Case law

People ex rel. Beinert v. Miller

100 Misc. 318 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1917

If the board of estimate had such a power to be exercised or not in its discretion, it could not delegate such discretion to a subordinate administrative or ministerial board. Birdsall v. Clark, 73 N. Y. 73 ; Phelp s v. … City of New York, 112 id. 216, 220 ; Ontario Knitting Co. v. State, 205 id. 409, 416.

O'Hara v. Henderson

74 Misc. 2d 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1973

The court has no power to reconsider the minimum term which it has fixed, provided it has imposed a legal sentence (Matter of Lyons v. Robinson, 293 N. Y. 191,196 ). … (Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 31 .) ” Accordingly, the relief sought is denied and judgment is directed dismissing the proceeding (CPLR art. 78) on the merits.

Amelius v. Grand Imperial LLC

57 Misc. 3d 835 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2017

Transp. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 253 AD2d 330, 337 [1st Dept 1999], lvs denied 93 NY2d 808 [1999]; Matter of Kenton Assoc. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 225 AD2d 349, 350 [1st Dept 1996].) E. … A. v Brown, 564 US 915, 925 [2011].)

Peckham Industries, Inc. v. Ross

61 Misc. 2d 616 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1970

Yacht Club v. Board of Appeals, 32 Misc 2d 677 ). The first condition requires that petitioner improve an existing road known as Burdick Ro.ad running from the quarry site to Route 311. … While the planning board is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance to regulate the location, height and bulk of buildings, there is no provision for compelling buildings to be constructed (see Betty-June School v.

Drucker v. Frisina

31 Misc. 2d 469 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1961

The village contends that petitioner must exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Appeals, because under article XIV (§ III [b]) the board has authority “ where an appeal is taken for a variance to permit … (Food Corp. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 288, 290-291 ; italics in original.) Fryer v.

Stella v. O'Rourke

58 Misc. 2d 1041 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1968

This was based .on subdivision 5 of section 330 of the Election Law and on the authority of Matter of Rice v. … In Matter of Rice v.

Arthur v. Virkler

144 Misc. 483 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1932

(Cunningham v. Miller, 178 Wis. 22 ; Saier v. Joy, 198 Mich. 295 ; Dillon v. Moran, 237 id. 130; Beisel v. Crosby, 104 Neb. 643 ; Meagher v. Kessler, 147 Minn. 182 ; Osborn v. Shreveport, 143 La. 932 ; Brown v. … City of Los Angeles, 183 Cal. 783 ; Hatcher v. Hitchcock, 129 Kan. 88 ; Densmore v. Evergreen Camp, 61 Wash. 230 ; Haan v. Heath, 161 id. 128; Jordan v. Nesmith, 132 Okla. 226 ; Bragg v. Ives, 149 Va. 482 ; Meldahl v.

AMT CADC Venture, LLC v. 455 CPW, L.L.C.

45 Misc. 3d 176 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2013

(See Bankers Trust Co. v Board of Mgrs. of Park 900 Condominium, 81 NY2d 1033, 1035 [1993]; Cadlerock Joint Venture v Board of Mgrs. of Parkchester S. Condominium, 289 AD2d 1 [1st Dept 2001].) A. … (Pekelnaya v Allyn, 25 AD3d 111, 118 [1st Dept 2005].) Board of Mgrs. of Parkchester N.

Mohr v. Schroeder

162 Misc. 2d 584 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1994

Any such investigation, therefore, must be made with Board authority, in this case by agreement of both Commissioners pursuant to Election Law § 3-212 (see, Matter of Lenihan v Blackwell, — AD2d —, 1994 NY Slip Op 09846 [ … If the State Board then determines that an investigation is required, it can either conduct same, or direct the County Board to do so.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland

176 Misc. 258 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1941

(Matter of Wallach’s, Inc., v. Boland, 253 App. Div. 371 ; affd., 277 N. Y. 345 . See, also, N. L. R. B. v. Falk Corp., 308 U. S. 453 ; Amer. Fed. of Labor v. N.L.R. B., Id. 401; N. L. R. B. v. … In that case (Bank of Yorktown v. Boland, 280 N.

Liguori v. Beloten

26 Misc. 3d 593 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2009

Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 (2000), quoting CPLR 7803 (3). . Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … Corp. v McBarnette, 84 NY2d 194, 204 (1994). . Board of Regents of State Colleges v Roth, 408 US 564, 573 (1972); see e.g.

Markovich v. Feriola

41 Misc. 2d 1051 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1963

the discretionary acts of the hundreds of town boards and town zoning boards in this State ” (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. … Matter of Crossroads Recreation v. Broz, 4 N Y 2d 39; Matter of Stillman v. Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N. Y., 247 N. Y. 599 , affg. 222 App. Div. 19 ; Matter of Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App. Div. 348 ).

Garden City Jewish Center v. Incorporated Village of Garden City

2 Misc. 2d 1009 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1956

This analysis of the respective roles of the board of appeals and the board of trustees is supported by the decisions in Matter of Community Synagogue v. Bates (1 N Y 2d 445, supra) and Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. … In Matter of Diocese of Rochester v.

Morris v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

40 Misc. 3d 226 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2013

v Travis, 10 AD3d 828 [3d Dept 2004]), it is the obligation of the Parole Board to give fair consideration 7 to each of the statutory factors, and where, as here, the record convincingly demonstrates that the Board in fact … See Thwaites v. New York State Board of Parole, 34 Misc 3d 694 . See also Lichtel v. Travis, 287 AD2d 83 .”

Glen Truck Sales & Service, Inc. v. Sirignano

31 Misc. 2d 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1961

Corp. v. City of New York, 18 Misc 2d 106 ; Matter of Kniska v. Splain, 201 Misc. 729 ; Matter of Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. … Co. v. City of Cleveland, 70 Ohio Law Abst. 303 .) Thus, in Pascoe v.

Cummings v. Regan

76 Misc. 2d 137 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1973

Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole, 363 F. Supp. 416 [give reasons for denial of parole]; Melson v. … Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole, 363 F. Supp. 416, 419 , supra.) A challenge to the discretion of the board may be a matter for another day.

Storrier v. Moses

199 Misc. 718 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1951

v. … Since Brown’s period of suspension exceeded ten days, the case was in no event within the provision of subdivision 3 of section 22 of the Civil Service Law here considered. All Matter of Brown v.

Allen v. Kelley

191 Misc. 762 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1948

Hummel v. Trial Term, 184 N. … (Matter of Wallach's, Inc., v. Boland, 277 N. Y. 345 .)

People v. Jardin

154 Misc. 2d 172 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1992

(See, People v Sanders, 56 NY2d 51, 64 [1982]; see also, People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518-519 [1987]; People v Caviness, 38 NY2d 227, 231 [1975].) … (See, People v Brown, 179 AD2d 485 [1st Dept 1992]; People v Luke, 136 Misc 2d 733, 734-739 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1987], affd 147 AD2d 990 [1st Dept 1989]; People v Watson, 100 AD2d 452, 463-469 [2d Dept 1984].)

People v. Sacchitella

73 Misc. 2d 678 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1973

(Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 ; People v. Savvides, 1 N Y 2d 554; Miller v. Pate, 386 U. S. 1 ; Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penetentiary, 331 F. 2d 842 .) … (People v. Matera, 52 Misc 2d 674 ; People v. Whitmore, 45 Misc 2d 506 ; Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, supra; Ellis v. United States, 345 F. 2d 961 ; United States ex rel. Meers v.