Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.53s
138 Misc. 2d 786 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1988
solely on the prospect of possible violations of law being discovered, especially with respect to subpoenas duces tecum * * * There must be authority, relevancy, and some basis for inquisitorial action” (Matter of A’Hearn v … (Matter of Levin v Murawski, 59 NY2d 35, 40 .) As aforesaid, the enabling statute extends this authority to the patient and office records of the actual licensee under investigation.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMitchell v. Long Island University
62 Misc. 2d 733 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1970
”; (§ V-A) the appeal board had the right “to affirm, to reduce, or to strengthen the penalty”; (§ VT-D) “ The decision of the Faculty-Student Appeal Board shall be final as interpreted under the statutes of the University … That the board was not predisposed to making an adverse finding is not only evidenced by its offer to hear Noah Mitchell and his witnesses but by the final sentence on page 2 of its record “ The Board does recognize that
Cited 5 timesPublished20 N.Y.S. 26 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1892
and are in use by said board and the defendant. … Kramrath v. City of Albany, 127 N. Y. 581 , 28 N. E. Rep. 400.
Cited 5 timesPublished29 Misc. 2d 351 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1961
Roscos V. Elsworth, J. … The court is not impressed with the argument that a member of the police board is powerless to initiate charges and that the board can only act when some outsider prefers charges.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 Misc. 43 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1902
Co., 69 Hun, 324 ; Consolidated Ice Co. v. Mayor, 53 App. *46 Div. 260 ; aff’d. 166 N. Y. 92 ; Langdon v. Mayor, 93 N. Y. 149 ). … Y., at p. 99 ; Smith v. Furbish, 68 N. H. 123).
Cited 0 timesPublished123 Misc. 2d 885 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1984
The application forms are designed by the State Board of Elections and processed by the local county boards of elections. … The Legislature, no doubt aware of the differing local conditions described in Matter of Ahern v Elder ( 195 NY 493 , supra), has directed that the local county boards of elections are the government bodies charged with distributing
Reversed by Clark v. Cuomo, 103 A.D.2d 244 (1984)Cited 5 timesPublished27 Misc. 2d 681 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1960
In granting the special exception, the board exceeded its jurisdiction and power, and the special permit here in question is therefore a nullity. (Kaufman v. City of Glen Cove, 180 Misc. 349 ; Matter of Long Is. R. R. … The jurisdiction of the board to grant a variance is limited to an appeal from an order of the building official denying a building permit or certificate of occupancy (Streeter v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & Holbert
39 Misc. 2d 782 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1962
Corp. v. … Corp. v. Brown (15 A D 2d 578, supra). See, also, order of Supreme Court at Special Term, reinstated by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Rosenbaum (American Sur. Co. of N. Y.), (supra).
Cited 9 timesPublished193 Misc. 97 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1948
Objections were filed to this petition and after a hearing this court (Matter of Marcantonio v. Heffernan, 192 Misc. 868 , Mr. … The decision in Matter of Schwamm v. Cohen ( 172 Misc. 162 ) has not been overlooked. The decision there referred to a different situation even though there are points of similarity.
Cited 5 timesPublished173 Misc. 2d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1997
In Matter of Harden v Board of Elections ( 74 NY2d 796 ), the Court of Appeals explained the opportunity to ballot remedy as follows: "The 'opportunity to ballot’ remedy fashioned in Matter of Hunting v Power ( 20 NY2d 680 … It was not intended to be a generally available substitute for the petition process” (see, Matter of Harden v Board of Elections, 74 NY2d 796, 797 ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedTidewater Oil Co. v. Mangravite
38 Misc. 2d 662 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1963
This is an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order reviewing and annulling a determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Lynbrook wherein a special exception … Here, there is no such permission; the proposed improvement is flatly prohibited. ’ ’ (Matter of Simensky v. Mangravite, 16 A D 2d 977, affd. 12 N Y 2d 908; emphasis supplied.)
Cited 2 timesPublished18 Misc. 2d 91 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1959
(Matter of Wright v. Ransom, 307 N. Y. 317 .) … (Matter of Cutler v. Herman, 2 A D 2d 782, affd. 3 N Y 2d 334; Matter of Wright v. Ransom, supra.)
Cited 3 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Utica Sunday Tribune Co. v. Hugo
93 Misc. 618 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1916
Republican & Journal Co. v. McCarthy, 134 App. Div. 761 ; People ex rel. R. & J. Co. v. Wiggins, 199 N. Y. 382, 384 . The law is very elastic and it leaves a very large discretion to the supervisors. … Elmira Advertiser Assn. v. Gor *625 man, 169 App. Div. 891 ; People ex rel. R. & J. Co. v. Wiggins, 199 N. Y. 382 . The court in the case last cited held that such acts are not properly reviewable by certiorari.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re the Arbitration Between Marcus & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
29 Misc. 2d 573 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1961
Co., 3 A D 2d 564, affd. 4 N Y 2d 1028; Matter of Brown [Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.], 24 Misc 2d 550 ). … By such unwarranted delay, it must be deemed, as a matter of law, that timely notice of petitioner’s claim was not given to respondent (Deso v. London & Lancashire Ind. Co., 3 N Y 2d 127; Zurich Acc. Ins. Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished98 Misc. 2d 972 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1979
(Matter of Kuhn v Curran, 294 NY 207, 217 ; to the same effect Matter of City of New York v Beame, 37 AD2d 89 .) … (Bender v Jamaica Hosp., 40 NY2d 560, 561-562 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished201 Misc. 737 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1951
Div. 257 ; Matter of Five-Boro Personal Loan Corp. v. Bell, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 445, affd. 271 App. Div. 1011 ; Matter of Bd. of Educ., School Dist. No. 1 v. Cole, 176 Misc. 509 ; Matter of New Honeymoon Danceland v. … Y. v. Weil, 76 Misc. 273 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished22 N.Y.S. 279 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1893
Brown was a nephew of Clark. … Lavelle v. Skelly, 24 Hun, 642 , 90 N. Y. 546 ; Piper v. Van Buren, 27 Hun, 384 ; Richards v. Brice, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 3 N. Y. Supp. 941 ; Patterson v. McCunn, 38 Hun, 531 ; Dick v. Livingston, 41 Hun, 455 .
Cited 0 timesPublished193 Misc. 284 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1948
Peixotto v. Board of Education, 212 N. … (Matter of Armitage v. Board of Education of City of Auburn, 122 Misc. 586 , affd. 210 App. Div. 812 , affid. 240 N. Y. 548 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedMatter of Renren Inc. Derivative Litig. v. XXX
New York Supreme Court · May 20, 2020
Brown , 564 US 915, 919 [2011], quoting International Shoe Co. v Washington , 326 US 310, 317 [1945]). … Member (2012 — Present) and Executive Director (2017 — Present) of Trucker Path located in Phoenix, Arizona, an Investor/Board Advisor of Aspiration.com (2014-Present), located in the Greater Los Angeles Area, (v) he was
Cited 0 timesPublishedRogers v. North American Philips Co.
37 Misc. 2d 923 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1962
In Place v. … (Levitt v. Incorporated Vil. of Sands Point, 6 N Y 2d 269; Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown, supra; Thomas v. Town of Bedford, supra.)
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna