harbor Bank v. President of Lewis County Bank
11 Barb. 213 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1851
It appears from the case, that the plaintiffs obtained the butter — the selling of which is held to constitute the illegality of their contract with the defendants — in settlement of a debt *215 due them by Gordon & Brown … the discount operations of the bank should be conducted at Ithaca, and not elsewhere, a single discount made within the city of New-York, was not considered within the prohibition ; and to the same principle see Suydam v.
Cited 5 timesPublished44 Misc. 2d 506 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1964
While we recognize that the right of suffrage is not an absolute right inherent in citizenship (Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. [88 U. … J., in Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. [22 U. S.] 738, 827 [1824]).
Cited 1 timesPublished35 N.Y.S. 81 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1895
BROWN, P. J. The exception taken to the denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint must be sustained. It appears that one Ce *82 burre entered into a contract with the defendant to erect a house. … The case does not fall within the doctrine of Lawrence v. Fox, 20 N. Y. 268 . The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
Cited 11 timesPublished21 Misc. 380 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1897
Story v. Brown, 4 Paige, 112 -115. . … Story v. Brown, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished83 Misc. 2d 42 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1975
(The reference to Iannucci is to Iannucci v Board of Supervisors of County of Washington, 20 NY2d 244 .) In November, 1974 the weighted voting plan was submitted to the electorate. … Therefore, he expressed a preference for one which had been proposed by the board and directed that it be submitted to the voters for their consideration on June 10, 1975 (Franklin v Krause, 81 Misc 2d 52 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished3 Johns. 17 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1808
In the case before us, the first mate gave the crew permission to go on shore, requiring only that the second mate should return and sleep on board. … B. in the case of Thompson v. Collins, (4 Bos. & Pul. 347.) who were inclined to think that each person ought to answer for his own default.
Cited 4 timesPublished182 Misc. 462 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1944
On the eve of the Board of Estimate hearing, in a proceeding entitled Matter of Murray v. … (Outlet Embroidery Co. v. Derwent Mills, 254 N. Y. 179 ; Wood v. Duff-Gordon, 222 N. Y. 88 .) 2.
Cited 5 timesPublished118 Misc. 2d 836 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1983
Mendolia v Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Fa *838 cility, 47 NY2d 779 ; People ex rel. Lane v Vincent, 32 NY2d 940 ). … (Kaminsky v Hammock, supra, p 758.)
Cited 1 timesPublished7 Johns. 468 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1811
In The Manhattan Company v. … The authorities for this proceeding are Brown v. Clark, (3 Johns. Rep. 443.) and the cases there, referred to; Dumond v. Carpenter, (2 Johns. Rep. 184.) Vicar v. Hayden, (Cowp. 841.) and Rex v. Ponsonby, (1 Wi is. 303.)
Cited 16 timesPublished24 Misc. 2d 381 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1960
In issue in this proceeding are the provisions of section 100 of the Highway Law which empower County Boards of Supervisors to appoint County Superintendents. … These cases are: Matter of Chase v. Falk (8 A D 2d 655, affd. 7 N Y 2d 817) and Matter of Neff v. Falk (10 A D 2d 789).
Cited 5 timesPublished161 Misc. 687 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1936
New York Electric Lines Co. v. Squire, 107 id. 593, at p. 601; Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment of City of New York, 232 id. 377, at pp. 392, 393.) … Einsfeld v. Murray [ 149 N. Y. 367 ]; Admiral Realty Co. v. City of N. Y. [206 id. 110]; Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment of City of New York, supra).
Cited 7 timesPublished177 Misc. 638 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1941
Where the controversy between the parties relates to the power of the Board to act at all, and a determination in favor of the plaintiff would render any further proceedings by the Board wholly superfluous, an action for … (Matter of Wallach’s, Inc., v. Boland, 253 App. Div. 371, 373 ; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland, 176 Misc. 258, 263 ; affd., 261 App. Div. 900 . See, also, Bank of Yorktown v. Boland, 280 N. Y. 673 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Johns. 278 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1813
on board, and sealed her hatches. … This was the doctrine of this court in the case of Schieffelin v. New-York Ins. Co. (9 Johns. Rep. 27.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedWilliamsburg Charter High School v. New York City Department of Education
36 Misc. 3d 810 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2012
(See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, *822 34 NY2d 222 , 231 [1974].) … (See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 , 231 [1974].)
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Hill & Den. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1844
(Vose v. Dean, 7 Mass. R. 280 ; Commonwealth v. Loveridge, 11 id. 337 ; *42 Commonwealth v. Otis, 16 id. 198; The People v. Brown, 23 Wend. 49, referring to 2 R. S. 286, § 59.) … Rep. 641 ; Commonwealth v. Downing, 9 id. 520; The People v. Blankman, 17 Wend. 252 ; The People v. Brown , 23 id. 47; Barb. Cr. Law, 503; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. 234 ; Waldo v. Spencer, 7 Conn. Rep. 71 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished201 Misc. 563 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1951
Act, § 876-a, subd. 10; May’s Furs v. Bauer, 282 N. Y. 331, 337-339 ; Strauss v. Steiner, 173 Misc. 521 ; but see Bond Stores v. Turner, 258 App. … Y. 188,198 ; see Building Service Union v. Gazzam, 339 U. S. 532, 540 , supra). It may be observed in this connection that Exchange Bakery v. Rifkin ( 245 N. Y. 260 ), Stillwell Theatre v. Kaplan ( 259 N.
Disagreed with by S. S. Pennock Co. v. Ferretti, 283 A.D. 527 (1954)Cited 1 timesPublishedVillage of Massena v. St. Lawrence Water Co.
126 Misc. 524 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1926
Co. v. Canal Board, 168 App. Div. 558 .) … Empire City Trotting Club v. State Racing Commission, 190 N. Y. 31 ; Matter of Ormsby v. Bell, 218 id. 212.)
Cited 3 timesPublishedSzold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.
159 Misc. 911 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1936
(Matter of Jensen v. Southern Pacific Co., 215 N. Y. 514 ; N. Y. Central R. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188 ; Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 id. 594; Miller Cabinet Co. v. … (Lawrence v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 239 Mass. 424 ; 132 N. E. 174 ; People v. Witte, 315 Ill. 282 ; 146 N. E. 178 .)
Cited 4 timesPublished116 Misc. 2d 655 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1982
Conduct v Schlesinger, 84 AD2d 879 ; Matter of Rainka v Whalen, 73 AD2d 731 .) … (People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645, 651-652 ; People v Blyden, 55 NY2d 73 ; People v Harris, 84 AD2d 63 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew York State Supreme Court Officers Ass'n v. New York State Unified Court System
2 Misc. 3d 960 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2004
Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 27 NY2d 292 [1970]). … The referenced decision, relying on both Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents ( 27 NY2d 292 ) and Matter of Silverman v State Liq.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna