Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.00s
200 Misc. 112 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1950
*113 provision: “ We do hereby agree to' accept children for board, subject to the rules of the boarding out department of Angel Guardian Home, a copy of which is in our possession.” … Herzog v. Morgan, 287 N.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLazarus v. Yorkview Theater Corp.
74 Misc. 2d 729 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1973
Kingsley Books v. Brown ( 354 U. S. 436 ). … People v. Richmond County News, 9 N Y 2d 578). But it should be noted in Richmond (supra) and in Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCommissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Stevens
25 Misc. 2d 799 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1960
(see Matter of Feiertag v. … As to this aspect of the defendants’ plea, the papers submitted indicate that the case was marked closed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. This determination is final unless set aside in a proper manner (cf. Drier v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTruesdale Lake Property Owners' Ass'n v. Collin
22 Misc. 2d 27 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1959
the building up of unimproved and undeveloped areas ought to be accompanied by provisions for roads and streets and other essential facilities to meet the basic needs *29 of the new residents of the area (Matter of Brous v. … No permit for the erection of any building shall be issued unless ’ ’ and “ Before such permit shall be issued ” (emphasis supplied), and in the light of the unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Brous v.
Cited 1 timesPublished45 Misc. 2d 923 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1965
Similar proceedings were instituted in Matter of Brown v. … On this motion, petitioners contend that the regulations adopted by the Commissioner of Correction do not comply with the court’s mandate in Brown v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Queens Borough Gas & Electric Co. v. Woodbury
67 Misc. 481 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1910
Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. Board of Tax Commissioners. 196 N. … The case of People v. Barker, 139 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished31 Misc. 2d 282 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1961
The cited portion of the Otto v. Steinhilber rule was further developed in Matter of Forrest v. … Malone, 26 Misc 2d 817 ; Matter of Chad Homes v. Board of Appeals, 5 Misc 2d 20 ; Matter of Jam Rick Homes v. Young, 28 Misc 2d 561 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished141 Misc. 319 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1931
That such limitation upon the action of the Board is a proviso and not an exception I believe. (See Rowell v. Janvrin, 151 N. … (Matter of Barker v. Switzer, 209 App. Div. 151, 153 ; City of Utica v. Hanna, 202 id. 610; Matter of Melita v. Nolan, 126 Misc. 345 ; Coley v. Campbell, Id. 869; City of Glens Falls v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMars Associates, Inc. v. Palmer
140 Misc. 2d 1005 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1988
(Matter of Jacobs v Altman, 69 NY2d 733, 735 [1987]; Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 354 [1986].) … (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 579-580 [1975].)
Cited 1 timesPublishedRochester Poster Advertising Co. v. Town of Irondequoit
33 Misc. 2d 1072 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1962
(Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183, 188 , supra; City of Rochester v. West, 164 N. Y. 510, 514 .) … Having held that the action of the Board was a nullity, there is no determination to be reviewed by me. (Matter of Foy v. Schechter, 1 N Y 2d 604, 612.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedTishman Realty & Construction Co. v. Walsh
135 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1929
Werner v. Walsh ( 212 App. Div. 635 ; affd., 240 N. … (See, also, Matter of Goldenberg v. Walsh, 215 App. Div. 396, 401 , dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice McAvor, which was adopted by the Court . of Appeals in reversing the decision of the Appellate Division, 242 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished9 Misc. 2d 995 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1957
Matter of Brook v. … Conversely, it was held in Matter of Corn v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCorbett v. Union Free School District No. 21
199 Misc. 930 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1951
Board of Educ. of the City of Rochester, supra; Judd v. Board *933 of Educ., 278 N. Y. 200 ). … Justice Jaycox in Board of Educ. of School Dist. No. 1, Town of Hempstead v. Harper (191 N. Y. S. 273).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDelaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton Beach
79 Misc. 2d 438 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1974
of Supervisors v. … Enabling enactments provide local planning boards with discretion in dealing with subdivisions provided they act within the bounds of regulations approved by the local governing body (Villa-Laken Corp. v.
Cited 16 timesPublished134 Misc. 882 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1929
Lodes v. Department of Health ( 189 N. Y. 187, 196 ); Hinman v. Clark ( 121 App. Div. 105, 110 ); N. Y. State Investing Co. v. Brady (214 id. 592, 599); Matter of Walker ( 84 Misc. 118 ); Fox v. … The rule of construction is well stated by the court in the case of Salmon v.
Cited 2 timesPublished71 Misc. 2d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1972
(Ricker v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 196 N. Y. S. 2d 17, 21). … Vaccaro v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 54 Misc 2d 206 , supra; Konig v. McCoy, 63 Misc 2d 1038 , revd. N. Y. L.
Cited 12 timesPublished3 Lans. 398 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1871
Canal Board ( 13 Barb., 432 ), and The People v. Brennan ( 39 Barb., 652 ). It is said, in The People v. Contracting Board ( 27 N. … Bullard v. The Contracting Board ( 33 N. Y., 382 ), has been briefly reported.
Cited 3 timesPublished57 Misc. 2d 927 · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 1968
Nechamcus v. Warden, 144 N. Y. 529 ). … (See, also, Acorn Employment Serv. v. Moss, 292 N. Y. 147 , 153: Matter of Concordia Collegiate Inst. v. Miller, 301 N. Y. 189 , 194 — 196; Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46, 52-53 ; Matter of Swalbach v.
Cited 4 timesPublished41 Misc. 2d 850 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1962
The court believes that they set forth sufficiently the reasoning necessary to the decision made by the board. It believes also that the board’s function on this proceeding is as stated by the Court of Appeals. … (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 11 N Y 2d 21, 24; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1383 et seq.)
Cited 3 timesPublished128 Misc. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1926
Rodgers v. Coler ( 166 N. … (Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207 ; Ellis v. United States, 206 U. S. 246 ; People ex rel. Cossey v. Grout, 179 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna