Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.82s

  • Luchowski v. Lawley

    26 Misc. 2d 148 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1960

    (See Matter of Walsh v. Boyle, 179 App. Div. 582, 588 ; Matter of Burr v. Voorhis, 192 App. Div. 909 , affd. 229 N. Y. 382 .) … See, also, Matter of Childs v. Curran, 183 Misc. 195, 198 .) Here, the petitioner fails to prove compliance with the conditions set forth in section 104 of the Election Law (subd. 1).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Casino Productions, Inc. v. Vitaphone Corp.

    163 Misc. 403 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1937

    (Fendler v. Morosco, 253 N. Y. 281 .) … (Sheldon v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Fisher

    98 Misc. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1916

    Rogers v. Bradshaw, 20 Johns. 735 ; C hapman v. Gates, 54 N. Y. 133 , 143; Hamersley v. Mayor, 56 N. Y. 533, 536 . And in People v. Adirondack R. Co., 160 N. … Miller v. Brinkerhoff, 4 Den. 118 ; Staples v. Fairchild, 3 N. Y. 41, 46 ; Sheldon v. Wright, 5 id. 497; Skinnion v. Kelley, 18 id. 355; Potter v. Ogden, 136 id. 384, 396; Lamp Chimney Co. v. Brass & Copper Co., 91 U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Durkin

    195 Misc. 1040 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1949

    (Matter of Mahon v. Board of Education, 171 N. Y. 263, 266-267 .) In Porter v. Fletcher ( 153 App. Div. 470,472 , affd. 211 N. … Before we can have an extra or additional compensation there must be an amount fixed by contract or by law (Matter of Mahon v. Board of Education, supra).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Valachovic v. Nyquist

    68 Misc. 2d 33 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1971

    And the Court of Appeals has stated in Matter of Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Bd. v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259, 267; Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127, 136).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hyde & Everit v. Cookson

    21 Barb. 92 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1855

    Bronson, delivered in Mallory v. Willis, (4 Comst. 76,) and recognized and approved in Foster v. … (Brown v. Sax, 7 Cowen, 95. Baker v. Wheeler, 8 Wend. 505 . Rightmyer v. Raymond, 12 id. 51. Martin v. Porter 5 Mees. & Welsh. 352. Wild v. Hold, 9 id. 672.) In Pierce v. Schenck, ( 3 Hill, 28,) Mr.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bonesteel v. Garlinghouse

    60 Barb. 338 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1871

    (Powers v. Wilson, 7 Cowen 274. Lathrop v. Briggs, 8 id. 171. Ransom v. Keyes, 9 id. 128. Poucher v. Holley, 3 Wend. 184 . Kasson v. People ex rel. Rease, 44 Barb. 347 .) … In Clark v. Clement, (6 T.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Park West Village Associates v. Abrams

    127 Misc. 2d 372 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1984

    Co. v Board of Supervisors ( 16 NY 424 ), set forth the applicable rules. … (Dash v. Van Kleeck, 7 John., 447 ; Ogden v. Blackledge, 2 Cranch, 272 .)” (Pp 431-432.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Town of Cheektowaga v. Levitt

    22 Misc. 2d 163 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1960

    (Matter of City of Rochester v. Annis, 185 Misc. *165 518 ; Matter of Island Trees Civic Assn. v. Town Bd. of Hempstead, 198 Misc. 1064 . Cf., also, Matter of Layman v. Persons, 133 Misc. 661 and Matter of Larson v. … (Matter of Hagan v. Picard, 171 Misc. 475 , affd. 258 App. Div. 771 ; Matter of Western New York Water Co. v. Public Service Comm., 124 N. Y. S. 2d 612, 615.) Motion to dismiss petition granted. Submit order.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Crosby

    178 Misc. 746 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1942

    (People v. Thomas, 33 Barb. 287 ; People ex rel. Shirey v. Pearson, 121 Misc. 26, 29 .) … Nothing decided in Morris v. Cashmore (253 App. Div. 657) is to the contrary.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Powott Corp. v. Woodworth

    172 Misc. 791 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939

    Co. v. Woodbury, 133 App. Div. 503 ; affd., 201 N. Y. 532 .) No application to the board of assessment review having been made or required, it was unnecessary to join the board as a party. … Co., v. Board of Commrs. (supra). The provision was not re-enacted that a board or body could not be joined in its associate or official name unless an action would he against it.

