Case law

Di Lorenzo v. Heffernan

187 Misc. 766 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1946

The petitioner seeks an order declaring the validity of a nominating petition heretofore filed in the office of the Board of Elections for his nomination as a candidate of the 'Liberal Party for the office of. … Matter of Garside v. Cohen ( 265 N. Y. 606 ), relied upon by petitioner, deals with an entirely different state of facts and has no application to the present issue. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Submit order.

Burke v. O'Connor

53 Misc. 2d 669 · New York Supreme Court · May 11, 1967

Board an opportunity to review its zoning ordinance. … Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298 ; Incorporated Vil. of Brookville v.

Valachovic v. Nyquist

68 Misc. 2d 33 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1971

And the Court of Appeals has stated in Matter of Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Bd. v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259, 267; Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127, 136).

Tompers v. Tompers

159 N.Y.S. 817 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1916

Browning v. Bettis, 8 Paige, 568 ; Valentine v. Williams, 159 N. Y. Supp. 815 . … The case therefore comes within the principle ■of Browning v. Bettis, supra, and the cases there discussed.

Metal Goods & Manufacturers Insurance Trust Fund v. Advent Tool & Mold, Inc.

19 Misc. 3d 608 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 5, 2008

Co. v Northville Indus. Corp., 41 NY2d 455 [1977]; Keith v Houck, 88 AD2d 763 [4th Dept 1982].) … (Nichols v Nichols, 306 NY 490, 496 [1954]; see also Brainard v New York Cent. R.R.

Millard v. Lewis

17 Misc. 2d 698 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1959

(See Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N. Y. 440 ; Valley v. Central School Dist. No. 1, 282 App. Div. 533 ; Bard v. Board of Educ., 140 N. Y. S. 2d 850.) … (See Adonnini v. Village of Mount Morris, 171 Misc. 383 ; Parsons v. Village of Dannemora, 275 App. Div. 738 ; Chesney v. Board of Educ., 2 A D 2d 761; Forsyth v. City of Oswego, 191 N. Y. 41 ; Winter v.

Ziele v. Executors of Campbell

2 Johns. Cas. 382 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1801

Geddis v. Hawk, 10 id. 33. Winslow v. Merrill, 2 Fairf. 127. Brown v. Warram, 3 Har. & J. 572 . Powers v. Spear, 3 N. Hamp. 35. Robinson v. Robinson, 1 Fairf. 240. Robertson v. Smith, 18 Johns. R. 459. Williams v. … M’ Arthur v. Ladd, 5 Ham. 517. Morgan v. Crimm, 1 Monr. 129. M’Call v. Price, 1 M’Cord, 82. Conley v. Good, 1 Breese, 96 . Bradley v. Camp, Kirby, 106, Brown v. Belches, 1 Wash. 9 . Barrett v. Watson, id. 372.

People v. Barnes

101 Misc. 2d 76 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1979

(Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590 , supra; Davis v Mississippi, 394 US 721 .) In all three cases, the investigatory detentions, which were held to be indistinguishable from a formal arrest, led to custodial interrogation. … Wade, 388 US 218, 240 , supra; People v Ballott, supra; People v Brown, 20 NY2d 238 , cert den 390 US 928 ; People v Coleman, supra).

In re the Arbitration between Morris Central School District Board of Education & Morris Education Ass'n

84 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1975

Y. v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. … Again in Board of Educ. of Chautauqua Cent. School Dist. v Chautauqua Cent.

Adolph v. Department of Personnel

71 Misc. 2d 68 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1972

(Matter of Fitzgerald v. Conway, 275 App. Div. 205 ; Matter of Barlow v. President & Comrs. of N. Y. State Dept. of Civ. Serv., 28 A D 2d 1058; Matter of Rosner v. Civil Serv. Comm. of N. Y. State Dept. of Civ. … (Matter of Acosta v. Lang, 13 N Y 2d 1079, 1081.) For the foregoing reasons the petition must be dismissed.

Rice v. Caldwell

201 Misc. 952 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1951

It should be pointed out the plaintiff board is also constituted a body corporate by sections 1804 and 1701. (Schoen v. Board of Educ., Cambridge Central School Dist., 274 App. Div. 682 [3d dept., 1949].) … (Deering v. Reilly, 167 N. Y. 184 [1901].)

Mezey Motors, Inc. v. O'Dwyer

197 Misc. 227 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1949

The action is not, as movant asserts, one to enjoin the board of estimate from exercising a legislative or governmental power, i.e., condemnation of property. … (Blanshard v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 5 .)

In re Crosby

178 Misc. 746 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1942

(People v. Thomas, 33 Barb. 287 ; People ex rel. Shirey v. Pearson, 121 Misc. 26, 29 .) … Nothing decided in Morris v. Cashmore (253 App. Div. 657) is to the contrary.

Romeo v. Union Free School District No. 3

82 Misc. 2d 336 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1975

(People v Price, 262 NY 410 .) That right must be protected by the Trial Judge. (Glasser v United States, 315 US 60 .) … (Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 24 NY2d 174 ; 1 NY Jur, Administrative Law, § 184; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 .)

Milhim v. Clarke

140 Misc. 2d 1092 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1988

In 1988, by way of an article 78 proceeding, the Village was directed to appoint a Police Chief pursuant to statute (see, Matter of Petri v Milhim, 139 AD2d 652 ), and the current dispute arose when the Board exercised the … "[S]uch legislative intent must be first sought in the language of the statute under consideration” (Drelich v Kenlyn Homes, 86 AD2d 648, 649 ).

Pateman v. Marra

138 Misc. 2d 807 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1988

As a separate body, the Planning Board was required to render its own determination of petitioners’ application (Village Law § 7-728 [4]; cf., Matter of Woodhull Assocs. v Board of Trustees, 63 AD2d 677 ). … With respect to respondents’ objection as to form, such objection was not a basis for the Planning Board to withhold its determination (Matter of Di Stefano v Miller, 116 AD2d 575, 576 ; Matter of Wallkill Manor v Coulter

Vanderlip v. Walker

144 Misc. 629 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1932

(See Kane Co. v. Kinney, 174 N. Y. 69 ; Schoenherr v. Van Meter, 215 id. 548, 550; Hildreth Granite Co. v. City of Watervliet, 161 App. Div. 420 ; Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Co., 172 id. 581; Crane Co. v. … As was said in substance in Kane Co. v. Kinney ( 174 N.

Clune v. Walker

10 Misc. 2d 858 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1958

Y. 115 ; Matter of Eaton v. Sweeny, 257 N. Y. 176 ). Further, the ordinance itself must clearly apprise an owner or purchaser of the restrictions to which his property is subject. … Hogan disagreed *861 with the determination of a board of appeals in denying a variance (Matter of Gruen v. Simpson, 153 N. Y. S. 2d 287). This court agrees with the views therein expressed.

Castree v. Slingerland

139 Misc. 632 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1931

The board of supervisors has exclusive authority to fix the salary of the coroners. (County Law, § 191; Matter of MacDonald v. Ordway, 219 N. Y. 328 .) … On a similar state of facts the Supreme Court of California (Rice v. National City, 132 Cal. 354 ) arrived at a like conclusion.

Sawyer v. Church

199 Misc. 1002 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1950