Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.66s
16 Misc. 2d 252 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1958
asserts it (Rodgers v. … Zoning is a legislative function placed, in the case of towns, under the control of the Town Board.
Cited 1 timesPublished9 Wend. 80 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832
Brown v. Bement, 8 Johns. R. 96. … Brown v. Bement, 8 Johns. R. 96. Ackley v. Finch, 7 Cowen, 290. ,. The notes which this mortgage was given to secure, appear to have been assigned or transferred to one Pitcher.
Cited 71 timesPublishedMorris v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision
40 Misc. 3d 226 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2013
v Travis, 10 AD3d 828 [3d Dept 2004]), it is the obligation of the Parole Board to give fair consideration 7 to each of the statutory factors, and where, as here, the record convincingly demonstrates that the Board in fact … See Thwaites v. New York State Board of Parole, 34 Misc 3d 694 . See also Lichtel v. Travis, 287 AD2d 83 .”
Cited 3 timesPublishedGlen Truck Sales & Service, Inc. v. Sirignano
31 Misc. 2d 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1961
Corp. v. City of New York, 18 Misc 2d 106 ; Matter of Kniska v. Splain, 201 Misc. 729 ; Matter of Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. … Co. v. City of Cleveland, 70 Ohio Law Abst. 303 .) Thus, in Pascoe v.
Cited 20 timesPublished57 Misc. 3d 1210A · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2017
Amaro v Gani Realty Corp. , 60 AD3d 491 (1st Dept 2009); Skillgames, LLC v Brody , 1 AD3d 247 , 250 (1st Dept 2003), citing McGill v Parker , 179 AD2d 98, 105 (1st Dept 1992); see also Cron v Hargro Fabrics, Inc. , 91 NY2d … ."); see Rich v Yu Kwai Chong , 66 A3d 963, 976 (Del Ch 2013) ("By making a litigation demand on a board of directors, a stockholder concedes that the board is able to evaluate the demand, free from concerns of conflicts
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Abb. Pr. 46 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1870
In Squires v. Brown ( 22 How. … In Belmont v. Coleman ( 21 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished117 Misc. 457 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1921
Prosser v. Secor, 5 Barb. 607 ; Lapolt v. Maltby, 10 Misc. Rep. 330 ; N. Y. Milk Products v. Damon, 57 App. Div. 261 ; Mygatt v. Washburn, 15 N. Y. 316 ; Dorwin v. Strickland, 57 id. 492; Hilton v. Fonda, 86 id. 340. … Vail v. Owen, 19 Barb. 22 ; Brown v. Smith, 24 id. 419; Tucker v. City of Utica, 35 App. Div. 173 -176; Board of Education v. Henderson, 42 id. 237 ; Swift v. Poughkeepsie, 37 N. Y. 511 ; Bell v. Pierce, 51 id. 12; Nat.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAnti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith v. Arab Anti-Defamation League
72 Misc. 2d 847 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1972
Div. 49,52; Brown v. Cole, 54 Misc. 278 [injunction to restrain defendant, whose title was “ chairman ”]). The individual codefend *851 ant holds a position equivalent to 'a president. … Rev. 813 , 831 [1927]; See Brown, Advertising and the Public Interest: Legal Protection of Trade Symbols, 57 Yale L.J. 1165 , 1191, n. 103 [1948]).
Cited 5 timesPublished17 Misc. 534 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1896
Rathbun v. Acker, supra. … Taylor v. Porter, 4 Hill, 147 ; Parker v. Browning, 8 Paige, 388 ; Wynehamer v. People, 13 N. Y. 378 .
Cited 2 timesPublished72 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1972
Concerning the Zoning Board’s findings of fact, set forth above, they disclose no evidence upon which they are based and are mere conclusions restating the language found in the zoning ordinance (Matter of Hattem v. … In the absence of any demonstration or claim by the Zoning Board that public health, safety and welfare will be served by denying the variance (Matter of Fulling v.
