Case law

People ex rel. Brooks v. Watts

26 N.Y.S. 280 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1893

Cronin v. Stoddard, 97 N. Y. 274 ; Horton v. Parsons, 37 Hun, 45 ; People v. Board of Trustees, 59 Hun, 206 , 13 N. Y. Supp. 447 ; People v. Crissey, 91 N. Y. 635 . … Goillotel v. Mayor, 87 N. Y. 443 .

Pike v. New York State Division of Parole

148 Misc. 2d 331 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1990

The Appellate Board of the Division of Parole subsequently affirmed the decision. … (Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69 ; Matter of Harris v New York State Bd. of Parole, 114 AD2d 897 ; People ex rel. Yates v Walters, 111 AD2d 839 ; see, Correction Law § 805.)

Newton v. Lewis

118 Misc. 382 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1922

Philips v. Bury, 1 Ld. Raym. 5; Green v. Rutherforth, 1 Ves. Sr. 462. In the case of Murdock v. Visitors of Philips Academy, 24 Mass. 303, 322 , Chief Judge Parker referring to the case of Philips v. … (Chitty) 230; Eden v. Foster, 2 P. Wms. 325, 326; 3 Black. Comm. 48; Philips v. Bury, 2 T. R. 346, 352.

Village of Larchmont v. Sutton

30 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1961

The first board, colored red, is lettered 1 ‘ Real Estate”; the second, colored white, is lettered “ Thomas B. Sutton Corporation, Licensed Real Estate Broker ”; the third board, colored blue, is lettered “ Insurance ”. … or sign boards be less than ten feet (10') behind and within the property lines of the parcel shown on the sketch submitted by the applicant and said signs or sign boards shall be limited to two in number, all in accordance

People v. New York & Staten Island Ferry Co.

49 How. Pr. 511 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1875

By an act of the legislature of this state, passed March 30, 1855 (chapter 121, Laws of 1855), a board of five commissioners was created, as declared in the title thereof, “for the preservation of the harbor of New York from … the question is presented as if the king and parliament had concurred in the grant, as the patent to Gore issued under and by virtue of an act of the legislature, and this distinction is well recognized (See opinion of Brown

In re Davis

103 Misc. 2d 786 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1980

It is urged on behalf of the candidate Schmidt that this court lacks the power to annul the election for irregularities in the voting, citing Matter of Corrigan v Board of Elections of Suffolk County ( 38 AD2d 825 , affd … In this connection see Matter of Monkarsh v Kurtz ( 44 AD2d 700 ) cited with approval in Matter of Doherty v Mahoney ( 42 NY2d 1069, 1071 ).

Howard v. Town of Brighton

143 Misc. 265 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1931

Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y. 317, at p. 323 ; Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 id. 222, 234; People ex rel. Everett v. Board of Supervisors of Ulster County, 93 id. 397, 403; People ex rel. Van Keuren v. … Board of Town Auditors, 74 id. 310; People ex rel. McCabe v. Matthies, 179 id. 242.)

Prendergast v. Cohalan

101 Misc. 712 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1917

D, citing County Board of Supervisors, etc., v. Parker, 3 Wall. 93 , U. S. Sup. Ct. The respondents are judicial officers of the state (London v. Mayor, J. & S. 46, and Matter of Runk, 200 N. … Olmstead v. Meahl, N. Y. L. J. Dec. 2, 1916.

Lewin v. LaGuardia

175 Misc. 165 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1940

Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrick ( 279 N. Y. 246 ); Matter of Hetherington v. McGoldrick (Id. 687); Matter of Rosenthal v. … Matter of Danker v. Board of Health ( 266 N. Y. 365 ), one of the cases relied upon by the petitioners, is not expressive of an opposite view.

Larkin v. Village of Brockport

34 N.Y.S. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1895

This is not in conflict with Kehn v. State, 93 N. Y. 291 , or Riley v. Mayor, 96 N. Y. 331 . … In the case of Riley v.

People ex rel. Scudder v. Cooper

27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 486 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1880

In Dawley v. Brown ( 43 How., 22 ), the sheriff had delivered possession after a judgment in ejectment on the seventh of April. The judgment was set aside on the eighth. … It does not appear that she had any rights in the house except that she boarded with Scudder.

Shearman v. Iroquois Hotel & Apartment Co.

42 Misc. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1903

In Porter v. … It thus had the ordinary characteristics of a lease, and is not the case of a contract between the keeper of a boarding house and a lodger. See White v.

Donlin v. Carlow

120 Misc. 698 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1923

Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 200 App. Div. 460, 465 ; Birdsall v. Reid, 188 id. 46; Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Osborn v. Hughes, 128 App. Div. 128 ; Brown v. Powers, 53 id. 251 . In General Investment Co. v. … Brown v. Robinson, 224 N. Y. 301, 318 ; Guggenheimer v. Geisler, 81 id. 293. The agreement of March 14, 1922, constitutes a joint venture and syndicate in the acquisition and disposal of properties located in Brazil.

Country Ridge Club Inc. v. Posillipo

14 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1958

by said board. … (See Matter of Narragansett Inn v. Mielke, 134 N. Y. S. 2d 363 and case cited therein.)

People v. Nissen

97 Misc. 2d 1000 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1979

Co. v Chicago, 211 US 306), the ordering of a health quarantine (Campagnie Francaise v Board of Health, 186 US 380 ), and the requiring of compulsory smallpox vaccinations (Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 US 11 ). … In United States v Hillstrom (533 F2d 209, cert den 429 US 1038 ), marihuana was seized by the Coast Guard while on board the vessel to make a safety and documentation inspection.

Bevan v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System

74 Misc. 2d 443 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1973

of Regents v. … The case cited by defendants, Matter of Chavich v. Board of Examiners of Bd. of Educ. of City of N.

Robinson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

65 Barb. 146 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1873

This case surely furnishes no support to the position of Leonard, J., in Brown v. The N. Y. Cent. R. R. Co., (supra.) … It must not be overlooked, in passing on this question, that in the case of Brown v. The N. Y. Cent. R. R. Co., ( 32 N.

In re Brown

38 Misc. 157 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1902

Hadley v. Mayor, 33 N. Y. 603 , cited by respondent’s, counsel, is not an authority in support of the cláim that the clerk’s certificate cannot be attacked collaterally. … In that case the clerk certified truly the determination of the board of canvassers. The court held that the determination of the board could not be impeached collaterally.

Buffalo & Jamestown Railroad v. Clark

29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 359 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1880

Wilson, 2 Hill, 153 ; Hamilton & Deansville Plank Road Co. v. Rice, supra; Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Brown, 29 Barb., 335 ; Buffalo & New York City R. R. Co. v. Dudley, 14 N. Y., 336 ; Buffalo & Pittsburgh R. … Co. v. Hatch, 20 Id., 157.)

Murphy v. Delaney

179 Misc. 436 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1943

Ajas v. Board of Education, 104 App. Div. 162 ; Bentley v. Jeacock, 14 N. Y. S. 2d 366.) The denials contained in the answer are perfunctory and raise no triable issue of fact. … The Board of Transportation is authorized to fix the wages of its employees. (Matter of Colbert v. Delaney, 249 App. Div. 209 ; affd., 273 N. Y. 626 .)