Case law

Lee v. Parker

43 Barb. 611 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1865

In Eagle Fire Company v. … In Lewis v.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland

176 Misc. 258 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1941

(Matter of Wallach’s, Inc., v. Boland, 253 App. Div. 371 ; affd., 277 N. Y. 345 . See, also, N. L. R. B. v. Falk Corp., 308 U. S. 453 ; Amer. Fed. of Labor v. N.L.R. B., Id. 401; N. L. R. B. v. … In that case (Bank of Yorktown v. Boland, 280 N.

Picone v. City of New York

176 Misc. 967 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1941

(Matter of Sikorski v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., N. Y. L. J. July 10, 1637, p. 100; affd., 253 App. Div. 824 .) It implies skill, judgment and integrity as well as sufficient financial resources. … (Campbell v. City of New York, 244 N. Y. 317, 328 ; Matter of Tuller Construction Co. v. Lyon, 257 id. 206, 208; Syracuse Intercepting Sewer Board v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 255 id. 288, 294; Kelly v.

Oliver v. Moore

6 N.Y.S. 413 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1889

The eases upon which the defendant bases his argument that the contract in question here is merely an agreement for *415 board and lodging, and not a lease, are White v. Maynard, supra, and Wilson v. … In Wilson v.

Jennings v. Kern

134 Misc. 2d 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1987

Board of Appeals, Vil. of Southampton, 50 Misc 2d 205 , affd 27 AD2d 705 ; Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ) because the right to use the substandard parcel is a vested one (Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals … (See also, Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ; Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals, 28 AD2d 848 ; Matter of Mandalay Constr. v Eccleston, 9 AD2d 918 .)

Village of Bronxville v. Francis

206 Misc. 339 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1954

Div. 818 ; Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y., 278 App. Div. 659 , affd. 302 N. Y. 920 ; 359 West 34th St. v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y., 279 App. … In the two cases in which reliance was placed upon this factor (Matter of Hopkins v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 179 Misc. 325 , and Bannister v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of East Hampton, 65 N. Y.

Berner v. Schlesinger

11 Misc. 2d 1024 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1957

Nevertheless, the principles underlying the privilege are equally applicable in civil actions or proceedings (Brown v. United States, 234 F. 2d 140, 145-146 ; Matter of Grae, 282 N. Y. 428, 433 ; Siegel v. … Moreover, the waiver is not partial, but complete. “ Having cast aside the cloak of immunity, the party may not resume it at will ” (Brown v.

In re the Board of Education

175 Misc. 205 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1940

(Education Law, § 890; Kabatt v. Board of Education, 246 App. Div. 886 ; appeal dismissed, 271 N. Y. 629 .) … (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566, 577, 578 ; Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education , 243 id. 373.)

Mirrington v. Vandemark

51 Misc. 2d 305 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1966

Board of Elections of Columbia County, 207 Misc 12, 15 ) in the subscribing witness’ presence in order to be counted. (Matter of Kerns v. Whiting, 187 Misc. 656, 659 .) … (Matter of Fazio v. Meisser, 209 N. Y. S. 2d 17, 18, 19, affd. 11 A D 2d 1029.) The board’s void action is not presumed valid. (Schwartz v. DeSapio, 9 A D 2d 756.)

Wilmerding v. Jarmulowsky

32 N.Y.S. 983 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1895

Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354 ; Baker v. Bliss, 39 N. Y. 70 ; Acer v. Westcott, 46 N. Y. 384 ; Reed v. Gannon, 50 N. Y. 345 ; Bennett v. Buchan, 76 N. Y. 386 ; Kirsch v. Tozier, 143 N. Y. 390 , 38 N. E. 375 . … The effect of this decision was to create an exception to the general rule asserted by Williamson v. Brown. As this case is of the same character as Stearns v.

Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Department of Labor

18 Misc. 2d 1070 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1959

an original action instituted in this court is to be treated as ‘ ‘ an appeal from the determination of the board ”, but that is exactly what the statute prescribes (Lincoln Candies v. … Hegeman Farms Corp. v. Baldwin, 293 U. S. 163, 170 ; Fox v. Standard Oil Co., 294 U.

Bonney v. Bonney

13 Misc. 2d 866 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1946

He cites, among others, the cases of Tiedemann v. Tiedemann ( 94 Misc. 449 ); Brown v. Brown ( 153 App. Div. 645 ); Berry v. Berry ( 130 App. Div. 53 ) as authority in support of his position. … In Brown v. Brown (supra) no answer was put in, and hence no equitable defense was pleaded.

Chesler v. Bronstein

176 Misc. 2d 237 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1997

. *240 Ariel presently attends Brandéis University, where the total cost of his tuition, room and board, activity fee and health coverage is $29,000 per year. … [Goodwin] v Brown, 229 AD2d 537, 538 [2d Dept 1996]).

Griffith v. Wells

3 Denio 226 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1846

(Johnson v. Hudson, 11 East, 180; Brown v. Duncan, 10 Barn. & Cress. 93 ; Chitty on Cont. 419, 697, ed. of 1842.) … (Law v. Hodgson, 2 Camp. 147; Brown v. Duncan, 10 B. & C. 93; Foster v. Taylor, 3 Nev. & Man. 244 ; 5 B. & Ad. 887, S. C. ; Little v. Poole, 9 B. & C. 192; Tyson v. Thomas, McClel. & Younge, 119; Wheeler v.

People v. Salaam

174 Misc. 2d 726 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1997

Corp. v Acme Quilting Co., 46 NY2d 211, 219-220 [1978]; Abrahami v UPC Constr. Co., 224 AD2d 231, 233 [1st Dept 1996]). … "We express no opinion on the state law issue of the degree of deference a court should give to the views of the Board” (Doe v Pataki, supra, at 1269, 1281, n 18 ). .

People ex rel. McNair v. West

77 Misc. 2d 150 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1974

Menechino v. Warden, 27 N Y 2d 376 [1971]; People ex rel. Maggio v. Casscles, 28 N Y 2d 415 [1971]; People ex rel. Silbert v. Cohen, 29 N Y 2d 12 [1971]). … The nonretroactivity of Morrissey v. Brewer ( 408 U. S. 471 , supra), relied on by the Parole Board, is irrelevant to the issues of this case.

Walls v. Hammock

107 Misc. 2d 704 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1981

“(ii) The revocation hearing shall be conducted by a presiding officer who may be a member or a hearing officer designated by the board in accordance with rules of the board. … Levy v Dalsheim, 66 AD2d 827 , affd 48 NY2d 1019 ; People ex rel. Johnson v New York State Bd. of Parole, 71 AD2d 595 ; People ex rel. Elmore v Dalsheim, 69 AD2d 909 ; People ex rel. Nelson v Hammock, 96 Misc 2d 776 .)

Retan v. Mathewson

131 Misc. 106 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1927

(Todaro v. Todaro, 120 Misc. 807 ; Lazarczyk v. Lazarczyk, 121 id. 723; 122 id. 536; Foley v. Foley, Id. 663, 664.) … Our statutes provide not only for a divorce, but for a .separation from bed and board.

Bell v. Dagg

2 Thomp. & Cook 623 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874

When it became due it was not paid, and plain tiff' brought an action upon it against Brown. Brown, defending, alleged that the signature of his name to the note was a forgery. … Delaware Bank v. Jarvis, 20 N. Y. 228 ; Fake v. Smith, 7 Abb. N. S. 106; Whitney v. Nat. Bank of Potsdam, 45 N. Y. 303 .

Bonacorsa v. Van Lindt

132 Misc. 2d 581 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1986

(Matter of Marra v City of White Plains, 96 AD2d 17 [2d Dept 1983].) … (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233 [1974].)