Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.77s

  • Elkind v. City of New Rochelle

    5 Misc. 2d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1957

    (Browne v. City of New York, 241 N. Y. 96 .) ” (See, also, Matter of International Ry. Co. v. Public Service Comm., 242 App. Div. 300 ; Matter of Oystermen’s Dock Co. v. Downing, 258 N. Y. 156, 160 .) … reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The common council may from time to time on its own motion or on petition, after public notice and hearing, which hearing may be held by the council or by a committee of the council or by the planning board

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Ackerman v. Cobb Lime Co.

    3 N.Y.S. 892 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889

    The action is clearly maintainable, (Hathaway v. Town of Cincinnatus, 62 N. … Buel v. Boughton, 2 Denio, 91 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Swedish Hospital in Brooklyn v. Leo

    120 Misc. 355 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1923

    The general rule, therefore, is that such a board is not vested with the power to reopen and rehear a proceeding which has once been terminated. People ex rel. Smith v. Clarke, 174 N. Y. 259 ; Osterhoudt v. … Brennan v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Dubin v. Muchnick

    108 Misc. 2d 1042 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1981

    Pape and all three defendants constituted the board of directors. When Mr. … That statement still governs (Redmond v Redmond, 42 AD2d 542 ; Tremsky v Green, 106 NYS2d 572 ; see Puro v Puro, 89 Misc 2d 856, 863 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bookheim v. Alexander

    71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 458 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    v. … In Joy v. Diefendorf (40 N. Y. St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 200 West 79th Street Co. v. Galvin

    71 Misc. 2d 190 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1970

    (Riker v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra; People ex rel. Swedish Hosp. v. Leo, 120 Misc. 355 , affd. 215 App. Div. 696 ; Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 138 Misc. 187 , affd. 230 App. … Y. 126 ; Town of Greece v. Smith, 256 App. Div. 886 ; Ellsworth Realty Co. v. Kramer, 268 App. Div. 824 ; see Matter of Collins v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 253 N. Y. 594 ; Matter of McGarry v. Walsh, 213 App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lasky v. Van Lindt

    115 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1982

    OPINION OF THE COURT Orest V. Maresca, J. … Since there is no absolute right to a racehorse owner’s license, petitioner has no “claim of entitlement” that would require the board to grant him a hearing (see Perry v Sindermann, 408 US 593, 601 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hempstead v. Weed

    20 Johns. 64 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1822

    The case of Westby v. Skinner and Catcher, (3 Co. Rep. 71. and Cro. Eliz. 365.) is the leading case upon this subject; and a correct understanding of that case, will show that there was no escape here. … It was asked, whether, if Brown actually escaped, the old sheriff would be liable ?

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hickie v. Valentine

    177 Misc. 743 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1941

    Under such systems, the decision of the medical board is conclusive and the administrative agency of the system merely performs a ministerial duty. (Cf. Matter of Potts v. Kaplan, 264 N. Y. 110, 117 ; Matter of Nash v. … Brooks, 276 id. 75, 81; Matter of Sullivan v. Board of Estimate, 281 id. 766, 767; Matter of Rosenberg v. Board of Estimate, Id. 835; Matter of Nilsson v. LaGuardia, 259 App. Div. 145, 148 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Gondolfo

    94 Misc. 2d 696 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1978

    (See Simmons v United States, supra, p 390; Brown v United States, 411 US 223 ; Jones v United States, supra; People v Hansen, supra; People v Goodman, 51 AD2d 1008 .) … (See Brown v United States, 411 US 223, 229 , supra.)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • New York Times Co. v. City of New York

    176 Misc. 2d 872 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1998

    (Doe v Greco, 62 AD2d, supra, at 501.) … Co. v Cohen, Stracher & Bloom, 65 NY2d 148 , 151 [1985], quoted in Matter of Drew v Schenectady County, supra, at 246.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Olp v. Town of Brighton

    173 Misc. 1079 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1940

    Doscher v. Sisson, supra.) … (Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 281 N. Y. 534 .)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Zangrillo v. Doherty

    40 Misc. 2d 505 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1963

    Sadness v. Wilkins, 312 F. 2d 559 ). The principle maintained by the California, Florida and Federal jurisdictions is in harmony with New York’s posture in this general area (see, e.g., People ex rel. Brown v. … In People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Medine v. Burns

    29 Misc. 2d 890 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1960

    of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Brous v. … (See Lunmor Homes v. Johnson, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 149; Matter of Villa-Lateen Corp. v. Planning Bd., 138 N. Y. S. 2d 362.)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Donnelly v. Riggs

    19 Misc. 693 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1897

    Howland v. Eldredge, 43 N. Y. 457 . … The court in People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jane Street Seafood Cafe Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

    103 Misc. 2d 402 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1980

    The form of worship is of no significance here — "so long as it is religious worship, it makes no difference whether the worshippers, are *404 Christians, or pagan idolaters” (Rogers v Brown, 20 NJL 119, 121). … Church v State Liq. Auth., 245 App Div 176, 178 , affd 270 NY 497 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steele v. Clifton Springs Hospital and Clinic

    6 Misc. 3d 953 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 2005

    The first decision relied upon by plaintiff in refusing to provide HIPAA compliant medical authorizations is Browne v Horbar ( 6 Misc 3d 780 [Sup Ct, NY County 2004]). … For the following reasons, this court declines to follow the holding of Browne v Horbar.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Lord

    13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

    But it is said that the board might reject all bids if they did not consider them advantageous. Of what use would that be ? The *398 board must advertise again. … The case of Breslin v. Brown ( 34 Ohio State, 565 ), was one where a contract for public improvement was to be let to the lowest bidder.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Rockey v. Krueger

    62 Misc. 2d 135 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1969

    Brown v. Johnston, 9 N Y 2d 482). Were that not the case, the issue could properly be presented in an article 78 proceeding (Matter of Brown v. McGinnis, 10 N Y 2d 531; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. … Matter of Brown v. McGinnis (supra); Matter of Bryant v. Wilkins ( 45 Misc 2d 923 , mod. 24 A D 2d 1077, cert. den. 383 U. S. 972 ); Matter of SaMarion v. McGinnis ( 55 Misc 2d 59 ); Jackson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Anders v. Anders

    9 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1957

    In Potter v. Rossiter ( 109 App. … Co. v. O’Donnell, 146 N. Y. 275 ; Valentine v. Central National Bank, 10 Abb. N. C. 190 ; Kelsey v. Sargent, 2 N. Y. St. Repr. 669.) ” In Randall & Sons v. Garfield Worsted Mills ( 178 App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.