Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Guazzo v. Chave

    59 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1969

    The authorities cited by the Town Board .of Zoning Appeals are entirely persuasive, namely Matter of Taylor v. Kramer (supra); Land Purchasing Corp. of Amer. v. Schlimm (supra); Matter of Perdel Homes v. Barnett (N. Y. … Baybutt, 29 A D 2d 486; Matter of Jonas v. Board of Std. & Apps. of City of New Rochelle, 3 A D 2d 668; Matter of Davison v. Segur, 24 A D 2d 797).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Koukly v. Canavan

    154 Misc. 343 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1935

    (United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 ; Polin v. Kaplan, 257 N. Y. 277 ; Bossert v. Dhuy, 221 id. 342 ; Wilcox v. Royal Arcanum, 210 id. 370 ; Burt v. Oneida Community, 137 id. 346 ; Mathews v. … Meads v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bentrovato v. Crinnion

    206 Misc. 648 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1954

    Taxpayers v. Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N. Y., N. Y. L. … People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105 ; Radano v. Town of Huntington, 305 N. Y. 911 ; Matter of Pelham View Apts. v. Switzer, 130 Misc. 545 ; City of Buffalo v. Chadeayne, 134 N. Y. 163 ; Matter of Ageloff v. Young, 282 App.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Mayor v. Tenth National Bank

    16 N.Y. St. Rep. 273 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1888

    Town of Guilford v. Supervisors, etc., 13 N. Y., 143 ; Brewster v. Syracuse, 19 id. 116; People v. Mitchell, 35 id. 551; Brown v. Mayor, 63 id. 239, 244; Darlington v. … People ex rel Tenth National Bank v. Board of Apportionment 64 N. Y., 627 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Conzo

    169 Misc. 268 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1938

    (Brown v. Brown, 91 Misc. 220 ; Bergstrom v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co., 171 App. Div. 776 .) … In Miller v. Campbell ( 173 App.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Romig v. Weld

    194 Misc. 783 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1949

    Bank v. Zoning Appeals Board, supra; Olp v. Town of Brighton, 173 Misc. 1079 , affd. 262 App. Div. 944 ). … (See Holy Sepulchre Cemetery v. Town of Greece, 273 App. Div. 942 , especially opinion by Gilbert, J. [ 191 Misc. 241 ] ; Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 263 App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • de Agostina v. Parkshire Ridge Amusements, Inc.

    155 Misc. 518 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1935

    As was said by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. Maryland ( 12 Wheat. 419, 439 ; 6 L. Ed. 678 ): “ Questions of power do not depend on the degree to which it may be exercised. … In Darweger v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • International Railway Co. v. Boland

    169 Misc. 926 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1939

    Gilson v. Gibbons, 231 N. Y. 171, at p. 177 .) The application of that principle of law would require, without further argument, a reversal of the decision of the board in this case. … (Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. —, at p. 22.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Reich v. Bosco

    21 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1959

    Y. 59, 62 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Elections, 196 Misc. 109 .) … (See Election Law, §§ 272-276; Matter of Ingamells v. Board of Elections, 259 App. Div. 36, 41 . See, also, Matter of Ginsberg v. Heffernan, 186 Misc. 1029,1034 ; Matter of Mazzotti v. Sewezey, 199 Misc. 987 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Burning

    137 Misc. 173 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1930

    proceedings were taken by the defendant by way of mandamus to compel the superintendent of buildings to cancel his revocation of the permit, which motion was denied, and the denial affirmed by the Appellate Division (Redden v. … The petitioner refers, as the authority that section 24(a) is ehminated from the zoning resolution, to Matter of Fox Lane Corporation v. Mann (216 App. Biv. 813) and Fox Lane Corporation v. Moore (Id. 813; affd., 243 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. Walker

    39 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1902

    Williams v. Merle, 11 Wend. 80 ; Ely v. Ehle, 3 N. Y. 509 ; Everett v. Coffin, 6 Wend. 603 ; Everett v. Saltus, 15 id. 474, and same case on error, 20 id. 269. … Wyckoff v. Southern Hotel Co., 24 Mo. App. 382 ; McClain v. Williams, 11 S. Dak. 227.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Union Wine Co. v. Green

    62 Misc. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1909

    Brown and Otto W. Brown, doing business under the style and name of Union Wine Company.” … Demurrer sustained, with leave to plaintiff to amend v/ithin twenty days, with costs to defendant to abide event.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Ward

    74 Misc. 2d 50 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1973

    In so finding it specifically rejected the holding of Schantz v. Rachlin (supra), and followed instead the Ohio court, which in Samsa v. … In Town of Harvard v. Maxant (supra, p. 351 ) the court quotes a discussion which is contained in the case of Lawrence v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Syracuse Television, Inc. v. Channel 9, Syracuse, Inc.

    51 Misc. 2d 188 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1966

    The failure to sue must be the result of a breach of duty on the part of the board of directors, not merely an error of judgment. (Koral v. Savory, Inc., supra; J. C. F. Holding Corp. v. General Gas & Elec. … The refusal may be implied by the actions of the board. (Kavanaugh v. Commonwealth Trust Co., 45 Misc. 295 , affd. 103 App. Div. 95 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Savacool v. Boughton

    5 Wend. 170 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1830

    The cases of Smilh v. Shaw, 12 Johns. R. 257, and Suydam & Wyckoff v. … I find still greater difficulty in reconciling the case of Suydam & Wickoff v. Keys with that of Beach v. Furman, 9 Johns. R. 229.

    Cited 132 timesPublished
  • McMillan v. Notre Dame Residence Club, Inc.

    33 Misc. 2d 948 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1962

    This case is to be distinguished from Baker v. … Field, supra; Baker v. Matthews, supra).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Meisser

    31 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1961

    Law provides the sole remedy in a situation such as this or whether petitioner’s signature to the Evans-Ewald petition estops hi in from making his present application, the court holds that the *330 determination of the Board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schesch v. State

    65 Misc. 2d 44 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1970

    Where the reason for the relocation was for the purpose of obtaining Federal highway funds, such was held to be consistent with and in fulfillment of the purpose of section 85 of the Highway Law (Matter of Brown v. … The concurring opinion in Matter of Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hyatt v. Taylor

    51 Barb. 632 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1868

    The People v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 John. 357 -394. Stone v. The Mayor of New York, 25 Wend. 157 , 177, and following. James v. Patten, 2 Seld. 10. Post v. President. Utica Bank, 7 Hill, 407 , 408. Waller v. … McClaskey v. Cromwell, 1 Kern. 601. People v. Cowles, 3 id. 360.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Parrish v. Moss

    200 Misc. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1951

    Peixotto v. Board of Education ( 212 N. … law. ’ ’ So, also, in Matter of Shapiro v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.