Case law

Utilities & Industries Corp. v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

45 Misc. 2d 1014 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1965

Y. 157 ; Becker v. Frasse & Co., 255 N. Y. 10 ; Duttweiler v. Jacobs, 223 App. Div. 292 ). … The court cannot make a new contract for the parties under the guise of interpreting the writing (Friedman v. Handelman, 300 N. Y. 188 ; Brown v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 278 N. Y. 317 ; Graf v. Hope Bldg. Corp., 254 N.

Gulest Associates, Inc. v. Town of Newburgh

25 Misc. 2d 1004 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1960

(Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, supra; Lyons & Co. v. Corsi, 3 N Y 2d 60, 66-67; Baddour v. City of Long Beach, supra, p. 177; Vernon Park Realty v. City of Mt. Vernon, 307 N. … (Packer Collegiate Inst. v. University of State of N. Y., 298 N. Y. 184 ; Matter of Small v. Moss, 279 N. Y. 288 .)

Hiscox v. Levine

31 Misc. 2d 151 · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 1961

The rule applies as well to planning boards as to any administra *154 tive agency. (Gore v. Hicks, 115 N. Y. S. 2d 187.) … Therein they utilize consistently the words 11 rezoning ” and “ rezoned ” to describe the board’s act. The language of Mr. Justice Ritchie in Matter of Hess v.

In re Nadel

188 Misc. 2d 427 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2001

(People v Olah, 300 NY 96 [1949].) … (People v Muniz, 74 NY2d 464 .)

Cooke v. Dodge

164 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1937

(Goodman Bros., Inc., v. Ashton, 211 App. Div. 769 ; Peabody, Jr., & Co., Inc., v. Travelers Ins. Co., 210 id. 261, 264; Almirall & Co., Inc., v. McClement, 207 id. 320, 328; Nillson v. Lawrence, 148 id. 678; De Jong v. … (Steinson v. Board of Education of N. Y., 165 N. Y. 431 ; Murphy v. Board of *81 Education, 87 App. Div. 277, 278 ; Munnally v. Board of Education, 46 Misc. 477 ; Matter of Gelson v. Berry, 253 App. Div. 20 .)

People ex rel. Welling v. Meakin

10 N.Y.S. 161 · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 1890

The learned counsel for the appellant evidently misapprehends the language of Emott, J., in People v. Board, 27 N. Y. 378 , quoted and followed in People v. Booth, 49 Barb. 31 , and People v. Taylor, 1 Abb. Pr. (N. … In People v.

Royce v. Burt

42 Barb. 655 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1864

(Wood v. Jackson, 8 Wend. 9 , reversing Jackson v. Wood, 3 Wend. 27 . Lawrence v. Hunt, 10 id. 80 . Gardner v. Buckbee, 3 Cowen, 120. Burt v. Sternburgh, 4 id. 559.) … The case of Doty v. Brown, (4 Comst. 71,) is very much in point to sustain these views. In that case Doty brought replevin against Brown, for a quantity of hay and other property.

Green v. Disbrow

7 Lans. 381 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1872

He boarded the hands without charge. … (Penniman v. Rotch, 3 Metc., 216 ; see also Kimball v. Brown, 7 Wend, 322; Norton, v. Laus, 30 Cal. 126 ; Code, § 95.)

Watson v. Butcher

44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 391 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1885

(dissenting): We think the assignment in question in this case is void, for the reasons stated iu Dunham v. Watermam, ( 17 N. Y., 9 ), and kindred eases. … (Smith v. Beatty, 31 N. Y., 545 .) The assignment being void, it was proper to appoint a receiver in order to preserve the estate and to protect the rights of the plaintiffs and the other creditors. (Bloodgood v.

