Case law

Lidakis v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

27 Misc. 3d 1150 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2010

New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760 [1996]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … (See Morley v Arricale, 66 NY2d 665 [1985]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354 [1979]; Pell at 230-232.)

Roosevelt Field, Inc. v. Town of North Hempstead

197 Misc. 621 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1949

(Matter of Reed v. Board of Standard & Appeals, 255 N. Y. 126 ; Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, supra; Holy Sepulchre Cemetery v. Town of Greece, 191 Misc. 241, 247 , affd. 273 App. Div. 942 ; Matter of Olp v. … Div. 944 ; Hilton v. Board of Appeals of City of Geneva, 18 N. Y. S. 2d 213.)

People v. Williams

123 Misc. 2d 165 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1984

(Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161, 169 ; see, also, People v Fletcher, 113 MisC 2d 5, 15; People v Lennon, 80 AD2d 672 .) … (See Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161 , supra; Waller v Florida, 397 US 387 .) Unless two separate sovereignties are involved, the defendant may not be twice prosecuted.

People ex rel. Bailey v. Supervisors of Greene

12 Barb. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1851

That board met on the Tuesday following the election, and organized according to law. … (The People v. Stevens, 5 Hill, 631 , n. a, per Kent, C. Judge.) The motion for a peremptory mandamus must therefore be denied. Harris, Parker and Wright, Justices.]

Etter v. Littwitz

47 Misc. 2d 473 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1965

(Matter of Vetere v. Mitchell, 21 A D 2d 561, affd. sub nom. Matter of Vetere v. Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259.) … (Park Terrace Caterers v. McDonough, 9 A D 2d 113; Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. Davis, 225 App. Div. 182 ; Maxwell Co. v. Cusack Co., 200 App. Div. 610 .)

Johnson v. Moore

28 Misc. 2d 7 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1960

Land Research Bur. v. Young ( 7 Misc 2d 469 ) is an authority in point. … (See, also, Matter of Peters & Whalen v. Schnetser, 194 N. Y. S. 2d 333.) *12 I therefore find the refusal of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant a variance was. .arbitrary and unreasonable.

Benson v. Governor's Office of Employee Relations

195 Misc. 2d 156 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2003

(Heintz v Brown, 80 NY2d 998 [1992].) … In determining if such action has been taken, the court’s role is limited; it may not disturb factual determinations (Heintz, 80 NY2d at 1000 ), nor weigh the evidence (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School

Connelly v. Commissioners of Almshouse

32 Misc. 489 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1900

The case of Bell v. City of New York, 46 App. Div. 195 , does not in terms *492 or in fact overrule Abrams v. Horton. … It is not necessary for me to hold in this case that the plaintiff could have been dismissed at any time by the board who employed him prior to its reorganization. The case of Abrams-v.

Winter v. Bernstein

149 Misc. 2d 1017 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1991

(See, Gordon v Elliman, 306 NY 456, 459 [1954]; United States Trust Co. v Heye, 224 NY 242 [1918]; Kranich v Bach, supra; Nauss v Nauss Bros. … (See, Gordon v Elliman, supra; Bender v Ferro, 86 AD2d 12 [1st Dept 1982].)

Warner v. Erie Railway

49 Barb. 558 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1867

Frazier v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 38 Penn. R. 104. Snow v. Housatonic Railroad Co., 8 Allen, 441 .) 3d. … (Noryed v. Smith, 28 Verm. R. 59. Patterson v. Wallace, 28 Eng. Law and Eq. 48-51. 1 Redf. 522 . Marshall v. Stewart, 33 Eng. Law and Eq. 1.)

Mugavin v. Nyquist

78 Misc. 2d 914 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1974

(Matter of Gunthorpe v. Board of Educ., Union Free School Dist. No. 5, Town of Babylon, 41 Misc 2d 757, 758 .) … School Dist. v. Chautauqua Cent. School Teachers Assn., 41 A D 2d 47, 53). tJpon the instant facts, the court knows of no appellate ruling directly in point (cf. Matter of Board of Educ. of City of Albany v.

Delaney v. Conway

39 Misc. 2d 499 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1963

Co. v. Alabama, 128 U. S. 96 ; Chicago Rock Is. & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 219 U. S. 453 ; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 240 U. S. 518 ; Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Norwood, 283 U. … S. 249 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U. S. 761 , 782; Erie R. R. Co. v. Williams, 233 U. S. 685 ).

Bernstein v. Strammiello

202 Misc. 823 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1952

From the time of his injury on October 31, 1950, until sometime in December, 1951, the family subsisted on the $32 weekly award made to plaintiff by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … Where the court found that the plaintiff was on home relief since the accident but that he was employable and his indigence only temporary (Brown v. Gelat, N. Y. L.

People ex rel. Campbell v. Hannan

10 N.Y.S. 71 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1890

The board thereupon'found the charges to be true, and dismissed him from office. … The board of police commissioners was a court for the trial of the relator. People v. Mayor, etc., 19 Hun, 449 ; People v. Van Allen, 55 N. Y. 31 ; People v. Commissioners, 72 N.

In re Barrett

121 Misc. 735 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1923

Brink v. Way, 179 N. … Smith v. Board of Canvassers, 92 Misc. Rep. 607 . They involve matters within the powers and duties of the board of county canvassers as defined by the Election Law.

Hull v. Peters

7 Barb. 331 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1849

(Hanmer v. Wilsey, 17 Wend. 91 . Retan v. Drew, 19 Id. 304. Johnson v. Comstock, 6 Hill, 10 . Brown v. Ferguson, 2 Denio, 196 .) … The point before us was not there presented, although the court took occasion to reassert the doctrine of Retan v. Drew. In Brown v.

Lowell v. Browner

47 Misc. 2d 729 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1965

the authorities (General Municipal Law, § 239-d; Matter of New York Post Corp. v. … Moses, 12 A D 2d 243, 250, revd. on other grounds 10 N Y 2d 199; Macrum v. Hawkins, 261 N. Y. 193, 200 ).

Ex Parte J. B. Elmendorf v. Mayor of New-York

25 Wend. 693 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1841

The board of assistants adopted resolutions granting the appli-i cations ; but the resolutions were never acted upon by the board of aider-men. … Even fractions of a day may be regarded; and by common usage, the old board may go out at noon of the tenth, and the new board be then qualified.

Magde v. Crowley

200 Misc. 109 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1951

(General City Law, § 82; Matter of Hopkins v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 178 Misc. 186 .) … Sullivan v. McLaughlin, 266 N. Y. 519 ; Matter of Levy v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y., 267 N. Y. 347 ; Matter of Burlinson v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Yonkers, 275 App. Div. 723 .)

Van Buskirk v. Bleiler

77 Misc. 2d 273 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1974

Defendants maintain that the plaintiffs have failed to state a cause of action for a Board of Education is a corporate body which can only act as a unit and not as individuals *274 (Herman v. Board of Educ., 234 N. … Y. 196 ) and therefore the defendants cannot be held personally liable (Bassett v. Fish, 75 N. Y. 303 ; Johnson v. Board of Educ., 210 App. Div. 723 ).