Case law

In re Strasburger

4 Silv. Sup. 301 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1889

Murphy v. Board, etc., 53 Hun, 171 . … Board, etc., 53 Id. 171; Spence v. Chambers, 39 Id. 193.

Mezey Motors, Inc. v. O'Dwyer

195 Misc. 160 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1949

The earlier proceeding was dismissed (Matter of Pagano Realty Corp. v. … an injunction pendente lite to restrain a municipal corporation from the exercise of legislative or governmental power, even though the contemplated action *162 may be in disregard of constitutional restraints (Greenberg v.

Kruze v. Keleher

31 Misc. 2d 756 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1961

V, §7.) … (See Scanlon v. New York City Employees’ Retirement System, N. Y. L. J., June 29, 1938, p. 3134, col. 4.) Nor is it a case like Quinn v. Annese (23 N. Y.

Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin

30 Misc. 2d 185 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1961

(Atcheson v. Mallon, 43 N. Y. 147 ; Woodworth v. Bennett, 43 N. Y. 273 ; Marsh v. Russell, 66 N. Y. 288 ; People v. Stephens, 71 N. Y. 527 ; Sharp v. Wright, 35 Barb. 236 ; Baird v. Sheehan, 38 App. … Forbes, 64 Misc. 130 ; Warren Bros. v. City of New York, 190 N. Y. 297 ). "Where the board has exceeded its authority, the court has a right to step in (Matter of Schwab v. McElligott, 282 N. Y. 182 ).

Miller v. Incorporated Village of East Hills

41 Misc. 2d 525 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1963

Board of Zoning Appeals, 13 A D 2d 1030; Matter of Property Owners Assn. of Garden City Estates v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Garden City, 2 Misc 2d 309 ). … Further, they have shown no personal damage and cannot be said to be aggrieved (Matter of Moore v. Burchell, 14 A D 2d 572; Blumberg v. Hill, 119 N. Y. S. 2d 855; Matter of Blum v.

Harris v. Oakley

2 N.Y.S. 305 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888

Wendell v. People, supra. … See, also, Dawley v. Brown, 79 N. Y. 390 ; Smith v. Faulkner, 48 Hun, 186 , (decided by this court at the March term, 1888.) The title under which the prior possession is claimed to be held must cover the premises.

Corlies v. Cumming

6 Cow. 181 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1826

Justice Story, in Burrill v. … In the ease of Goodenow v. Tyler, ( 7 Mass. Rep. 36 ,) the factor took a note payable to himself.

Salsberg v. Spero

106 Misc. 436 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1919

In Brown v. Muller, 1872, L. … But on the question of the measure of damages the judges were unanimous in applying the principles of Brown v. Muller. In the language of Keating, J. (p. 176): “ The rule laid down by the Court of Exchequer in Brown v.

Second Methodist Episcopal Church v. Humphrey

49 N.Y. St. Rep. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1892

That such deed had been procured by the trustees of the plaintiff and its minister, one Brown. … Brown, the minister, as stated by her on her direct examination.

Sullivan v. Longo

189 Misc. 2d 140 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2001

(Matter of Rose v Smith, 220 AD2d 922 [and other cases cited therein]; also, Matter of Stempel v Albany County Bd. of Elections, 97 AD2d 647 , affd 60 NY2d 801 .) … (See Matter of Plunkett v Mahoney, 76 NY2d 848 .)

Busking v. Kronimus

41 Misc. 2d 985 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1963

Board of Fire Commissioners. … Withholding that right is a denial of due process (Matter of Hecht v. Monaghan, 307 N. Y. 461, 470 ; Matter of Merritt v. Swope, supra; cf. Matter of Gardner v. Ward, 199 N. Y. S. 2d 953).

Lippe v. Cisternino

44 Misc. 2d 510 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1964

Hence, Matter of Pisicchio v. Board of Appeals ( 165 Misc. 156 ) and other cases involving an actual nonconforming “use” are not in point. … This court does not have to determine whether the Town Board had the power to limit the power of the Zoning Board of Appeals (see Matter of Waldorf v.