Cited 1 timesPublished74 Misc. 2d 339 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1973
Due to this failure the confusion and chaos predicted by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department in Matter of Ehrenberg v. Persons (8 A D 2d 18, 21) has arisen. … (Matter of Pansa v. Damiano, 14 N Y 2d 356, 360; Matter of Highway Displays v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Wappinger, 32 A D 2d 668.) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Cited 7 timesPublished91 Misc. 278 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1915
Brown, J. … Co. v. Schuster, 66 Misc. Rep. 634 ; Wood v. Knapp, 100 N. Y. 109 ; City of New York v. Matthews, 180 id. 41; Thompson v. Burhans, 61 id. 63; Peterson v. Martino, 210 id. 412; Caulkins v.
Cited 8 timesPublished107 Misc. 130 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1919
Y. 280 ; Hogan v. Board of Education, 200 id. 370 . … Clarke Co. v. Board of Education, 156 App. Div. 842 ; affd., 215 N.. Y. 646.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBuffalo Audio Center Arrolite Co. v. Union Free School District No. 1
29 Misc. 2d 871 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1960
(See, also, Cottrell v. Board of Educ. of N. Y., 181 Misc. 645 .) … (Matter of Jacobson v. Board of Educ., 177 Misc. 809 ; Matter of Frankie v. Board of Educ., 285 N. Y. 541 ; Matter of Leeds v. Board of Educ., 19 Misc 2d 860 .) II.
Cited 6 timesPublished57 Misc. 3d 835 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2017
Transp. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 253 AD2d 330, 337 [1st Dept 1999], lvs denied 93 NY2d 808 [1999]; Matter of Kenton Assoc. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 225 AD2d 349, 350 [1st Dept 1996].) E. … A. v Brown, 564 US 915, 925 [2011].)
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re the Accounting of Marine Trust Co.
187 Misc. 201 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1946
The Brown case (supra) was distinguished by Judge Haight in Clark v. Cammann ( 160 N. … The Brown case (supra) was approved by Judge Bartlett in Salisbury v. Slade ( 160 N. Y. 278, 290 ). Further authority may be found in Hersee v. Simpson ( 154 N. Y. 496 ), Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips ( 218 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished14 Barb. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1853
(Conger v. Johnston, 2 Denio, 96 . Commercial Bank v. Sparrow, Id. 97 . Boyce v. Brown, 7 Barb. 80, 85 . McMurray v. Gifford, 5 How. Pr. Rep. 14 . Lewis v. Kendall, 6 Id. 59, 64, 5, 6 . Sayles v. Wooden, Id. 84 . … Buddington v. Davis, Id. 401. Anibal v. Hunter, Id. 255.) Duplicity is pointed out by the demurrer, and is a fatal objection. (Boyce v. Brown, supra.) *535 The fourth objection is more general.
Cited 19 timesPublished25 Misc. 2d 591 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1960
Bates, 1 N Y 2d 445; Hopkins v. Board of Appeals, 179 Misc. 325 [Van Voorhis, J.].) … Corp. v. Eccleston, 7 A D 2d 737.)
Cited 15 timesPublishedMiller v. Incorporated Village of East Hills
41 Misc. 2d 525 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1963
Board of Zoning Appeals, 13 A D 2d 1030; Matter of Property Owners Assn. of Garden City Estates v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Garden City, 2 Misc 2d 309 ). … Further, they have shown no personal damage and cannot be said to be aggrieved (Matter of Moore v. Burchell, 14 A D 2d 572; Blumberg v. Hill, 119 N. Y. S. 2d 855; Matter of Blum v.
Cited 3 timesPublished2 Misc. 3d 332 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 2003
(See Brown v Greiner, 258 F Supp 2d 68 [2003]; Rosen v Walsh, US Dist Ct, ED NY, Hellerstein, J., Index *335 No. 02-7782.) … (See People v Kin Kan, 78 NY2d 54 [1991].) However, subsequent to Rosen the United States Supreme Court made clear beyond peradventure that Rosen’s analysis cannot stand. (Ring v Arizona, 536 US 584 [2002].)
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna