Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.81s

  • People v. Osbourne

    28 Misc. 3d 935 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2010

    (People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005].) … (People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 472 [2008].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Waldorf v. Coffey

    5 Misc. 2d 80 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1957

    Land Research Bur. v. Young (N. Y. L. J., Jan. 15, 1957, p. 13, col. 3), that such a taking carries with it the obligation to compensate the owner for his loss. … Co. v. Thatcher ( 278 N.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Madden v. Barr

    143 Misc. 716 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1932

    Newton v. Twombly, 228 N. Y. 33 ).” (People ex rel. Cecere v. Jennings, supra.) … (People v. Burns, supra.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • 40th St. & Park Ave., Inc. v. Walker

    133 Misc. 907 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1929

    (Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 222 App. Div. 19 ; affd., 247 N. Y. 599 .) … (Record on appeal in 40th St. & Park Ave., Inc., v. Fox, 222 App. Div. 667 , and 248 N. Y. 527 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Corsall v. Gover

    10 Misc. 2d 664 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1958

    Hoefle v. Cahill ( 188 N. … He is an employee of the board. His employment is contractual. He is subject to such reasonable regulations as the board may adopt. (People ex rel. Patterson v. Board of Educ. of City of Syracuse, 269 App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Webb v. Milliken

    66 Misc. 192 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1910

    In Matter of Peters v. Adam, 50 Misc. Rep. 29 , this court has determined the second objection; and that case was affirmed by the Appellate Division, fourth department, in 122 App. Div. 898 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of West Turin v. Moore

    10 Misc. 2d 683 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1958

    (Matter of Marburg v. Cole, 286 N. Y. 202 ; Matter of Simone v. Conway, 284 App. Div. 95 , affd. 308 N. Y. 692 ; Matter of Cavanagh v. Watson, 201 Misc. 899 , affd. 280 App. … (Matter of Leary v. Hurd, 203 Misc. 826 , affd. 284 App. Div. 1086 ; Matter of Simone v. Conway, supra; Matter of Buck v. Hurd, supra.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Cordero v. Thomas

    69 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1972

    v. … Silbert v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gustin v. Joiner

    95 Misc. 2d 277 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1978

    The court has read the cases recited by respondents in support of this contention, namely (Matter of Bokhair v Board of Educ., 43 NY2d 855 ; Matter of Raffone v Pearsall, 39 AD2d 208 ; Duke & Benedict v Board of Educ., 81 … (Meliti v Board of Educ., 92 Misc 2d 473 , affd 64 AD2d 631 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Klaess

    192 Misc. 939 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1948

    Our own Appellate Division cited Matter of Olp v. Town of Brighton {supra) with approval in Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards & Appeals ( 263 App. Div. 352, 361 , revd. on other than constitutional grounds 290 N. … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N. Y. 484 ; Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 255 N. Y. 126, 135 ; Hilton v. Board of Appeals of City of Geneva, 18 N. Y. S. 2d 213, 217.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stateline Plaza, Inc. v. Lehrecke

    87 Misc. 2d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1976

    Nemeroff Realty Corp. v Kerr, 38 AD2d 437 , affd 32 NY2d 873 ). … Co. v Delany, 28 NY2d 449, 458 ). Respondents’ counterclaim shall be dismissed since section 272 of the Town Law does not authorize recoupment of expenses from an applicant other than through a fixed filing . fee.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens' Ctr., Inc. v. Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc.

    New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2016

    V. … Next, in Keogh v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lake Secor Development Co. v. Ruge

    141 Misc. 913 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1931

    (Village of Lynbrook v. Cadoo, 252 N. Y. 308, 314 .) … It has been held that the installation of sewers as a condition of approval by the city commission of a plat is valid (Allen v. Stockwell, 210 Mich. 488 ; 178 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. King

    18 Barb. 277 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1854

    (Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Maine Rep. 9 . Shaw v. Crawford, 10 John. 236 . Browne v. Scofield, 8 Barb. 239 . People v. Canal App. 13 Wend. 371 . Munson v. Hungerford, 6 Barb. 269 .) … (Shaw v. Crawford, supra. Brown *288 v. Chadbourne, supra. Mayor of Colchester v. Brooke, 7 Q. B. Rep. 339, 374.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Washington County Cease, Inc. v. Persico

    120 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1983

    In Valvo v Urban Dev. … Pérsico is stricken and the Board determination invalidated for failure to have the required minimum of five qualified and competent Board members approve the Certificate. V.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McFarland v. Wheeler

    26 Wend. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1841

    Gladstone v. Burlay, 2 Mer. R. 404. … Finally, our supreme court, in Schmidt v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Berlin Iron Bridge Co. v. Wagner

    10 N.Y.S. 840 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1890

    Mather v. Crawford, 36 Barb. 564 ; Huggans v. Riley, 4 N. Y. Supp. 282 ; People v. Meach, 14 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 429. … Gubna, 10 Hun, 11 , was held under Authority conferred by the board of supervisors. The case of Barker v. Town of Oswegatchie, ante, 834, (decided by the special term,) arose under the facts in this case.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Brasier

    169 Misc. 2d 337 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1996

    (People v Recor, 209 AD2d 831 [3d Dept 1994] [discussing violation of probation hearings].) … (People v Ross, supra, at 311-312 .) Consequently, the Board’s recommendations should be reviewed only for arbitrariness and capriciousness and otherwise should be upheld. (People v Ross, supra.)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Family Consultation Service of Eastchester, Inc. v. Howard

    14 Misc. 2d 194 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1958

    Y. 46 ; Matter of Scudder v. O’Connell, 272 App. Div. 251 ; Matter of Elite Dairy Prods. v. Ten Eyck, 271 N. … The issuance of a special exception permit is a duty imposed upon a Board of Appeals provided, of course, that the proposed use meets with all the standards provided in the ordinance (see Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warnock & Zahrndt, Inc. v. Wray

    132 Misc. 882 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1928

    (Gage v. City of New York, 110 App. Div. 403, 410 .) … (McCord v. Lauterbach, 91 App. Div. 315 ; Boyle v. Grant, 12 N. Y. Supp. 801 .) The interests of the city are the paramount consideration and the personnel of the bidders should be entirely subordinated thereto.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.