Case law

Aronson v. Crane

139 Misc. 2d 744 · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 1988

(See, Rossi v Simms, 119 AD2d 137 ; Civil Rights Law § 19-a.) Defendants are quite correct regarding the approval powers of a board of directors. … (See also, Goldstone v Constable, 84 AD2d 519 ; Van Camp v Sherman, 132 AD2d 453, 454 ; see generally, Jamil v South-ridge Coop., Section 4, 93 Misc 2d 383, 385 [bad faith or breach of trust on the part of directors renders

J. J. Newberry Co. v. Kinnaw

198 Misc. 321 · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 1950

Bank v. Lewis, supra.) … Bank v.

Kerner v. Town of Clifton Park

178 Misc. 2d 845 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1998

the constitutionality or validity of a local law or ordinance (Press v County of Monroe, 50 NY2d 695 ; Matter of Pokoik v Department of Health Servs., 185 AD2d 929 ). … Sander, 92 NY2d 244, 253 ; Matter of FYM Clinical Lab. v Perales, 147 AD2d 840 , affd 74 NY2d 539 ; Matter of Devereaux v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 75 AD2d 277 ).

Glass v. Department of Health

64 Misc. 2d 880 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1970

Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 302 N. Y. 94 .) In Schnepel (supra, p. 96 ) the court expressly repudiated the contrary dictum expressed in Lewis v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 258 N. … Y. 117 ) which was the predicate for the holding in *884 Judd v. Board of Educ. ( 278 N. Y. 200 ). (See, also, Matter of Rumble v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 27 Misc 2d 939 .)

Nevins, Inc. v. Boland

167 Misc. 428 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1938

The question proposed by this motion is analogous to that raised in several matters recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (Myers v. Bethelem Shipbuilding Corporation, Myers v. MacKenzie, 303 U. … Support is found for this contention especially in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company v. Schauffler and United States v. Illinois Central R. Co. ( 291 U. S. 457, 463 ).

In re the Arbitration between Pasch & Chemoleum Corp.

26 Misc. 2d 918 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1960

(Maritime Bd. v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U. S. 481, 503 .) By the Shipping Act of 1960 Congress excepted such arrangements approved by the Federal Maritime Board from the prohibition of the antitrust laws. … United States, 239 F. 2d 933 ), determined that such contract was unlawful per se and could not be approved by the Federal Maritime Board. Upon appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States (Federal Maritime Bd. v.

People v. Alvarez

88 Misc. 2d 709 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1976

(People v Brown, supra, pp 386-394 .) … As concluded by Justice Quinn (People v Cuvilje, 85 Misc 2d 628, 632 ) after reviewing the Appellate Division, First Department decision in People v Brown ( 48 AD2d 95 ): "If, as Brown teaches, that order of dismissal is

Koffler v. Weiss

48 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1965

Two separate Liberal party certificates of nomination were filed with the board. They are essentially identical as to nominees except that one contains four more than the other. … This calls for an exercise of judgment and discretion, making the act to be performed by respondents a judicial one (Matter of Wicksel v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 446 ).

Cody v. Kelley

184 Misc. 150 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1945

On May 6,1944, the Board received a letter from plaintiff, dated May 4, 1944, advising the Board that plaintiff did not desire to intervene in the proceeding. … (Matter *154 of Wallach’s, Inc., v. Boland, 277 N. Y. 345 , affg. 253 App. Div. 371 ; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland, 176 Misc. 258 , affd. 261 App. Div. 900 ; see, also, A. F. of L. v. Labor Board, 308 U.

McBride v. Ashley

91 Misc. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1915

Irish v. … Maloney v. Katzenstein, 135 App. Div. 224 ; Western N. Y. W. Co. v. Laughlin, 82 Misc.

Mertz v. Mertz

158 Misc. 85 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1935

(Caplan v. Caplan, 268 N. Y. 445 ; Schubert v. Schubert Wagon Co., 249 id. 253; Allen v. Allen, 246 id. 571.) … (Brown v. Brown, 88 Conn. 42, 44 ; 89 A. 889 .) The courts of this State interpret a substantially similar enactment otherwise. (Perlman v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 117 Misc. 353 ; affd., 202 App. Div. 822 .)

Westgate v. Shirley

42 Misc. 245 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1903

Pro., § 1207; Argall v. Pitts, 78 N. Y. 239 ; Bullard v. Sherwood, 85 id. 253 . … Hawkins v. Mapes-Reeves Const. Co., 82 App. Div. 72 ; Schillinger Cement Co. v. Arnott, 152 N. Y. 584 .

Blair v. Local 100 of the Transport Workers Union of America

106 Misc. 2d 1018 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1980

Blake v Biscardi, 52 AD2d 834 ; see, also, Schlosser v United Presbyt. Home at Syosset, 56 AD2d 615 .) Prior to commencing the hearing the parties consented to release defendant Transit Authority. … (See Madden v Atkins, 4 NY2d 283, 291 ; Keller v Lindelof, 268 App Div 877 .) Plaintiffs’ contention that the presiding officer voted twice is without merit.

Bogart v. M'Donald

2 Johns. Cas. 219 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1801

(Brown v. Beauchamp, 5 Monr. 417.) … (Brown v. Knill, 5 Moore, 164 ; 2 B. & B. 395.)

Smith v. Ellerbe

141 Misc. 2d 699 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1988

(Montant v Moore, supra; Small v De Bruyn, 187 Misc 1045 ; Paul Pleating & Stitching Co. v Levine, supra; McCutcheon Realty Corp. v Kilb, supra.) … (Halpin v Mutual Brewing Co., 20 App Div 583 ; Christ v Lake Erie Distribs., supra; United Growers Co. v Eisner, 22 App Div 1 .)

Wadsworth v. Erwin

124 Misc. 893 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1925

(Stetler v. McFarlane, 230 N. Y. 400 .) Good faith is a defense in one case but not in the other. … (Wallace v. Jones, 195 N. Y. 511 ; Daly v. Haight, 224 id. 726.)

Cohn v. Townsend

48 Misc. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1905

Flynn v. Union Surety & Guaranty Co., 170 N. Y. 145, 147 . … Lindenmuller v. People, 33 Barb. 548, 569 . The transaction of public business on Sunday is prohibited, therefore, because of the character of the day as a civil institution.

Casey v. Tieman

124 Misc. 2d 222 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1984

In Weimer v Board of Educ. ( 75 AD2d 893 ), the Appellate Division, Second Department, however, affirmed a decision from the Supreme Court in Suffolk County which appears *224 to have held to the contrary. … Thomas Casey is a necessary party in the Collins lawsuit solely because he is an incumbent in the position sought by her (see Kirkland v Board of Educ., 49 AD2d 693 ; Dreyfuss v Board of Educ., 42 AD2d 845 ), and not because

Smith v. City of Buffalo

51 Misc. 216 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1906

Dailey v. City of New Haven, 60 Conn. 314 ; New Orleans R. Co. v. Mayor, 39 La. Ann. 127 . … of the park board is final, without approval by the mayor or any other executive officer. *219 The principal point of alleged illegality, as against the park board, lies in the fact that that board failed to give public

Schieffelin v. Harvey

6 Johns. 170 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1810

They are liable for goods stolen or embezzled on board the ship, by the crew or any other-persons, although no negligence may be imputable to them. … Morse v. Slue, 1 Ventr. 190. 238. T. Raym. 220. Malloy, book 2. c. 2. s. 12. Hob. 17. Cro.