Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.38s

  • 40th St. & Park Ave., Inc. v. Walker

    133 Misc. 907 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1929

    (Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 222 App. Div. 19 ; affd., 247 N. Y. 599 .) … (Record on appeal in 40th St. & Park Ave., Inc., v. Fox, 222 App. Div. 667 , and 248 N. Y. 527 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Limerick v. Fitzgerald

    29 Misc. 2d 185 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1961

    (Del Ra v. Vaughan, 2 A D 2d 156; Wilhelm v. Abel, 1 A D 2d 55; Matter of Rakov v. Gingold, 23 Misc 2d 725 ; People ex rel. Glasier v. Glasier, 1 Misc 2d 650 ; Hackett v. Reed, 207 Misc. 311 , affd. 285 App. … (Myers v. New York Gent. R. R. Co., 277 App. Div. 745 .) The cross motion is denied. (Matter of Bell Aircraft Corp. v. Board of Assessors of City of Buffalo, 204 Misc. 951 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Press Publishing Co. v. Martin

    25 N.Y.S. 775 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1893

    In the case of People v. … So, in the case of People v. Common Council of Troy, 78 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Shirey v. Pearson

    121 Misc. 26 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1923

    People v. Keeler, 17 N. Y. 370 ; Matter of Mitchell v. Prendergast, 178 App. Div. 690 ; affd., 222 N. Y. 543 . … People v. Keeler, supra. Therefore, the town board, after the election of Shirey, had no power to fill the vacancy caused by the death of McGarr.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bergerman v. Lindsay

    58 Misc. 2d 1013 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1969

    Board of Supervisors of Erie County, 27 A D 2d 902; Glessing v. State of New York, 27 A D 2d 977; see, also, Saratogian, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of County of Saratoga, 20 N Y 2d 244; Augostini v. … Board of Educ., 387 U. S. 105 ; Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Klaess

    192 Misc. 939 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1948

    Our own Appellate Division cited Matter of Olp v. Town of Brighton {supra) with approval in Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards & Appeals ( 263 App. Div. 352, 361 , revd. on other than constitutional grounds 290 N. … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N. Y. 484 ; Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 255 N. Y. 126, 135 ; Hilton v. Board of Appeals of City of Geneva, 18 N. Y. S. 2d 213, 217.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Johnson

    105 Misc. 2d 561 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1980

    The eroding effect of Simmons upon the “automatic standing” rule was recognized in Brown v United States ( 411 US 223 ). … (Brown v United States, supra, at p 229.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Elkind v. Rosenblum

    184 Misc. 916 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1945

    Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 N. Y. 125 ; Matter of Fuhrmann v. Graves, 235 N. Y. 77 ; Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170 .) … Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 N. Y. 125 , supra; Lewis v. Bd. of Education of City of New York, 258 N. Y. 117 .)

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Stepski v. Harford

    174 Misc. 1082 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1940

    Nechamcus v. Warden ( 144 N. Y. 529 ). … The Nechamcus case was followed in Matter of Chapin v. Hogan ( 208 App. Div. 56 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Frances Rose Homes, Inc. v. Commerdinger

    44 Misc. 2d 985 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1964

    Due service of process must be made within 30 days in order to obtain a review of the determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals. (See Tarrant v. Village of Roslyn, 10 A D 2d 37, affd. no opinion 8 N Y 2d 1129.) … (Gandolfo v. Village of Ossining, 4 A D 2d 762.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Feldman v. Nassau Shores Estates, Inc.

    12 Misc. 2d 607 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1958

    Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N. Y. 222, 232 .) … Where such is the situation a variance may be granted to one who purchases property with knowledge of the restrictions (Matter of 293 North Broadway Corp. v. Lange, 282 App. Div. 1056 ; Matter of Stadden v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Winston v. Mangan

    72 Misc. 2d 280 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1972

    (Holton v. Board of Supervisors of County of Monroe, 245 App. Div. 144, 145 ; Hansen v. Ludera, 67 Misc 2d 574, 578 ; Matter of C. Van Deusen, Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 47 Misc 2d 1094, 1096 .) … (See Kandell v. Tocher, 22 A D 2d 513, 515; Finegold v. Lewis, 22 A D 2d 447; Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, 51 Misc 2d 456 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. Hanna

    135 Misc. 750 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1930

    (Admiral Realty Co. v. City of New York, 206 N. Y. 110, 125 ; Talcott v. City of Buffalo, 125 id. 280, 288; Campbell v. City of New York , 244 id. 317, 328.) … Coughlin v. Gleason, 121 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Umpierre

    37 Misc. 3d 775 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2012

    They cite People v Brown ( 13 NY3d 332 [2009]) 6 as supporting that position. … Brown is distinguishable from the *781 present case because the Court of Appeals weighs heavily the factor that the scientific report in Brown arose from a non-law enforcement source.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guerico v. Gerosa

    12 Misc. 2d 595 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1958

    In the meantime, *597 in May, 1952, the Court of Appeals (Matter of Corrigan v. Joseph, 304 N. … (Matter of Heaney v. McGoldrick, 286 N. Y. 38, 44 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Boynton

    25 N.Y.S. 60 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1893

    Board of Education v. Fonda, 77 N. Y. 350 . … Town of Duanesburgh v. Jenkins, 57 N. Y. 177 ; Williams v. Town of Duanesburgh, 66 N. Y. 129 ; Tifft v. City of Buffalo, 82 N. Y. 204 ; Ensign v. Barse, 107 N. Y. 329 , 14 N. E. Rep. 400, and 15 N. E. Rep. 401.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weinstein v. Nicosia

    32 Misc. 2d 246 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1962

    An immediate appeal was taken to the respondent board. On September 1, 1961, the board noticed a hearing of the appeal for September 13,1961. … The board did not abuse its discretion and did not act arbitrarily according to this record. (Burlinson v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 275 App. Div. 723 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Limitone v. Galgano

    21 Misc. 2d 376 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1959

    The answer and accompanying affidavit of the respondent board indicate that after investigation made by the board, they had received reports that petitioners had not rendered satisfactory service in connection with a garbage … The general presumption is that public officials, as well as boards, act honestly and in accordance with law (Matter of Magnotta v. Gerlach, 301 N. Y. 143, 149 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bingham Operating Corp. v. Eyrich

    186 Misc. 434 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1945

    The relator offered in evidence a certificate of the Board of Supervisors showing that the board had fixed the equalization rate for the City of Utica at 65% of the true value. … In Scott v. Empire State Degree of Honor ( 204 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kwiatkowski v. Ithaca College

    82 Misc. 2d 43 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1975

    An appeal was taken and the appeal board upheld the hearing board’s decision. … Petitioner was not accorded those rights for respondent refused to allow petitioner or his representative to appear before the appeal board. (Matter of Ryan v Hofstra Univ., 67 Misc 2d 651, 672 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.