Maroney v. Friere

74 Misc. 2d 339 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1973

Due to this failure the confusion and chaos predicted by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department in Matter of Ehrenberg v. Persons (8 A D 2d 18, 21) has arisen. … (Matter of Pansa v. Damiano, 14 N Y 2d 356, 360; Matter of Highway Displays v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Wappinger, 32 A D 2d 668.) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

Meyer v. Burns

16 Misc. 2d 252 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1958

asserts it (Rodgers v. … Zoning is a legislative function placed, in the case of towns, under the control of the Town Board.

Vandeweghe v. City of New York

150 Misc. 815 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1934

In Lilienthal v. City of Yonkers ( 6 App. Div. 138 ; affd., on opinion below, 154 N. Y. 766 ) the court had occasion to consider the meaning of the word “ pavement.” Brown, P. … Burhans v. City, of New York, 198 id. 439 ; People ex rel. Hannan v. Board of Health of City of Troy, 153 id. 512 ; Hayden v. Pierce, 144 id. 512 ; Polhemus v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 123 id. 502 .)

Arthur v. Brooks

14 Barb. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1853

(Conger v. Johnston, 2 Denio, 96 . Commercial Bank v. Sparrow, Id. 97 . Boyce v. Brown, 7 Barb. 80, 85 . McMurray v. Gifford, 5 How. Pr. Rep. 14 . Lewis v. Kendall, 6 Id. 59, 64, 5, 6 . Sayles v. Wooden, Id. 84 . … Buddington v. Davis, Id. 401. Anibal v. Hunter, Id. 255.) Duplicity is pointed out by the demurrer, and is a fatal objection. (Boyce v. Brown, supra.) *535 The fourth objection is more general.

Reese v. Andreotti

57 Misc. 3d 1210A · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2017

Amaro v Gani Realty Corp. , 60 AD3d 491 (1st Dept 2009); Skillgames, LLC v Brody , 1 AD3d 247 , 250 (1st Dept 2003), citing McGill v Parker , 179 AD2d 98, 105 (1st Dept 1992); see also Cron v Hargro Fabrics, Inc. , 91 NY2d … ."); see Rich v Yu Kwai Chong , 66 A3d 963, 976 (Del Ch 2013) ("By making a litigation demand on a board of directors, a stockholder concedes that the board is able to evaluate the demand, free from concerns of conflicts

Hope Cemetery Ass'n v. Rose

117 Misc. 457 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1921

Prosser v. Secor, 5 Barb. 607 ; Lapolt v. Maltby, 10 Misc. Rep. 330 ; N. Y. Milk Products v. Damon, 57 App. Div. 261 ; Mygatt v. Washburn, 15 N. Y. 316 ; Dorwin v. Strickland, 57 id. 492; Hilton v. Fonda, 86 id. 340. … Vail v. Owen, 19 Barb. 22 ; Brown v. Smith, 24 id. 419; Tucker v. City of Utica, 35 App. Div. 173 -176; Board of Education v. Henderson, 42 id. 237 ; Swift v. Poughkeepsie, 37 N. Y. 511 ; Bell v. Pierce, 51 id. 12; Nat.

Fox v. Adams

206 Misc. 236 · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 1954

Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 , and Matter of Bach v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of North Hempstead, 282 App. Div. 879 . See, also, Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46, 51, 52 .) … (See Matter of Bach v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of North Hempstead, supra, and Hempstead Bottling Works Corp. v. Patterson , 117 N. Y. S. 2d 103.) If the parties so stipulate, the order hereon may so provide.

Gilbert v. Sage

5 Lans. 287 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1871

(Halsey v. Sinsebaugh, 15 N. Y., 488 ; Guy v. Mead, 22 N. Y., 462 ; Marcly v. Shults, 29 N. Y., 351 ; Stroud v. Tilton, 3 Keyes, 139 .) … Brown testified to a declaration made by Williams, which tended to show the liability of the defendants.