Case law

McChesney v. City of Syracuse

27 N.Y.S. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1894

Weisemair v. City of Buffalo, 57 Hun, 48 , 10 N. Y. Supp. 569 ; McCorkle v. Herrman, 117 N. Y. 297 , 22 N. E. 948 ; Larkin v. McMullin, 120 N. Y. 206 , 24 N. E. 447 ; Van Clief v. Van Vechten, 130 N. Y. 571 , 29 N. … E. 1017 ; Hollister v. Mott, 132 N. Y. 18 , 29 N. E. 1103 ; French v. Bauer, 134 N. Y. 548 , 32 N. E. 77 ; Mack v. Colleran, 136 N. Y. 617 , 32 N. E. 604 ; Ogden v. Alexander, 140 N. Y. 356, 362 , 35 N. E. 638 .

Walentas v. Populizio

125 Misc. 2d 892 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1984

(Matter of Briar Hill Apts. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 44 AD2d 816 .) … (See Collingwood Enterprises v Gribetz, Supreme Ct, NY County, April 18, 1975, index No. 18192/73.)

Mollineaux v. Michaelis

29 Misc. 2d 933 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1961

While the respondents have some discretion, that discretion must be exercised within the standards and guides laid down by the Town Board (Matter of Bologno v. O’Connell, 7 N Y 2d 155). … Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm, 15 Misc 2d 10 , mod. 4 A D 2d 766) ”. (Matter of Rhodes v. Waters, 15 Misc 2d 119, 123 .)

Theobald v. United States Rubber Co.

83 Misc. 627 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1914

In Continental Securities Co. v. Belmont, supra, it was held: “No such authority exists in case of an act of the board of directors which is prohibited by law or which is against public policy. (Kent v. … (Continental Securities Co. v. Belmont, 206 N. Y. 7 ; Von Arnim v. American Tube Works, 188 Mass. 515 ; Russell v. Patterson Co., 232 Penn. St. 113.) ” In the case of Pollitz v. Wabash R. R.

Industrial Refuse Systems, Inc. v. O'Rourke

134 Misc. 2d 45 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1986

Light & Power Co. v City of New York, 48 App Div 14 ; Brooklyn City R. R. Co. v Whalen, 191 App Div 737 , affd 229 NY 570 ). … 374 ; Alexander v Detroit, 392 Mich 30 , 219 *54 NW2d 41 ; Szczurek v City of Park Ridge, 97 Ill App 3d 649, 422 NE2d 907 ).

D'Uva v. Wheeler

104 Misc. 2d 367 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1980

(Utley v St. Petersburg, 292 US 106 ; Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v City of Yonkers, 193 App Div 433 , affd 231 NY 558 , affd 261 US 155 ; Works v City of Lockport, 28 Hun 9 .) … (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 .) Application denied.

Stevens v. Orton

18 Misc. 538 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1896

Boyd v. McDonald, 35 N. Y. St. Repr. 484; Cragin v. Lovell, 88 N. Y. 258 . … Co. v. Nolan, 48 N.

Fleming v. Foley

43 Misc. 2d 280 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1964

The Board denied petitioners’ appeal in all respects. Both the Board and Adson, by separate notices of motion, have moved to dismiss the petition and sustain the Board’s determination. … Matter of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Auth. v. Foley, 34 Misc 2d 870 , affd. 17 A D 2d 811, affd. 12 N Y 2d 915.)

Lerner v. Power

3 Misc. 2d 287 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1956

Lerner received the letter of the Board of Elections on Saturday, June 16, 1956; he wrote and mailed his acceptance to the board on June 18, 1956. … Petitioner calls the court’s attention to Matter of Smith v.

In re People

81 Misc. 324 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1913

Highway Law, § 265; Matter of Toll Bridge, State v. Black Lake Bridge Co., 152 App. Div. 633 . … Weston v. Citizens' National Bank, 88 App. Div. 330 -336.

