Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.22s

  • People ex rel. Schuster v. Vincent

    73 Misc. 2d 653 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1972

    Schuster v. Herold ( 410 F. 2d 1071 [April 24, 1969], cert. den. 396 U. S. 847 [1969]). By that writ, petitioner challenged the legality of his transfer from Clinton Prison to Dannemora State Hospital. … At the outset, the petitioner read a statement to the board in which he stated, inter alia: ‘ ‘ My conscience would not permit me to accept any sort of parole board supervision.”

    Reversed by People ex rel. Schuster v. Vincent, 42 A.D.2d 596 (1973)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Willett

    35 Barb. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1861

    State Rep. 185;) Bholen v. Cleveland, (5 Mason, 174;) Caskie v. Brown, (2 Wall. jun. 131.) … In Tyler v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Peloquin v. Arsenault

    162 Misc. 2d 306 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1994

    The use of hand-held or other unobtrusive audio tape recorders is settled — they are permitted (Mitchell v Board of Educ., 113 AD2d 924 [1985]). … Hand-held audio recorders are unobtrusive (Mitchell v *309 Board of Educ., supra); camcorders may or may not be depending, as we have seen, on the circumstances.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc. v. Maltbie

    183 Misc. 924 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1944

    If its effect is to restrain a State officer or board, the proceeding can be brought only in the department in which' the officers or board is located. (Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm., 175 App. … R. v. Priest, 169 N. Y. 432 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hawley v. Morton

    23 Barb. 255 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1856

    (See Pool v. Pool, 1 Hill, 580 ; McKillip v. McKillip, 8 Barb. 552 ; 17 id. 410.) … And under such circumstances no demand of board or clothing of the defendant was necessary.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kessel v. D'Amato

    97 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1979

    In addition, this court in Matter of Kamlet v Board of Educ. (91 Mise 2d 1105) concluded that planning sessions wherein oral reports were received from employees of the school system as well as prospective contractors were … In support of their claim of noncompliance by the board with section 305 of the Charter, the petitioners direct the attention of the court to People v Tremaine ( 281 NY 1 ); Matter of Block v Sprague ( 285 NY 69 ); and Matter

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brunacini v. Loomis

    13 Misc. 2d 884 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1958

    Board of Zoning Appeals of Vil. of Hempstead, 198 Misc. 785, 786 ), and for a school (Matter of Concordia Collegiate Inst. v. Miller, 301 N. … Thus, a majority percentage consent was upheld in Rhode Island (Slefkin v. Board of Aldermen of Central Falls, 39 R. I. 525) and Illinois (People ex rel. Goldberg v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barnathan v. Kramer

    44 Misc. 2d 203 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1964

    Moreover, in Hewlett v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Donnellon v. Heffernan

    193 Misc. 97 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1948

    Objections were filed to this petition and after a hearing this court (Matter of Marcantonio v. Heffernan, 192 Misc. 868 , Mr. … The decision in Matter of Schwamm v. Cohen ( 172 Misc. 162 ) has not been overlooked. The decision there referred to a different situation even though there are points of similarity.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Bowen

    12 Abb. N. Cas. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881

    Lorillard v. … Oswold v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Young v. Heffernan

    187 Misc. 604 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1946

    Hotchkiss v. Smith, 206 N. Y. 231, *606 241-242 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re County of Nassau

    207 Misc. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1954

    In People v. … (Bowles v. Ackerman, 4 F. R. D. 260 ; Fleming v. Bernardi, 4 F. R. D. 270.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brooklyn Garden Apartments, Inc.

    169 Misc. 610 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1938

    New York Electric Lines v. Squire, 107 N. Y. 593 ; affd., 145 U. S. 175 ; Morgan’s Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of Health, 118 id. 455; Nicchia v. State of New York, 254 id. 228.) … Co. v. Buffalo Street R. R. Co., 111 N. Y. 132, 140 [1888]; Metropolitan Board of Excise v. Barrie, 34 id. 657.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Christ v. Dodd

    91 Misc. 2d 250 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1977

    After a canvass and recanvass of the votes cast at said election the Board of Elections certified the total vote to be 1774 for D’Agostino and 1765 for petitioner Christ. … Santangelo, 15 AD2d 341 ; Matter of De Martini v Power, 27 NY2d 149 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guariglia v. De Furio

    34 Misc. 2d 200 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1962

    Co. v. … (Lewis v. Smith, 109 Misc. 694 , affd. 190 App. Div. 884 ; Mullooly v. Union Free School Dist. No. 8, 20 Misc 2d 795 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Newman

    100 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1979

    (Matter of Howard v Wyman, 28 NY2d 434 .) However, the agency may not under the guise of administering the statute ascribe a different or unreasonable meaning to its terms. … (Matter *210 of Mounting & Finishing Co. v McGoldrick, 294 NY 104 ; 1 NY Jur, Administrative Law, § 191.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Carter v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

    31 Misc. 3d 430 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2010

    (Matter of Lubin v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 974, 976 [1983]; see Matter of Edwards v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 190 AD2d 545 , 545 [1st Dept 1993], citing Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v City … (Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760 [1996]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Paris v. Eisenberg

    35 Misc. 2d 934 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1962

    association is presently authorized to build and maintain a float or dock, a right which has for some time been the subject of litigation in the courts (Paris v. … The proposed float was a structure (Caddy v. Interborough R. T. Co., 195 N. Y. 415 ). Furthermore, a permit was issued. (3) That petitioner has no standing to bring this proceeding.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sparling v. Patterson

    201 Misc. 737 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1951

    Div. 257 ; Matter of Five-Boro Personal Loan Corp. v. Bell, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 445, affd. 271 App. Div. 1011 ; Matter of Bd. of Educ., School Dist. No. 1 v. Cole, 176 Misc. 509 ; Matter of New Honeymoon Danceland v. … Y. v. Weil, 76 Misc. 273 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McMaster v. Owens

    193 Misc. 284 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1948

    Peixotto v. Board of Education, 212 N. … (Matter of Armitage v. Board of Education of City of Auburn, 122 Misc. 586 , affd. 210 App. Div. 812 , affid. 240 N. Y. 548 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.