    Reversed on other grounds by People ex rel. Powott Corp. v. Woodworth, 260 A.D. 168 (1940)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McDaniel v. 162 Columbia Heights Housing Corp.

    23 Misc. 3d 784 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2009

    (Matter of Jacobson v Moskowitz, 27 NY2d 67 [1970]; Matter of Coplan v Lionel Corp., 20 AD2d 301, 304 [1st Dept 1964], affd 14 NY2d 679 [1964]; Avien, Inc. v Weiss, 50 Misc 2d 127, 132-133 [Sup Ct, Queens County 1966]; see … also Matter of Gearing v Kelly, 15 AD2d 219 [1st Dept 1961], affd 11 NY2d 201 [1962].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • WHCS Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. 33 Greenwich Owners Corp.

    168 Misc. 2d 721 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1996

    Co. v 181 E. 73rd Tenants Corp., 954 F2d 45). … Such control has been found not to terminate until the tenants elected an inde *726 pendent Board of Directors (2 Tudor City Place Assocs. v 2 Tudor City Tenants Corp., supra).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Farrigan v. Helsby

    68 Misc. 2d 952 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1971

    (Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners, 274 N. Y. 367 .) … (Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 3 v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, 36 A D 2d 753.)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shields v. Martin

    21 Misc. 2d 1023 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1960

    The board’s determination of the 1955 application is determinative of this application unless there has been a change of circumstances. (Matter of Caper v. Parker, 271 App. Div. 839 .) … Whether there has been a sufficient change to give the board power to consider a new application is primarily for the determination of the board in the first instance (Ellsworth Realty Co. v. Kramer, 268 App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Arbitration between United Steelworkers of America & Lennox Furnace Co.

    206 Misc. 193 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1954

    (Matter of New York State Labor Relations Bd. v. Wags Transp. System, N. Y. L. J. March 26, 1954, p. 1, col. 7; Capital Service v. National Labor Relations Bd., 347 U. S. 501 , supra; Amalgamated Workers v. … S. 261 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union, 194 F. 2d 698 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v. Walt Disney Productions, 146 F. 2d 44 , certiorari denied 324 U. S. 877 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Conlon v. Murphy

    44 Misc. 2d 504 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1964

    be accomplished only by resolution of the Board of Trustees (Matter of McMeekan v. … At best the mandatory language “shall retire * * * forthwith ”, did not effect a retirement until the Board of Trustees acted. In Matter of Keevan v. Valentine ( 291 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rodman v. Lofaso

    23 Misc. 2d 337 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1960

    Nor is the holding of Leone v. … The board had the power to employ counsel (Matter of Fleischmann v. Graves, 235 N. Y. 84 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Foss v. McLean

    1 Misc. 3d 783 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2003

    It is patently clear to this court that all power concerning the election of fire district officers vests with the sitting fire district board based upon their power to appoint those in charge of the election. … The board of fire commissioners shall designate a resident fire district elector, who shall be a registered voter of the town, to act as chairman of any election of said district and shall designate not less than two nor

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sands v. Sparling

    31 N.Y.S. 251 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1894

    Burley v. Barnhard, 9 N. Y. St. Rep. 587; Porter v. Dunn (N. Y. App.) 30 N. E. 122 . It is further urged by the defendants that the court erred in receiving testimony as to the value of the board furnished the deceased. … Doubtless, the more proper way to have shown the value of the board would have been to have proposed a hypothetical question, in which the board furnished was described as •sworn by the witness. Reynolds v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.