Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Loos v. City of New York

    170 Misc. 104 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1939

    Burr v. Zeyst ( 23 N. Y. 140 ) the court, in referring to a Massachusetts case (Taylor v. … The court then referred to People v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hirschmann v. Hassapoyannes

    16 Misc. 3d 1014 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2007

    (See Hirschmann v Hassapoyannes, 11 Misc 3d 265 [Sup Ct, NY County 2005].) The facts will not be repeated here except to the extent necessary. Initially, the board of directors of 20166 Tenants Corp. … ]; Mitchell v Shane, 350 F3d 39, 47 [2d Cir 2003]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Valton v. National Loan Fund Life Assurance Society

    22 Barb. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1854

    (See Kimball v. Davis, 19 Wend. 437 ; Brown v. Kimball , 25 id. 259 ; Smith v. Griffith, 3 Hill, 333 .) … It came before Lord Abinger twice, at the circuit, in Wainwright v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peloquin v. Arsenault

    162 Misc. 2d 306 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1994

    The use of hand-held or other unobtrusive audio tape recorders is settled — they are permitted (Mitchell v Board of Educ., 113 AD2d 924 [1985]). … Hand-held audio recorders are unobtrusive (Mitchell v *309 Board of Educ., supra); camcorders may or may not be depending, as we have seen, on the circumstances.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Weinstock v. Long

    29 Misc. 2d 795 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1961

    Y. 637 ; Matter of Kay v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y., supra; People ex rel. Sherrill v. Guggenheimer, supra; Adee v. Arnow, 91 Hun 329 ; Portsmouth v. New Hampshire Nat. Bank, 76 N. H. 577; cf. Walters v. … Thus, in Adee v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kessel v. D'Amato

    97 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1979

    In addition, this court in Matter of Kamlet v Board of Educ. (91 Mise 2d 1105) concluded that planning sessions wherein oral reports were received from employees of the school system as well as prospective contractors were … In support of their claim of noncompliance by the board with section 305 of the Charter, the petitioners direct the attention of the court to People v Tremaine ( 281 NY 1 ); Matter of Block v Sprague ( 285 NY 69 ); and Matter

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Barnathan v. Kramer

    44 Misc. 2d 203 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1964

    Moreover, in Hewlett v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sullivan County Harness Racing Ass'n v. City of Schenectady Off-Track Betting Commission

    76 Misc. 2d 558 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1973

    This act by the Board has support in the laws and is, therefore, conclusive (Matter of Swalbach v. State Liq. Auth. of State of N. … Y., 7 N Y 2d 518, 526) and the sole test of judicial review is to determine whether the agency (Board) acted arbitrarily or capriciously (Matter of Fink v. Cole, 1 N Y 2d 48, 53).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Karasz v. Wallace

    133 Misc. 2d 520 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1986

    Although the threshold for requiring SEQRA compliance is "relatively low” (Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Planning Bd., 96 AD2d 986 ), the court concludes that the Zoning Board appropriately considered relevant environmental … The court finds that the decision of the Zoning Board not *525 to require SEQRA review of this application for a special use permit was not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion (Matter of Jackson v New York State

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montross v. Wheeler

    4 Lans. 99 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1871

    (Dakin v. Demming, 6 Paige, 95 .) … (Curtis v. Stillwell, 32 Barb., 354 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re the Arbitration between Central School District No. 1 & Mahopac Teachers Ass'n

    72 Misc. 2d 503 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1972

    Finally, the power to grant tenure to teachers is vested exclusively in the Board of Education. It is not an arbitrable issue. (See Legislative Conference of City Univ. of N. Y. v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. … Y., 38 AD 2d 478;Matter of McMaster v. Owens, 275 App. Div. 506 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Christ v. Dodd

    91 Misc. 2d 250 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1977

    After a canvass and recanvass of the votes cast at said election the Board of Elections certified the total vote to be 1774 for D’Agostino and 1765 for petitioner Christ. … Santangelo, 15 AD2d 341 ; Matter of De Martini v Power, 27 NY2d 149 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guariglia v. De Furio

    34 Misc. 2d 200 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1962

    Co. v. … (Lewis v. Smith, 109 Misc. 694 , affd. 190 App. Div. 884 ; Mullooly v. Union Free School Dist. No. 8, 20 Misc 2d 795 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Newman

    100 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1979

    (Matter of Howard v Wyman, 28 NY2d 434 .) However, the agency may not under the guise of administering the statute ascribe a different or unreasonable meaning to its terms. … (Matter *210 of Mounting & Finishing Co. v McGoldrick, 294 NY 104 ; 1 NY Jur, Administrative Law, § 191.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Paris v. Eisenberg

    35 Misc. 2d 934 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1962

    association is presently authorized to build and maintain a float or dock, a right which has for some time been the subject of litigation in the courts (Paris v. … The proposed float was a structure (Caddy v. Interborough R. T. Co., 195 N. Y. 415 ). Furthermore, a permit was issued. (3) That petitioner has no standing to bring this proceeding.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seward v. Beach

    29 Barb. 239 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1859

    By the Court, Brown, J. … (Colburn v. Swett, 1 Metc. 232 . Barnard v. Gostling and another, 2 East, 569, Fleming qui tam v. Bailey, 5 id. 513. Bacon’s Abr., Action qui tarn, A.) [Dutchess General Term, May 9, 1859.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of New York v. DeCosta

    176 Misc. 2d 936 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1998

    ’s authority and must be prohibited (Matter of Levitt v Board of Collective Bargaining, supra, at 127). … Limitations on the School Board’s access to a teacher’s personnel file was found to violate the public policy of the School Board’s responsibility to employ only qualified teachers (see, Board of Educ. v Areman, 41 NY2d 527

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schieffelin v. Kelliher

    132 Misc. 356 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1928

    The motion for a temporary injunction in that litigation was denied, but the Appellate Division (Brown v. Craig, 209 App. … As soon as the Appel *359 late Division affirmed the Special Term (Schieffelin v. Lakey, 213 App. Div. 865 ), the three defendants specified amended their answers in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Koontz v. Astronics Corp.

    108 Misc. 2d 1049 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1981

    Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 NY2d 521 ; Cohon & Co. v Russell, 23 NY2d 569 ; Bradkin v Leverton, 26 NY2d 192 ; Small v Marchese, 98 Misc 2d 295 ). … Minichiello v Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 NY2d, at p 526 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grundman v. Town of Brighton

    5 Misc. 2d 1006 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1956

    The determination of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in granting the license must be deemed valid in a subsequent collateral attack on its legality. (Matter of Golden v. Joseph, 307 N. Y. 62 .) … Reuther v. Sisson, 101 Misc. 429 ; Matter of Hoover, 30 F. 51 ; Matter of Barry v. O’ Connell, supra; Matter of Roden v. New York State *1009 Liq.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.