Balsam v. Fioriglio

41 Misc. 3d 361 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2013

Servs. v DiLascio, 176 AD2d 312 [1991]).” (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Bank v Cohen at 755.) … The Court, in Frankson v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. ( 67 AD3d 213, 217-218 [2d Dept 2009]), instructed: “Unlike res judicata and collateral estoppel, which ‘are rigid rules of limitation,’ the law of the case doctrine

People ex rel. Jones v. Saxe

92 Misc. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1915

Callahan v. Board of Education, 78 App. Div. 505 ; affd. 174 N.Y. 169 . It is not contended that in the case at bar there was any change made in the position held by the relator. … Matter of Rudd v. Cropsey, 159 App. Div. 275 ; Sauerbrunn v. Board of Education, 150 id. 407.

Woodward v. Continental Charters, Inc.

203 Misc. 581 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1952

(See Parker v. Marco, 136 N. Y. 585 , and Netograph Mfg. Co. v. Scrugham, 197 N. Y. 377 .) The plaintiffs assert that his attendance was the result of legal compulsion, while the defendant claims that it was voluntary. … Under the general powers of the board, conferred in section 425, the board may conduct investigations and make such rules, regulations and adopt such procedures as it shall deem necessary to carry out its functions.

Foley v. McNab

42 Misc. 2d 460 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1964

Furman v. Clute, 50 N. Y. 451, 465 ; see, also, 133 A. L. R 334). Such a result would be subversive of the popular will (People ex rel. Stalter v. Lynch, supra). … The respondents Commissioners of the Board of Elections as the canvassing board properly certified the election of Mr. Griaccone.

Smith v. Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Co.

25 N.Y.S. 368 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1893

Munson v. Railroad Co., 103 N. Y. 58 ,. 8 N. E. Rep. 355; Risley v. Railroad Co., 62 N. Y. 240 ; Conkey v. Bond, 34 Barb. 276 , affirmed 36 N. Y. 427 ; Oil Co. v. Marbury, 91 U. S. 587 ; Wardell v. Railroad Co., 103 U. … Salomons v. Pender, 3 Hurl. & C. 639; Harrington v. Dock Co., 3 Q. B. Div. 549; Smith v. Sorby, Id. 553; Panama & S. P. Tel. Co. v. India Rubber, G. P. & T. Works Co., 10 Ch. App. 515; Mayor, etc., of Salford v.

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Podeyn

51 Misc. 2d 555 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1966

Beresford v. Sexton, 284 N. Y. 145 ; People ex rel. Parklin Operating Corp. v. Miller, 287 N. Y. 126 ; Lee & Le Forestier, Review and Reduction of Real Property Assessments, § 1:21, p. 20). … Hotel Paramount Corp. v. Chambers, 298 N. Y. 372 , revg. 273 App. Div. 962 ; People ex rel. New York Stock Exch. Bldg. Co. v. Cantor, 221 App. Div. 193 , affd. 248 N. Y. 533 ).

Marland v. Ambach

93 Misc. 2d 328 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1978

Nor, since petitioners were probationers at the time of termination, was there any due process right to a hearing here (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 ; Huntley v Community School Bd. of Brooklyn, 543 F2d 979). … Further, the scope of review of determinations of the Commissioner of Education is limited to the question of " 'whether there is a rational basis for the administrative orders’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d

Becker v. Barry

165 Misc. 877 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1937

Everson v. Lorillard ( 135 N. … Matter of Becker v. Eisner ( 277 N. Y. 143 ).

Hyatt v. Wood

3 Johns. 239 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1808

(a) Goodrich v. Walker, January term, 1800. Brantingham v. Fay, April term, 1800. Malin v. Brown, January term, 1803. See 2 Tidd, K. B. Prac. (2d ed. 812.) In Wilson v. Rastall, (4 Term, 753.)

Jackson v. City of New York

182 Misc. 686 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1943

(Goodrich v. McDonald, 112 N. Y. 157 ; Robinson v. Rogers, 237 N. Y. 467 .) The lien created by statute is merely an extension of the common-law charging lien. (Matter of Sebring, 238 App. Div. 281 .) … The authority of the Industrial Board does not extend to actions prosecuted under the process of this court. Nor do I construe the concluding sentence in the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Curtin v.