Case law

Allied Mutuals Liability Insurance v. Interstate Cork Co.

134 Misc. 504 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1929

The Industrial Board itself is without power to reform the policy as it has no equity powers. (Svolos v. Marsch & Co., 195 App. Div. 675 ; Hamberger v. Wolf e-Smith Co., 215 id. 739 .) … Justice Woodward, in writing the prevailing, opinion in Svolos v. Marsch & Co.

Long Island Land Research Bureau, Inc. v. Young

7 Misc. 2d 469 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1957

for such findings (Matter of Moudis v. … Because of a statement made in the answering affidavit of one of the respondent board members, the court deems it proper to comment upon a problem which has troubled many boards in the past and which will recur upon a renewal

Ufier v. Baldwin

33 Misc. 2d 848 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1961

The Board of Appeals on proof of practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship could grant an extension (Matter of Chandler v. Corbett, 274 App. Div. 1073 ; Matter of Karl v. … Board of Appeals, 165 Misc. 156, 157 ).” (Matter of Crossroads Recreation v. Broz, 4 N Y 2d 39, 42.)

Philan Insurance v. Hall

170 Misc. 2d 729 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1996

(Supra, at 456-457; see also, Matter of Halyalkar v Board of Regents, 72 NY2d 261 [1988]; S.D.I. Corp. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Cos., 208 AD2d 706 [2d Dept 1994].) … , Inc., 215 AD2d 530 [2d Dept 1995]; Browning Ave.

Hasenbein v. Siebert

106 Misc. 2d 94 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1980

(Rothschild v Manufacturers Trust Co., 279 NY 355 ; Shepherd v Mount Vernon Trust Co., 269 NY 234 .) … The Appellate Division, Second Department, in People v Dobbs Ferry Med.

Caso v. Gotbaum

67 Misc. 2d 205 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1971

(Flamm v. Van Nierop, 56 Misc 2d 1059 .) … (Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325 ; Buckley v. Baldwin, 230 App. Div. 245 ; Wollitzer v. Title Guar. Trust Co., 148 Misc. 529 , affd. 241 App. *212 Div. 757 .)

Davis v. Regan

82 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1975

This article 78 proceeding is brought to review the determination of the New York State Board of Parole. … Sammarco v Le Fevre, 78 Misc 2d 882 .)

Koontz v. Astronics Corp.

108 Misc. 2d 1049 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1981

Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 NY2d 521 ; Cohon & Co. v Russell, 23 NY2d 569 ; Bradkin v Leverton, 26 NY2d 192 ; Small v Marchese, 98 Misc 2d 295 ). … Minichiello v Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 NY2d, at p 526 ).

Rosett v. Heffernan

187 Misc. 598 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1946

A year later the question arose and was answered in Matter of Peel v. Cohen (265 N. Y, 312, supra). … (Matter of Trosk v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 430 ; Matter of Straus, 265 N.

Carter v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

31 Misc. 3d 430 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2010

(Matter of Lubin v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 974, 976 [1983]; see Matter of Edwards v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 190 AD2d 545 , 545 [1st Dept 1993], citing Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v City … (Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760 [1996]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

Dobish v. State

54 Misc. 2d 367 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1967

Subsequently, on July 12,1967, in Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors of County of Washington (20 N Y 2d 244) and Saratogian, Inc. v. … Board of Supervisors of County of Washington, supra, p. 251; Saratogian, Inc. v.

Sheehan v. Delaney

182 Misc. 57 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1943

The chairman of the Board of Transportation submitted an affidavit in which he summarized the evidence against the petitioner at the hearing before the Board. … Allen v. Welles, 14 Misc. 226 ; People ex rel. Fitzpatrick v. French, 32 Hun 112 ; People ex rel. Wood v. Dept. of Health of the City of New York, 144 App. Div. 628 , affd. 202 N.

MacDonald v. Tompkins

67 Misc. 2d 338 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1971

(Curry v. Board of Educ., 60 Misc 2d 651 ; Matter of George v. Fiore, 62 Misc 2d 429 .) … This is consistent, because section 3214 (subd. 6, par. c) requires such a review by appeal to the Board of Education. (Cu rry v. Board of Educ., 60 Misc 2d 651 , supra; N. Y. Legis.

Thomas v. Wells

176 Misc. 682 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1941

(Matter of High v. Board of Education, 169 Misc. 98 ; Ticknor v. Potter, 246 App. Div. 556 .) … Mullarkey v. Board of Supervisors, 180 App. Div. 125 .)

Pomerantz v. Lehmann

55 Misc. 2d 315 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1967

Therefore, when the City Council enacted section 24-96 (subd [C] [1]) it had no right to authorize the Board of Appeals to restrict a use on the basis of need alone. As stated in Green Point Sav. Bank v. … (Fischer v. City of St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361 .) ” In Matter of Cunningham v. Planning Board (157 N. Y.

Samuelsen v. Walder

29 Misc. 3d 225 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2010

Board rescinded that AABB. … Matter of Edmead v McGuire, 67 NY2d 714, 716 [1986]; see also Blackman v New York City Hous.

Cordaro v. Lawley

30 Misc. 2d 130 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1961

Mars Associates, Inc. v. Palmer

140 Misc. 2d 1005 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1988

(Matter of Jacobs v Altman, 69 NY2d 733, 735 [1987]; Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 354 [1986].) … (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 579-580 [1975].)

O'Connor v. McGivney

144 Misc. 2d 396 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1989

A Board of Elections’ statutory power extends only to a ministerial examination of the legal sufficiency of a designating petition (Matter of Frankel v Cheshire, 212 App Div 664 ). … A Board has no power to pass on any question of fact or on matters not appearing on the face of the petition (Matter of McGovern v Olson, 291 NY 104 ).

Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Moore

6 Misc. 2d 1031 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1955

Co. v. … Ct., Albany County [1953]), which are also cited by the city and State Board. In People ex rel. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v.