Case law

Meyer v. Wiess

47 Misc. 2d 1056 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1965

(Bradford v. County of Suffolk, 257 App. Div. 777, 779-780 .) It is difficult to imagine a situation in which a declaratory judgment is more necessary than is presented in this action. … Board ”.

People v. Graham

192 Misc. 2d 528 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2002

Officer Brown also observed that the windshield of the vehicle was cracked. … (People v LaFontaine, supra at 98 .)

Town of Schroeppel v. Spector

43 Misc. 2d 290 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1963

Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298 [1941]; People ex rel. Ortenberg v. Bales, 224 App. Div. 87 [2d Dept., 1928], affd. 250 N. Y. 598 [1929]; Matter of Multiplex Garages v. Walsh, 241 N. Y. 527 [1925]). … (People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105, 108 [1952]; People v. Kesbec, Inc., 281 N. Y. 785 [1939]; People v. Wolfe, 272 N. Y. 608 [1936].)

Sawyer v. Church

199 Misc. 1002 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1950

Honess 52 Corp. v. Widholt

176 Misc. 2d 57 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1998

Corp. v Anderson, supra; Matter of Twin Lakes Farms Assocs. v Town Clerk of Town of Bedford, 215 AD2d 667 [2d Dept]). … Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 63 NY2d 100, 101-102 ; Matter of Tozzo v Board of Appeals on Zoning, 179 AD2d 810, 811 [2d Dept]; Briedis v Village of Tuxedo Park, 156 AD2d 744, 746 [2d Dept]).

De Salvio v. McMorran

50 Misc. 2d 483 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1965

This action, a companion action to Matter of Helpern v. … Final action on a project such as the Expressway would have been taken by the Board of Estimate, and not by the Mayor alone. (Matter of Porter Flushing Realty Co. v.

Cristenfeld v. Meisser

64 Misc. 2d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1970

Board of Supervisors, 7 A D 2d 538, 544-545, affd. 6 N Y 2d 376). Furthermore, the Court of Appeals in Matter of Mansfield v. … Justice Henry Tasker in Matter of De Luca v.

In re the Arbitration between Associated Teachers of Huntington & Board of Education

60 Misc. 2d 443 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1969

In such circumstances, the question of arbitrability must be submitted to an arbitrator for resolution as indicated by the United States Supreme Court in Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Co. ( 363 U. … Thus, under this section, a Board of Education is free to adopt its own grievance procedure.

People ex rel. McSpedon v. Stout, County Treasurer

4 Abb. Pr. 22 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1856

The audit and allowance by the Board of Supervisors, in cases where they are authorized to act, is final and conclusive as to the amount to be paid (People v. Supervisors of Queens, 1 Hill, 195 ; Same v. … Hie case of Bradley v.

Allied Mutuals Liability Insurance v. Interstate Cork Co.

134 Misc. 504 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1929

The Industrial Board itself is without power to reform the policy as it has no equity powers. (Svolos v. Marsch & Co., 195 App. Div. 675 ; Hamberger v. Wolf e-Smith Co., 215 id. 739 .) … Justice Woodward, in writing the prevailing, opinion in Svolos v. Marsch & Co.

Miracle Mile Associates v. Department of Environmental Conservation

98 Misc. 2d 519 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1979

the board labeled "site plan approval” as, in essence, a special use permit, inapplicable to subdivision (b). … "[T]he law should be construed to effectuate its pur *528 pose” (Young v Toia, 66 AD2d 377, 379 , citing Kokoszka v Belford, 417 US 642, 650 ).

MacMillan v. Morgenthau

146 Misc. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1933

Brown v. O’Brien ( 137 App. … Brown v.

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of Connetquot Central School District No. 7 & Connetquot Teachers Ass'n

74 Misc. 2d 336 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1972

The Board points out that approval at a public hearing was nót obtained, nor did the Board president ever sign the agreement. … (See State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Case No. U-0362 — Matter of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Auth. v.

Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. Mayor of New York

17 Misc. 433 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Corp. 186; Brewis v. City of Duluth, 13. Fed. Repr. 334; see, also, Mobile v. Watson, 116 U. S. 289 ; Cash v. Town of Douglasville, 94 Ga. 557 ; Plunketts Creek Township v. Crawford, 27 Penn. … The case of Morson v.

People ex rel. Weiss v. City of Buffalo

84 N.Y.S. 434 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1901

Coughlin v. Gleason, 121 N. Y. 631 , 25 N. E. 4 . … Easton v. Pickersgill, 55 N. Y. 315 ; Matter W. St. A. & P. R. R. Co., 115 N. Y. 442 , 22 N. E. 356 . It is, however, not controlling. 23 Am. & Eng. Ency. 340, 341.

Sherwood v. Holbrook

98 Misc. 668 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1917

Hubbell v. Henrickson, 175 N. Y. 175 ; Carpenter v. Osborn, 102 id. 552; Gray v. Fuller, 17 App. Div. 29 . … Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 ; Reed v. Stryker, 4 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 26 ; Proctor v. Sidney Sash, Blind & Furniture Co., 8 App. Div. 42 ; Hatch v. Heinze, 172 id. 675. In Brinkerhoff v.

Gebhard v. New York Club

21 Abb. N. Cas. 248 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1888

Then, further, the judgments of the board of direction i» not final. … Under such circumstances the plaintiff might well, a» stated in White v. Brownell, 4 Abb. N.

Union Free School District No. 7 v. Nowicki

57 Misc. 2d 66 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1968

No. 7 v. Allen (29 A D 2d 608, supra) terminating any remaining stay of action by the new Central Board. … (Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 6 v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 7, supra; Gardner v. Ginther, 232 App. Div. 296 [4th Dept., 1931], affd. 257 N. Y. 578 ; Matter of Board of Educ. v.

People ex rel. Walsh v. Teller

169 Misc. 342 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1938

Markham v. Simpson ( 175 N. C. 135 ; 95 S. … Markham v.

Elmwood-Anderson Corp. v. Novello

3 Misc. 3d 858 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2004

(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222 , 230-231 [1974].) … (Id. at 231; see, Heintz v Brown, 80 NY2d 998, 1001 [1992] [court’s scope of review is limited to an assessment of whether there is a rational basis for the administrative determination; arbitrary action is without sound