Walls v. Hammock

107 Misc. 2d 704 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1981

“(ii) The revocation hearing shall be conducted by a presiding officer who may be a member or a hearing officer designated by the board in accordance with rules of the board. … Levy v Dalsheim, 66 AD2d 827 , affd 48 NY2d 1019 ; People ex rel. Johnson v New York State Bd. of Parole, 71 AD2d 595 ; People ex rel. Elmore v Dalsheim, 69 AD2d 909 ; People ex rel. Nelson v Hammock, 96 Misc 2d 776 .)

Horner v. Shepard

3 How. Pr. 16 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1846

Brown was irregular; Shepard, Babbitt, Hall and Brown were joint and several makers of the promissory note upon which the action was brought. … S. 377, sec. 1 ; Nelson v. Bostwick, 5 Hill, 37 ; Platner v. Johnson, 3 Hill, 476 ; Miller v. McGagg, 4 Hill, 35 .)

Bomar v. Cole

177 Misc. 740 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1941

A teacher having been dismissed by a board of education during a probationary period has no right to review such dismissal. It has been so decided. (Matter of Williams, 53 State Dept. Rep. 164; Matter of O’Connor v. … Walrath v. O’Brien, 112 App. Div. 97 ; Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566, 577 .) A careful reading of the record convinces this court that petitioner was in no instance deprived of any of her legal rights.

Vitolo v. Chave

63 Misc. 2d 971 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1970

Randol (29 A D 2d 778); Matter of Moore v. Burchell (14 A D 2d 572, mot. for lv. to app. den. 10 N Y 2d 709); Matter of Lido Beach Civic Assn. v. Board of Zoning Appeals (13 A D 2d 1030); Point Lookout Civic Assn. v. … Newill, a member of the association who testified he lived within 300 feet (see Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325, 333 ; Matter of Haber v. Board of Estimate, 33 A D 2d 571; Matter of Moore v.

Santos v. Chappell

65 Misc. 2d 559 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1971

Club v. Higgins, 23 F. Supp. 572 ; Kubik v. American Composers Alliance, 54 N. Y. … (See Salzman v. Sakofsky, 195 Misc. 166 ; White v. White, 175 Misc. 66 .)

Horacek-Hayden, Inc. v. County of Monroe

65 Misc. 2d 196 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1970

In Grimm v. … In Meyer v.

Village of Bronxville v. Francis

206 Misc. 339 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1954

Div. 818 ; Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y., 278 App. Div. 659 , affd. 302 N. Y. 920 ; 359 West 34th St. v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y., 279 App. … In the two cases in which reliance was placed upon this factor (Matter of Hopkins v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 179 Misc. 325 , and Bannister v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of East Hampton, 65 N. Y.

People v. Livingston

134 Misc. 2d 711 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1987

(United States v Bonfiglio, 713 F2d 932, 936.) … (See, People v Diaz, supra, at 216-217.)

Spence v. Niper

22 Misc. 2d 840 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1959

John v. Putnam, 128 Misc. 714 ; Bonds v. Smith, 143 F. 2d 369 .) … John v. Putnam, supra.) However, since these wills of Louis S.

Kayatt v. Dinkins

148 Misc. 2d 510 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1990

In Battista v Board of Estimate ( 51 Misc 2d 962, 964 [NY County 1966], affd 27 AD2d 986 [1st Dept 1967]) it was found that the Mayor properly delegated his assistant to chair a Board of Estimate meeting, Justice Gellinoff … In this regard reference is made to Matter of Morgenthau v Cooke ( 56 NY2d 24 [1982]) and Komyathy v Board of Educ. (75 Misc 2d 859 [Dutchess County 1973]) which discuss the "rule of necessity.”

Lapolla v. Dullaghan

63 Misc. 2d 157 · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1970

Fish v. Sandstrom, 279 N. Y. 523 , supra, per Judge Lehman.) … Radich, supra; Hoffman v. United States, 256 A. 2d 567 [Ct. of App., D. C., 1969]; People v. Cowgill, 274 Cal. App. 2d 923 , app. dsmd. 396 TJ.