Case law

De Angelis v. Minor

8 Misc. 2d 994 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1957

Matter of Von der Heide v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 204 Misc. 746 , affd. 282 App. Div. 1076 ). … (See, e.g., Pierro v. Baxendale, 20 N. J. 17.) My decision, however, must be made on the record presented and on the reasons given in the decision of the board.

Newton v. Lewis

118 Misc. 382 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1922

Philips v. Bury, 1 Ld. Raym. 5; Green v. Rutherforth, 1 Ves. Sr. 462. In the case of Murdock v. Visitors of Philips Academy, 24 Mass. 303, 322 , Chief Judge Parker referring to the case of Philips v. … (Chitty) 230; Eden v. Foster, 2 P. Wms. 325, 326; 3 Black. Comm. 48; Philips v. Bury, 2 T. R. 346, 352.

Sholes v. Sholes

17 Misc. 2d 796 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1959

Y. 514 ; Citron v. Citron, 5 Misc 2d 1004 ; Immerman v. Immerman, 230 App. Div. 458 ). Moreover, the period which may be covered by the financial examination is not limited to the time the agreements were made (Brown v. … Brown, 239 N. Y. 518 ), but rather from some reasonable time before the agreements were signed up to the present (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 230 App. Div. 483 ).

Pike v. New York State Division of Parole

148 Misc. 2d 331 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1990

The Appellate Board of the Division of Parole subsequently affirmed the decision. … (Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69 ; Matter of Harris v New York State Bd. of Parole, 114 AD2d 897 ; People ex rel. Yates v Walters, 111 AD2d 839 ; see, Correction Law § 805.)

Horn v. McEntee

33 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1962

The respondents, Board of Water Commissioners and Charles S. … The respondent Board of Supervisors appeared specially, objects to and attacks the jurisdiction of this court on the same grounds.

New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Pataki

188 Misc. 2d 776 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2001

(Matter of Boung Jae Jang v Brown, 161 AD2d 49, 55 ; see also, McCain v Koch, 70 NY2d 109 .) *780 Courts have been, and continue to be, called upon to protect the rights of the indigent and the administration of the courts … (See, Singleton v Wulff, 428 US 106, 114-116 ; Eisenstadt v Baird, 405 US 438, 444-445 ; Griswold v Connecticut, 381 US 479, 481 ; United States v Musto, 540 F Supp 346, 353 ; People v Gary M., 138 Misc 2d 1081, 1091 .)

Trim v. Milham

42 Misc. 2d 348 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1964

(Matter of Schilt v. Murphy, N. Y. L. J., Aug. 18, 1961, p. 3, col. 7; Matter of Del Gaudio v. Zurmuhlen, 29 Misc 2d 84 .) … (Matter of Van Allen v. McCleary, 27 Misc 2d 81 ; Matter of Leonard v. Horton, 278 App. Div. 62 ; Matter of Buffalo Audio Center Arrolite Co. v. Union Free School Dist., 29 Misc 2d 871 , affd. 15 AD 2d 991 .)

Jackson ex dem. Hudson v. Alexander

3 Johns. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1808

In Fisher v. … In Lansing v.

In re South Market Street

27 N.Y.S. 843 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1894

Dakin v. Hudson, 6 Cow. 221 ; Cornell v. Barnes, 7 Hill, 35 ; People v. Koeber, Id. 40 ; Corwin v. Merritt, 3 Barb. 343 . … In Sharp v.

Van Hoevenbergh v. Hasbrouck

45 Barb. 197 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1865

He could not sue, nor by mandamus compel the board of supervisors to audit the bill. … In King v. Butler, ( 15 John. 281 ,) an overseer of the poor was held responsible for board and necessaries furmshed a pauper at the request of .the overseer.

Sweet v. City of Syracuse

20 N.Y.S. 924 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1892

Van Gelder v. Van Gelder, 84 N. Y. 658 ; In re New York, W. S. & B. Ry. Co., 28 Hun, 505 ; Fischer v. Langbein, 31 Hun, 272 ; Everson v. Gehrman, 2 Abb. Pr. 413 . … Murray v. Jones, (Sup.) 2 N Y. Supp. 486; Newton v. Harris, 8 Barb. 306 . That it worked a temporary suspension of all proceedings under that judgment may be.

Maniscalco v. Power

8 Misc. 2d 677 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1957

The same petition also purports to nominate the following candidates: Albert V. Maniscalco, for President, Borough of Bichmond; Edward V. … The provisions of the rule with respect to service is not a mere procedural directive, but is mandatory and may not be disregarded (Matter of Rafferty v. Cohen, 268 App.

Incorporated Village v. Guardian Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

87 Misc. 2d 344 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1976

Lunmor Homes v Johnson, 122 NYS2d 149 ), and section 18C(3) must be construed solely as providing an interim safeguard to the planning board until performance bonds guaranteeing installation of improvements were posted. … clearly foreshadowed, see, e.g., Allen v State Board of Elections, supra [393 US], at 572.

McGregor v. McGregor

55 Misc. 3d 586 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2017

Such a relationship is created where one party entrusts to another some money or property with respect to which such other is bound to reveal his or her dealings (Byrd v Brown, 208 AD2d 582, 583 [2d Dept 1994]; Kastle v Steibel … “Rather, [a] constructive trust will be erected whenever necessary to satisfy the demands of justice” (Byrd v Brown, 208 AD2d 582, 583 [1994] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Latham v Father Divine, 299 NY 22, 26 [1949

Potsdam Central School District No. 2 v. Frank

56 Misc. 2d 605 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

Y. 464 ; Matter of Lyons v. Goldstein, 290 N. Y. 19 ). … 687 ’s petition, the court views the recent case of Matter of Civil Service Employees Assn. v.

Currier v. New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railroad

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 355 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

In substance it states that defendants Winslow, Woorrishoffer and Porter, with their-associates, in some way acquired the control of the board of directors of the railroad company and filled it with their creatures and instruments … Co., 2 Federal Rep., 877; Wardell v. N. P. R. R. Co., 4 Dillon, 330; Barnes v. Brown, 11 Hun, 315 ; 80 N. Y., 535 .)

Murphy v. Delaney

179 Misc. 436 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1943

Ajas v. Board of Education, 104 App. Div. 162 ; Bentley v. Jeacock, 14 N. Y. S. 2d 366.) The denials contained in the answer are perfunctory and raise no triable issue of fact. … The Board of Transportation is authorized to fix the wages of its employees. (Matter of Colbert v. Delaney, 249 App. Div. 209 ; affd., 273 N. Y. 626 .)

Lyon v. City of Brooklyn

28 Barb. 609 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858

By the, Court, Brown, J. … Co. v. The Town of Canaan, 16 Barb. 244 ; Bouton v. The Gity of Brooklyn, 15 id. 395.)

Hagan v. Moses

173 Misc. 327 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1939

More, that section required the concurrence of the board of aldermen and the board of estimate and apportionment as to the fixation of salaries. … The board of aldermen alone had no power to make the grant, nor did the head of the park department. (Thoma v. City of New York, 263 N. Y., 402, 405 .)

Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Town of West Seneca

172 Misc. 2d 287 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1997

Co. v Rosenberg, 82 NY2d 364, 372-373 , supra.) … Co. v Rosenberg, supra; Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. v Hoffman, supra.) *291 For the above-stated reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted to the extent that the Town Board shall consider Sprint’s pending applications under